It seems odd that the site (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/io/) is live but
not [announce]'d and the links point to 1.3.1 downloads but are labeled 1.3.2.
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 12:14 PM
To:
Right +1 from me as noted in [1].
Indeed I did comment about maintenance releases needing to be binary compatible
without new features as Apache guidelines note. In this case, I am happy to let
the release manager make the call. I am also happy with the XP release early,
release often. I think
+1, I would also like to see commons project releases say with each release if
they adhere to this charter (as an extra checks and balances thing)
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:19 PM
To: Jakarta Commons
Are we sure we do not want to call this 1.4 since the only change is a _new_
class as opposed to maintenance updates?
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:27 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Hello [io]:
+1
I tested the source distribution with Ant 1.7.0 using: ant clean dist test
testjar and got BUILD SUCCESSFULs using the following Java Dev Kits:
java version 1.4.2_14
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_14-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build
1) Why not deprecate the public fields in HelpFormatter rather than
making them private?
Or calling the release 2.0 with the understanding that a breaking compatibility
is under the charter of major release.
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Torsten:
Where is the site that matches this build?
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:22 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [jci] RC2 available
On every release you (try to) do with
I'm all for it.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:50 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [cli] Minimum JDK version for 1.1?
I'd like to move the minimum JDK version for CLI up to 1.4 for the CLI
1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497532
]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-335:
---
Would Joda-TIme help here?
Comparisons of Dates and Calendars to second
recipient,
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original
message.
Gary Gregory (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497532
]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-335
It seems like a nice coincidence that IO 1.3 is based on JRE 1.3, and we could
have IO 1.4 based on JRE 1.4, IO 1.5 on JRE 1.5 ;)
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:10 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
+1 here
(Selfish POV: The product I work on now requires Java 1.4 already)
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:05 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?
There
+1 to your +1; Release early, release often!
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:43 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: RfC: Release commons-io-1.3.2
+1 to the idea. Release early, release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490375
]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-329:
---
Before we sign off on this I'd like to know why it is pointless and why does
Hi All:
Any guesses on the release schedule?
Thank you.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Seagull Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.seagullsoftware.comhttp://www.seagullsoftware.com
+1.
Tested with:
- Windows XP SP2 + current patches
- Ant 1.6.5: ant clean dist test
- Maven 1.0.2: maven clean site:generate
- Sun Java 1.3.1_15 :ant ok
- Sun Java 1.4.2_13: ant maven
- Sun Java 1.5.0_10: ant maven
- Sun Java 1.5.0_11: ant maven
- Sun Java 1.6.0: ant ok
Maven failures:
-
The following worked for me:
- Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
- Sun Java 1.6.0, 1.5.0_10 and 1.4.2_13
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
- ant clean dist test
- maven clean site:generate
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 10,
+1
Tested with:
- Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
- Sun Java 1.4.2_13
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 5:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
: Bug
Components: Utilities
Affects Versions: 1.3
Environment: Sun Java 1.4.2_13.
Windows XP SP2 + current patches.
Eclipse 3.3M4.
Reporter: Gary Gregory
Assigned To: Gary Gregory
Fix For: 1.4
-Original Message-
From: deng xinzi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory resolved IO-112.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN.
NPE in FileUtils.openOutputStream(File) when file has no parent in path
Hello Xinzi:
I've created this JIRA ticket to track your issue:
[IO-112] NPE in FileUtils.openOutputStream(File) when file has no parent in
path.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-112
I've also committed a fix in SVN. You can rebuild from the SVN sources yourself
or wait for the next
+1.
Builds and tests successful on Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
with:
-Sun Java 1.4.2_13, Ant 1.6.5, Maven 1.0.2
-Sun Java 1.4.2_13, Ant 1.7.0, Maven 1.0.2
-Sun Java 1.5.0_10, Ant 1.6.5, Maven 1.0.2
-Sun Java 1.5.0_10, Ant 1.7.0, Maven 1.0.2
I used:
ant clean dist test testjar
and:
Good idea, +1 here.
Gary
Dennis Lundberg wrote on Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:34 PM:
Hi
Before I dive head-first into this I thought I'd ask first.
I'd like to
unify the M2 generated sites for all sandbox components, by
making use
of commons-skin. This would mean:
Add ArrayUtils.addFirst methods.
