Hello !
I implementd the move file function into VFS.
If the file is on the _SAME_ filesystem a _RENAME_ is issued,
otherwise the file is copied to the destination and then deleted at the
source. I know, if the delete failes, the file is duplicated, but this
is the way like some other
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
attachment: bmbehtskpn.bmp-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scohen 2004/03/18 05:47:02
Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser
UnixFTPEntryParser.java
Log:
Fix bug 27556. It is decided that this change could not possibly cause
harm and is therefore approved.
CVS:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Noel,
Pardon me for being dense but are we looking at the same version of the
spec? Are you giving me an answer of yes, this is a bug by reference
to the sections? I am looking at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt,
where the sections 2.7. 7bit Data and 2.8. 8bit Data state that CR
and LF octets
Hello !
I have posted a bunch of enhancements i would like to see (in this or
simmilar way) integrated into VFS.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776
I see there is no work since the last 3 Month on VFS, is this package no
longer maintained?
Ciao,
Mario
smime.p7s
It could form a separate commons project. It could provide
alternative implementations/plugins to the [convert] project.
Plz forgive my delay in following up on this (things got really crazy at work).
Anyway, thanks for the suggestion about [convert]; I really like that approach to
conversion
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
As a general rule, CRLF is an indivisible token. In other RFCs, the IETF
goes so far as to call it an RFC violation for them to ever be recognized or
emitted separately. HOWEVER, to be picky, the News Article Format draft
RFC has said, through all drafts over several years, that:
The syntax
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27781.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Great! I may take my hand at a patch, but I fear am too
new to this project to get my head around it. Maybe I
will Bugzilla this one if I have some time.
Great product all in all. BTW, any thoughts for
Intializable.initializeService() throwing an exception,
too?
I don't want to open
Let me ask you this, how are contemplating handling these exceptions?
Are you going to be catching exceptions when ever you do a lookup or are
you planning on letting these exceptions cascade up to the top and throw
a message to the client. 'Cause either way would be no different than
what it
billbarker2004/03/18 09:28:33
Modified:daemon/src/native/unix/native location.c
Log:
Add locations to look for the jvm.cfg file.
It seems that Sun has moved the file location, at least for some 1.4.x versions on
Solaris.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +3 -1
ggregory2004/03/18 09:34:56
Modified:codec/src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/binary Base64.java
Log:
- Javadoc.
- Remove extraneous () in return statements.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +25 -19
Well Hivemind is new and everyone is new to Hivemind. While I am not (hope
fully soon) a commiter I am sure if you realy get registry.getService() ==
null than this is a bug and everyone will be happy if you patch that.
However if you want to add a throws declaration I agree with Harish that
Gary,
Please excuse the delayed response.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg,
(1) The public Binary.BITS field is not used from anywhere. How is
it
generally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27781.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
(2) The public Binary.BIT_n fields are only used from Binary.
Should
they really be public fields?
Hmmm I think this might be best kept private but I do use them
else
where
in applications that depend on Binary however perhaps incorrectly.
Let me
explain below.
I see
Please remember that I have only used HiveMind here for a
few days, so feel free to add large grains of salt to
these thoughts.
I think I see what you mean. Two me, there are two sides
of this.
1. On the intial load of modules / services, I would like
to see the application have a complete
BTW, I know now that I never had
registry.getService() == null.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:47:49 +0100
Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Hivemind is new and everyone is new to Hivemind.
While I am not (hope fully soon) a commiter I am sure if
you realy get registry.getService() ==
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc. So I do not do it too often. I'll try to do
a VFS this weekend...
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip/
the question is, I think, what
visibility should these fields have? I see several views, from strict to
lax:
(1) Make the fields private, there are implementation details. Let the
unit tests duplicate
Alex,
If you feel like it and have the time, you are welcome to check out the
latest from CVS and submit a patch. Otherwise, I might get to it this
weekend.
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:41
To:
Gary,
If you feel like it and have the time, you are welcome to check out the
latest from CVS and submit a patch. Otherwise, I might get to it this
weekend.
Sure. I'll try to get to it before the weekend.
Alex
-
To
I haven't used Hivemind, but I am going to suggest this anyways :
couldn't you just provide a service that returns the exception
getServiceX()
and another that returns null getService()?
Then it would be up to the user of the API which one they used.
Scot Hale
Original Message
Yes as said I share your concerns but let me explain why they are not so
easy to adress.
First - wheter it's good or bad - Hivemind does not construct or
initialize service-implementations when the Registry/modules/services are
loaded/build. Services are lazy-loaded.
Second you get an
Gary,
It'll split the patch into four smaller ones which can be dealt with one
after another. I'll start with the small tweaks I have made to the
URLCodec with the quoted-printable codec, Q-codec, and B-codec following
shortly
Oleg
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 02:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oleg,
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27788.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27788.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
ggregory2004/03/18 14:37:39
Added: lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang CharUtilsPerfTest.java
Log:
Tests the difference in performance between CharUtils and CharSet.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
Well I have some interesting numbers, to say the least.
Saying that comparing CharSet to CharUtils make CharSet look bad is an
understatement. Obviously there is room for improvement there.
