Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-23 Thread Adrian Sutton
Hi all, Are there any further comments on this or are we ready to put it to a vote? I have not had any response from any of the inactive committers and figure a week is long enough to wait. They can of course be reinstated as a committer at any time in the future by just requesting it (and

Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-23 Thread Michael Becke
The proposal looks good to me. I think we are ready for a vote. Mike On Mar 23, 2004, at 11:25 PM, Adrian Sutton wrote: Hi all, Are there any further comments on this or are we ready to put it to a vote? I have not had any response from any of the inactive committers and figure a week is

Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-18 Thread Adrian Sutton
On 18/3/04 10:24 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1.5) Interaction With Other Packages HttpClient relies on: * Java Development Kit (Version 1.2 or later; 1.3 or later recommended) I wonder whether this would be the right time to drop support for JDK 1.2 and require 1.3 ? I

RE: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-18 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
To: Commons HttpClient Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level On 18/3/04 10:24 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1.5) Interaction With Other Packages HttpClient relies on: * Java Development Kit

RE: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-18 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
/2004 13:51 To: Commons HttpClient Project Cc: Subject:Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level Hello Adrian, there is reflections stuff in: HttpConnection - check for 1.3 HttpException - check for 1.4 util/ExceptionUtil - check for 1.4 You're right, if getting

Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-18 Thread Michael Becke
? Improved collection classes or so? cheers, Roland Adrian Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.03.2004 13:27 Please respond to Commons HttpClient Project To: Commons HttpClient Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta

RE: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-18 Thread Roland Weber
Oleg wrote: I really think Java 1.3 does not bring anything to the table as far as HTTP communication is concerned. Ok, I agree. Just wanted to make sure we didn't miss a chance. cheers, Roland

Re: [PROPOSAL][DRAFT] Promote HttpClient to Jakarta level

2004-03-17 Thread Adrian Sutton
On 18/3/04 12:54 AM, Jeff Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just the active ones. You must leave off Sun-gu and Sean, since they don't have CLA on file their committer status has been suspended. I agree with Oleg about the handling of the others. Sounds good to me. I'll take care of chasing