With the following votes the release of commons jci has passed:
+1 Oliver Heger
+1 Vadim Gritsenko
+1 Phil Steitz
+1 Torsten Curdt
no -1 votes
I will push out the artifacts tomorrow.
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
Builds happily, sigs and hashes are good and everything else looks good to me.
Thanks for rolling the source distro.
Phil
On 6/13/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
Torsten Curdt wrote:
What version of maven are you using? You did mvn install?
Why does it want to load a test jar?
It is sharing code with the core.
cheers
--
Torsten
Ah, I did a mvn package. With mvn install everything works fine. So here
is my +1.
Oliver
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/dists/
These look good, +1.
And maven artifacts are here
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/org/
Torsten Curdt wrote:
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/dists/
These look good, +1.
...
I found problem with missing LICENSE and NOTICE files in:
commons-jci-core-1.0-javadoc.jar
On 13/06/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/dists/
No KEYS file?
There's one in SVN, but it will need to be in dist as well at some point.
On 14.06.2007, at 20:18, sebb wrote:
On 13/06/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/dists/
No KEYS file?
There's one in SVN, but it will need
Only negative I've found is that the distribution files unpack into
the current directory rather than a commons-jci-1.0 or a
commons-jci-1.0-src directory.
Once unpacked, the source does happily rebuild. KEYS are good - using
the BCEL one.
Hen
On 6/13/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Only negative I've found is that the distribution files unpack into
the current directory rather than a commons-jci-1.0 or a
commons-jci-1.0-src directory.
Once unpacked, the source does happily rebuild. KEYS are good - using
the BCEL one.
Hen
I have made similar
On 14.06.2007, at 22:12, Oliver Heger wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Only negative I've found is that the distribution files unpack into
the current directory rather than a commons-jci-1.0 or a
commons-jci-1.0-src directory.
Once unpacked, the source does happily rebuild. KEYS are good - using
From: Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13. Juni 2007 21:06:37 MESZ
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [vote] releasing jci RC4 as 1.0
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds
As (more or less) requested I've also created a source and binary
distributions
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/jci/1.0-RC4/dists/
The website is live
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/
And maven artifacts are here
12 matches
Mail list logo