Key: LANG-309
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-309
Project: Commons Lang
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Gary Gregory
Hi All:
The release notes state that [lang-69] is fixed, it is not.
I do have a fix in progress but we should probably push this one back to
3.0 unless we want to delay 2.3. If we really want this one fix, I can
take some time to complete this within a week or so.
Thank you,
Gary
Hi:
The release notes should state that [LANG-102] has been fixed.
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 5:37 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [ang] pre 2.3 build
Using:
jvm 1.3 ant
build
You resolved that one as fixed saying:
Fix already in CVS. Please see
HashCodeBuilderTest#testReflectionObjectCycle().
Sounds like it needs to be reopened?
Hen
On 1/2/07, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All:
The release notes state that [lang-69] is fixed
-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:16 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [ang] pre 2.3 build
Check LANG-69's Change History:
Change by Gary Gregory [29/Sep/06 12:55 PM]
StatusIn Progress [ 3 ] Resolved [ 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory reopened LANG-69:
--
Reopening due to an incorrect note in the change history section about
HashCodeBuilder bug [lang-279
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461655
]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-102:
---
Refactored escape and unescape methods to remove code duplication.
[lang
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory updated LANG-102:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
2.3
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461656
]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-102:
---
FWIW, I could not use the attached patch files. They appear to be too old
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory resolved LANG-102.
---
Resolution: Fixed
committed.
[lang] Refactor Entities methods
Hi All:
Interesting and I do see your POV. IMO, it also depends on what tools
you use do to your work. I use the Eclipse Javadoc view which presents
the Javadoc comment in a formatted HTML view. I never bother to use the
source of Javadocs to understand what the comments say as there
usually is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-284?page=comments#action_12461425 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-284:
---
I agree with Stephen
[http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-284#action_12461421], this sounds
complicated enough
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 3:01 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [collections-generics] [PROPOSAL] Remove all author and since
version
tags
As this is a 'new' project, I propose that we:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-291?page=comments#action_12446052 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-291:
---
How about following the naming from Math.min() and Math.max():
public static Date min(Date date1, Date date2);
public static
In my mind, name vs. name2 makes sense seems for a next generation based
on new code rather than a next version.
Thank you,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sandy
McArthur
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:41 AM
To: Jakarta
Hello: Steinar:
The current DoubleMetaphone implementation (released and SVN) allows for
Spanish and Germanic characters, so adding support for other languages
in the same class seems to be in the spirit of the current
implementation.
I would also say that having language-specific
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-284?page=comments#action_12444550 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-284:
---
I think we are going towards a whole new .table package. I like the idea of a
table model with an XML and HTML writer classes
Hello [lang]:
For the software I work on, Java 1.4.2 is the base requirement, so
talking about 1.5 is not an option (yet). We revisit the issue from time
to time, but the bottom line is that our customers have not moved to
Java 1.5, so we cannot.
We could do this in a first stage and say that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-287?page=comments#action_12443559 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-287:
---
The problem with this idea is that when there _is_ something to escape, this
would cause the performance penality of scanning
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-285?page=comments#action_12442938 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-285:
---
Please see the Java 6 implementation for:
http://download.java.net/jdk6/doc/api/java/text/Normalizer.html
I think that going
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-53?page=comments#action_12442740 ]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-53:
---
I just performed:
ant clean dist
with the latest from SVN and all is well (BUILD SUCCESSFUL.)
Please reopen if can
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-53?page=all ]
Gary Gregory updated CODEC-53:
--
Fix Version/s: Nightly Builds
build.xml dist target refers to ../LICENSE
Key: CODEC-53
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-53?page=all ]
Gary Gregory resolved CODEC-53.
---
Resolution: Fixed
build.xml dist target refers to ../LICENSE
Key: CODEC-53
URL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-51?page=comments#action_12442744 ]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-51:
---
Tests pass for me with SVN sources and *Ant 1.6.5* on *Windows XP SP2+patches*
with:
- Sun Java 1.4.2_12
- Sun Java 1.5.0_09
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-40?page=comments#action_12442748 ]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-40:
---
I think it would be nice to have the tests and unit tests cover some simple and
edge cases: null, -1, 0, 1 as well as bogus
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-285?page=comments#action_12442447 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-285:
---
There is a more Unicode way to do this as is outlined in this discussion:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID
How are we doing with the release? Any blockers?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
Looks like it is due to a javadoc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-69?page=all ]
Gary Gregory resolved LANG-69.