What is more interesting albeit tangential, is the performace
improvement from Sun 1.3.1_10 to 1.4.2_04,
Gary Gregory wrote:
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc.
Perhaps we could investigate the possibility of having a VFS test server
set up
permanently - that way
Michael Davey wrote:
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc.
Perhaps we could investigate the possibility of having a VFS test server
set up
permanently - that way
That would be great! It is such a pain to set this up every time. To
make things worse, there is some manual set involved, you have to make
sure certain files are in certain places.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: matthew.hawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18,
leosutic2004/03/18 15:14:20
Modified:attributes project.xml
Log:
Added the Jakarta logo and organization name (ASF)
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +6 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/attributes/project.xml
Index: project.xml
leosutic2004/03/18 15:14:40
Modified:attributes maven.xml
Log:
Removed the compiler classes from the Javadoc (who needs 'em there)?
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +0 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/attributes/maven.xml
Index: maven.xml
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define has an issue affecting its community integration,
matthew.hawthorne wrote:
The problem with these types of things is the variations in OS, FTP
servers, HTTP servers, etc. It's impossible to test all of them and
that's where the users are incredibly valuable. But, even if we could
say we're going to test with Apache 2.0 and some version of
On 18/3/04 10:24 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1.5) Interaction With Other Packages
HttpClient relies on:
* Java Development Kit (Version 1.2 or later; 1.3 or later recommended)
I wonder whether this would be the right time
to drop support for JDK 1.2 and require 1.3 ?
I
Yes, that should work. You may want to set the
preemptive authentication flag on the method, to
avoid an authentication required response for
the initial request.
cheers,
Roland
martin hilpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18.03.2004 13:34
Please respond to Commons HttpClient Project
To:
---BeginMessage---
Folks,
I really think Java 1.3 does not bring anything to the table as far as HTTP
communication is concerned. I am not even sure you we need Socket#shutdownOutput() at
all. Currently HttpConnection#shutdownOutput is not used anywhere in HttpClient.
Java 1.4 is a totally
---BeginMessage---
(Some went badly wrong with my previous message. Damn Outlook. Retrying)
Folks,
I really think Java 1.3 does not bring anything to the table as far as HTTP
communication is concerned. I am not even sure you we need Socket#shutdownOutput() at
all. Currently
Yes, 1.3 doesn't bring us much. I think we should stick with 1.2 until
we are ready for 1.4. As Oleg suggested, this probably won't happen
for some time.
Mike
On Mar 18, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
Hello Adrian,
there is reflections stuff in:
HttpConnection - check for 1.3
Oleg wrote:
I really think Java 1.3 does not bring anything
to the table as far as HTTP communication is concerned.
Ok, I agree. Just wanted to make sure we didn't miss a chance.
cheers,
Roland
Hello Martin,
that's probably a missing content encoding or character set
in the file part you are trying to send. This problem pops up
on a regular basis, you will find information in the mailing list
archive not too far back.
By the way, if you expect anyone else to answer your
questions, you
Hi Eric,
By default 20 is max number of total connections. This number will not
be exceeded regardless of the number of hosts being connected to.
There may have been a few API changes between RC1 and 2.0, but they
should be pretty minor. Please have a look at the release notes
Michael Becke wrote:
Hi Eric,
By default 20 is max number of total connections. This number will
not be exceeded regardless of the number of hosts being connected to.
What if maxconnsperhost is maxtotal ? For example, imagine I'm
setting maxconnsperhost to 1000.
Thanks,
Eric
nun habe ich noch das problem das er kein Dateien mit umlauten versenden
kann,z.b Übung1.txt
I guess you're talking about the content-disposition header or
http-headers with umlauts in general - i think there's no standard for
sending them.
First, i have to define a http-header to be more like
There are two exceptions to this. One is in the case of the URL query
string, the other is for some authentication methods.
For more on the query string take a look at
Roland, I have IIS connecting to tomcat containing httpclienttest.war via
iis_redirector, and run httpclienttest against iis.
As you have said, IIS does intercept the header. I can either add the
user/password hardcoded in the httpclienttest to IIS and run the test again,
or I can figure out
Sven
This is not entirely correct. One can still use
HttpMethod#setQueryString(String) to set hand-crafted query string
GetMethod httpget = new GetMethod(http://www.whatever.com/);
NameValuePair[] params = new NameValuePair[] {
new NameValuePair(text, s)
};
I feel like this has been asked before
I'm wondering how I force a socket to close when I'm using this
manager. I couldn't find the api.
Thanks,
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hello Eric,
you send a connection: close header with the request.
I'm not sure whether using HTTP/1.0 has the same effect.
cheers,
Roland
Eric Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19.03.2004 05:04
Please respond to Commons HttpClient Project
To: Commons HttpClient Project
[EMAIL
Hi Dan,
I haven't looked into the test cases yet, so I don't know
about how many uid/pwd combinations we are talking here.
If it's only a few, you could create Windows users for them.
IIS still checks the Auth header, but it lets the request pass
through since it knows the user.
If that is not an
Hi there,
I have a small question regarding cookie handling.
When I execute GetMethod to some host, cookies are returned.
However, each cookie has its version info, like $version=0.
An application of the target host cannot process this properly.
When I took some http traces via IE, no version
70 matches
Mail list logo
