Re: [all commons] Proposal: CommonsCommons package

2002-06-16 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Commons project itself is now housing separate sub projects which have seemingly their own boundaries Every little part is acting like its own jakarta project. Hell, the votes are even working that way... This guy's been doing some great work with

Re: [all commons] Proposal: CommonsCommons package

2002-06-15 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I know what you mean, but I'm not sure that commoncommons is the answer. IMHO, code in the commons falls into three categories - - Widely used, and often as a group (BeanUtils, Betwixt, Collections, Digester, Logging) - Individual stable, less interrelationships (CLI, Cactus, DBCP, HTTP Client,

Re: Re: [all commons] Proposal: CommonsCommons package

2002-06-15 Thread Juozas Baliuka
Hi, I think the most simple solution is to split redistributables like commons-collections.jar commons-transform.jar . It is nothing bad if some common class is maintained in collections. This requires agreement from collections as its not