--
Resolution: Fixed
[lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-69?page=comments#action_12438787 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-69:
--
Fix already in CVS.
Please see HashCodeBuilderTest#testReflectionObjectCycle().
[lang] ToStringBuilder throws
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-69?page=all ]
Gary Gregory updated LANG-69:
-
Comment: was deleted
[lang] ToStringBuilder throws StackOverflowError when an Object cycle exists
Is SVN down? I am getting the following error:
Gary
Problems reported while synchronizing SVNStatusSubscriber. 0 of 1
resources were synchronized.
An error occurred synchronizing /Apache Jakarta Commons
trunks-proper/lang: Error getting status for resource F/Apache Jakarta
Commons
Hello:
For the site, I think that under Project Reports, the item Cobertura
is a bad idea because it does not describe what it is but rather how
it was created. I care to find the Test Coverage report but I do not
need to know the particular technology that was used in the heading.
2c,
Gary
Hi:
I wish you had not deleted the RC2 because it feels like the errors
listed on:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/site/checkstyle-re
port.html
for:
org/apache/commons/lang/SerializationUtils.java
were not present in RC2.
Am I dreaming? (on this topic ;)
Gary
- so not something that is too
desirable to mess with. From their point of view, someone could have
Cobertura, Clover and JCoverage reports on the same page so you
couldn't call each one of them Test Coverage.
Hen
On 9/27/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
For the site
Our application builds and all tests pass with this version.
+1.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:42 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3
Another
What's left on the to-do list for the next RC?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:36 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] [VOTE] Release 2.2 RC2
I've rolled an RC2, and based on the comments
About the mention that one file was duplicated in the jar file. This is
the default Jar behavior of Ant. From the Ant manual:
duplicate behavior when a duplicate file is found. Valid values
are add, preserve, and fail. The default value is add.
Gary
-Original Message-
From:
This page does not contain any real info:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc2/docs/upgradeto2_2.
html
gg
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:36 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang]
FWIW, I noticed that maven-javadoc-plugin version 1.7 was used to
generate the Javadocs. The current version is 1.8.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:36 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang]
Aside from that, our application builds and all tests pass, so +1 from
here.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 2:27 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [lang] [VOTE] Release 2.2 RC2
This page does not contain any real
I notice that the code coverage report was generated use Cobertura
version 1.6. How about migrating to the current version 1.8?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Our application builds and all tests pass with 2.2-rc1.
So, that's +1.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
I've
- The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it
probably
shouldn't.
Personally, I like having the entire release history. When I upgrade
some old component and I am skipping a version, I like to know what I am
getting, not just what is in the latest.
- the jar is getting a
- the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
Should we plan on delivering whatever we delete, like the enum package,
in a separate jar for backwards binary compatibility?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell
Arg, I just ran into a case in our application where I get a stack
overflow with HashCodeBuilder and cyclical object trees:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-279
I can fix this the same why I fixed ReflectionToStringBuilder.
The question is: do this now or after 2.2?
Gary
Fixed in SVN.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:55 AM
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-lang (in module
jakarta-commons)
failed
To whom it may engage...
This is an
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-8?page=comments#action_12430793 ]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-8:
--
Seems reasonable. Has anyone a first cut on top of from the proposed interfaces
above?
REQ: Streaming codecs
/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, here are some test results for test.time I have:
Compiled with Sun Java 1.4.2_12:
- test.time has 1 failure with Sun Java 1.3.1_15
- test.time passes with Sun Java 1.4.2_12
- test.time passes with Sun Java 1.5.0_08
Doing the same
Hello All:
Unlike version 3.0.1, the 3.1-alpha1 version is not compiled with debug
information.
I think compile.debug = true is a better default.
Thanks,
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thanks Oleg ;)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: svn commit: r432652 -
/jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.properties
Author: olegk
Date: Fri Aug 18
Hi All:
How close are we to an Alpha/Beta for 2.2?
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; things are lighter again now though and unless anyone
wants to jump in I'll get things in motion.
Hen
On 8/16/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All:
How close are we to an Alpha/Beta for 2.2?
Gary
Hello:
In EnumUtils we have:
public static Enum getEnum(Class enumClass, String name)
What I need to ask a List of Enum classes for an Enum:
public static Enum getEnum(List enumClassList, String name)
Is this too odd a case? Should I keep my utility method in my own code?
