Quoting Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tetsuya,
Ceremony. I suspect it that even such a nice community has to
be baptized once. (one day or less)
Legitimatization, in order to keep *consistency* in a big
and social community. To make it orthodox.
No, Incubation has nothing to
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Unrelated to whether or not we would use it, I think that blojsom could
be a
very nice ASF project. From what I have seen of it, I'd support its
entry
to the Incubator.
Does it seem sensible to take an already successful ASL licensed,
community developed piece of
Noel,
Ceremony. I suspect it that even such a nice community has to
be baptized once. (one day or less)
Legitimatization, in order to keep *consistency* in a big
and social community. To make it orthodox.
No, Incubation has nothing to do with pomp and circumstance.
Pomp? .. I do not
I've lost track of who's working on krell nowadays. I'm actually not
as interested in the code as the data. If we had some kind of record
(like a FOAF file) that we stick krell, and planet* and whatever data
in, that would be good. We're starting to have data all over the
place.
I've created a directory 'planet' in the committers CVS. It just
contains the planet config file at the moment. In preparation for
Tom's hosting coming on line, committers can add their entries by
following my example. Ideally this wants to generated from some
centralized record, but I'm
On Jan 11, 2004, at 3:16 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
I've created a directory 'planet' in the committers CVS. It just
contains the planet config file at the moment. In preparation for
Tom's hosting coming on line, committers can add their entries by
following my example.
Done. For those who want to
Ted Leung wrote:
If we had some kind of record (like a FOAF file) that we stick krell,
and planet* and whatever data in, that would be good. We're starting
to have data all over the place. members.txt, urls.txt, and probably
more that I'm not remembering. Be nice to have an authoritative
