Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agree with Robert's comments and am also +0, with three additional comments=
:
* The ant build depends javamail 1.3.2, while the maven POM references 1.3.=
3.=20
The ant build should be updated to match the POM
Ok, will do.
* It would be good to provide
Author: tcurdt
Date: Mon Sep 19 01:46:24 2005
New Revision: 290094
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290094view=rev
Log:
introduced a CompilationResult, optional CompilatioProblemHandler to come
Added:
Author: tcurdt
Date: Mon Sep 19 01:50:43 2005
New Revision: 290097
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290097view=rev
Log:
uncommented a test due to missing class, renamed ClassTransformer to
ResourceTransformer
Added:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks Don,
I'll try and get round to downloading it and giving it a go in the next 24
hrs.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:11 AM
I've prepared a test release for Commons Validator 1.2.0 beta 1 at
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36708.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36708.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
How about a couple of new methods in MapUtils? I don't exactly know what to
call them, but here's their signature:
public Map fillMap( Map map, Collection objects, Transformer keyTransformer
);
public Map fillMap( Map map, Collection objects, Transformer keyTransformer,
Transformer
How about a couple of new transformer classes (or maybe one smart one) which
transforms either an array or java.util.List into the object within it at a
particular index? We could either create two classes ArrayIndexTransformer
and ListIndexTransformer or we could create one smart one called
I just thought of something. We might add in a special case for String
input. It would return String.charAt( index ) as an object.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 6:57 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi
I want to start working on getting commons-exec used inside Apache Maven
Continuum and would like to review and commit the outstanding patches
before starting on some more heavier work. More on the details in
another mail. As far is I've understood it I can request this karma
because it's only
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36665.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: olegk
Date: Mon Sep 19 13:37:48 2005
New Revision: 290260
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290260view=rev
Log:
PR #36339 (Request is retried if preemptive authentication fails)
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Reviewed by Michael Becke
Modified:
Author: olegk
Date: Mon Sep 19 13:40:38 2005
New Revision: 290263
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290263view=rev
Log:
PR #36339
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1 from me.
- Brett
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Hi
I want to start working on getting commons-exec used inside Apache Maven
Continuum and would like to review and commit the outstanding patches
before starting on some more heavier work. More on the details in
another mail. As far is I've understood
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 16:16 +0200, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Hi
I want to start working on getting commons-exec used inside Apache Maven
Continuum and would like to review and commit the outstanding patches
before starting on some more heavier work. More on the details in
another mail. As far
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've prepared a test release for Commons Validator 1.2.0 beta 1 at
http://people.apache.org/~mrdon/commons-validator
Let me know if there are any problems, otherwise I'll start
working on the official beta release.
It (1.2.0-beta-.5) is working fine here.
Author: rahul
Date: Mon Sep 19 15:49:33 2005
New Revision: 290300
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290300view=rev
Log:
Catching up with the changes document
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
Author: mrdon
Date: Mon Sep 19 16:49:15 2005
New Revision: 290313
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290313view=rev
Log:
Setting source and target for Java 1.3
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/project.properties
Modified:
Whoops, right after I hit enter, I realized I'm not officially on this
project :) I forget the procedure, but anyone mind if I join the fileupload
fun?
Don
On 9/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mrdon
Date: Mon Sep 19 16:49:15 2005
New Revision: 290313
URL:
Don,
I submitted a patch that would enable chain to compile under JDK 1.3
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35390
Niall
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:49 AM
Subject: svn commit: r290313 -
It seems, at least according to chain's project.properties, they are
specifically targetting 1.4 or greater. I don't know if that was the result
of a decision or someone just put that there.
Any convincing argument to keep 1.4 as the minimum JVM version for chain?
Don
On 9/19/05, Niall
Apologies, mental aberation on my part - for some reason I saw fileupload
and my brain registered chain :-o
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:39 AM
Subject:
Author: niallp
Date: Mon Sep 19 18:35:04 2005
New Revision: 290328
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290328view=rev
Log:
Update maven build to include the manifest and readme file in the source distro.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/maven.xml
Modified:
Don,
Looks good to me, only a couple of minor things.
1) I tested both the ant and maven builds using the source distro. The only
problem I had was the ant build was missing the manifest and readme files -
so I've updated the maven build to include these in the source distro.
2) The version
Author: jcarman
Date: Mon Sep 19 20:04:23 2005
New Revision: 290337
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290337view=rev
Log:
Added support for custom JNDI properties.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/proxy/provider/SessionBeanProvider.java
Author: jcarman
Date: Mon Sep 19 20:06:57 2005
New Revision: 290338
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290338view=rev
Log:
Reformatted code.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/proxy/provider/SessionBeanProvider.java
Modified:
36 matches
Mail list logo