Your thoughts
Hi All:
When I have the compiler set to Java 1.3.1, I get:
Severity and DescriptionPathResourceLocation
Creation Time Id
The method getCause() is undefined for the type Throwable Apache
Jakarta Commons
trunks-proper/lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/exception
Hello All:
I think the argument for the name change I am hearing is: we are not
formatting a la printf but we are replacing markers with values (and not
formatting those values). Is that right? If that is the case, a
Substitutor name is better.
As a general rule, I do not like or use
Do you'all think the variable code be simpler to groke/reuse for
customers if there we changed the nested classes into 1st class
citizens? Kinda of a side issue I know...
G
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:55 PM
To:
Hello:
Would now be a good time to change the [codec] site to point to Jira
instead of Bugzilla?
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] wrote:
[lang] should be JDK1.2 compliant, although I tend to think of it as
1.3+ with 1.2 at users risk.
Stephen
Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello All:
Based on the project.properties file entry:
maven.compile.source = 1.3
I assume that we are making Java 1.3 the requirement
Hi All:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:03 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Heading towards a Lang 2.2 release?
Is anyone opposed to my starting to put together an rc1 distribution
for Lang 2.2?
Hello All:
Based on the project.properties file entry:
maven.compile.source = 1.3
I assume that we are making Java 1.3 the requirement.
We therefore should not have Java 1.4 dependencies:
Severity and DescriptionPathResourceLocation
Creation Time Id
The method getCause()
Hello All:
At a minimum, I'd like to see MapVariableResolver packge scoped.
Looking at the message thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg78697.html
It seems that another proposal being discussed back in April was to make
some classes /easier/ to reuse and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-267?page=comments#action_12419316 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-267:
---
Is [lang] the right project for this instead of [primitives]? Where do we draw
the line between [primitives] and [lang]?
Support char
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-226?page=comments#action_12416586 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-226:
---
Do you have any time to look at unifying those Gary?
I've just come back from my honeymoon and I will not be able to take the time
Any thoughts on having a 2.3 release that focuses on the 5 enum
issues?
I'm +1. Release early, release often, a la XP.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:45 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang]
Hi:
I think ClassUtils is fine unless it gets to be a giant class.
I think if asking a class for its methods, so asking a ClassUtils for
this info makes sense.
I could see a MethodUtils being useful if one needed to perform
operations on a bunch of methods.
For example:
Method[] methods =
+1
* Cleanup Commons project (we'll still use it as a
catch-all). Delete components/versions.
This does not match:
* Make Bugzilla read-only
What about creating an 'Catch all' product in JIRA and only using JIRA?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL
So... should we dig in to multi-threading issues for 2.2?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:07 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] org.apache.commons.lang.Entities
Gary Gregory wrote
it.
Mostly because:
a) There's no obvious solution
b) It's not an error that is going to cause huge problems. No
exceptions flying around, just a bit of garbage when the code using
the library first starts.
Hen
On 4/28/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... should we dig
Hello:
To top it all off the behavior is probably different b/w Java 1.4 and
1.5.
We could:
- Let users call StringEscapeUtils once to init the data like David
discovered.
- Change the init in Entities to lazy-init methods (which must be
synchronized)
- Change the init in Entities to use an
Tracking with this bugzilla ticket:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39411
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:32 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang
the inner
classes stand alone.
Gary
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:05 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VariableFormatter issues
Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:12 AM
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:12 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VariableFormatter issues
Our favourite 'will this become a templating language' class.
Two issues to ask questions about:
What about switching to Cobertura? http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:22 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [all] Clover version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Refactor away!
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:29 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Entities question
Any ideas why there are unescape(String);String and unescape(Writer,
String)
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 7:23 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] next version etc
snip
36925: Status Gary?
I like the feature and it is done and it tested. The only thing I
can
Hello:
The recent CompositeFormat commits cause warnings:
javadoc:
[javadoc] Generating Javadoc
[javadoc] Javadoc execution
[javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.commons.lang...
[javadoc] Loading source files for package
org.apache.commons.lang.builder...
[javadoc]
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:04 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] next version etc
I want to do something fun...so how about a Lang release.
First up; 2.2 or 3.0? It would be nice to
1 - 100 of 837 matches
Mail list logo
