Sally Khudairi wrote:
Fellow ASF Community members --
hi sally
We have been working with PhD candidate Roland Schroll over the past two
years as he's been compiling information on the value of the Apache brand.
His advisor is community-based innovation expert Dr. Johann Füller. This is a
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Sally Khudairi wrote:
Fellow ASF Community members --
hi sally
We have been working with PhD candidate Roland Schroll over the past two
years as he's been compiling information on the value of the Apache brand.
His advisor is community-based innovation
Simon Pepping wrote:
Robert,
You recommend that the new key be made the default key. But if it is
only meant to be used for code signing, it cannot be the default key.
Unless this key is on a separate keyring. Right?
a keyring can contain more than one secret key. any secret key in the
ring
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I'm trying to follow the instructions at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key
And am getting [1] below. I think I have a public keyring (I've signed
releases in the past so I thought it should just work). I'm using GPG
2.0.12 on OS X (10.6). I have
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Another question:
When updating my KEYS file (per
http://www.apache.org/dev/key-transition.html#transition-export), do I
replace my old one with the new dual export, or do I append to the
KEYS file?
there's no functional difference (at least during the transition)
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Another question:
When updating my KEYS file (per
http://www.apache.org/dev/key-transition.html#transition-export), do I
replace my old one with the new dual export, or do I append
i've blogged some instructions for generating stronger keys at
http://www.jroller.com/robertburrelldonkin/entry/openpgp_generating_a_strong_key
which i hope can be the basis of apache key generation documentation.
feedback and testing welcomed
- robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
1024 bit keys and SHA-1 links are currently considered safe so there's
no reason to believe that apache keys have been compromised. transition
statements [1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henri Yandell wrote:
Need to update http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html to say
4096 asap I suspect :) Stop new people being lured into this problem.
yes but...
key size isn't the direct cause of the problem: SHA-1 is
AIUI the OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Is it possible to regenerate my gpg key without losing all the signatures on
my existing key?
To bootstrap the new key,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Need to update http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html to say
4096 asap I suspect :) Stop new people being lured into this problem.
i've committed something (as a stopgap measure)
yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
with ApacheConUS only three months away, we really need to start
planning how apache can move away from short keys (DSA and RSA 2048)
and weak WOT links (SHA-1)[1]. the consensus on infra was that this is
the best list for this discussion. if it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:13, Tony Stevenson wrote:
You cannot retrospectively 'upgrade' your key, AIUI, at least.
So you will sadly lose all your signatures as you will need a new
key.
it should be possible to use a script
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[X] +1 Change list settings (allow anyone to subscribe or post)
[ ] -1 Keep the current settings
- - robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Here's an idea I came up with for the proposed Content/Web Technology
track in ApacheCon US 2009:
We'd reserve and mark a table or a corner of the Hackathon area as the
Meet the developers corner where conference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Isabel,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Isabel Drost isa...@apache.org wrote:
...In the past year there have been quite a few Apache events (Bar Camps,
Meetups, User Groups etc.). Actually there were so many, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
this has been in the air for a while. it popped up recently on the
incubator list.
i've create an issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-104) for anyone who has
a comment but doesn't want to join gene...@incubator.apache.org
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
At the ApacheCon we discussed about introducing some generic
topic-based mailing lists at Apache. Currently inter-project
cooperation is a bit difficult as joining another dev@ or user@
mailing list can be a pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On Tue 31 Mar 2009 21:34, Henri Yandell hyand...@gmail.com wrote:
Use community@ - if people get annoyed they'll voice that and the
correct context list can be created. Community gets used so rarely
that I don't have a filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Add your comment to
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_asf_is_ten_years
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 09:24 +0200, berndf wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm forwarding this CfP here as I've participated in the last OpenExpo
in Berne, Switzerland. It was a huge success [1][2]. I hope you'll
excuse that most of the information below is in German. There's some
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 22:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] email drops
-1 because the last thing we need are press and security e-mails getting
dropped on the floor. If the PRC and Security teams, who actually care
about the
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 10:21 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Very nice! I love the compactness and readability of Ruby (no joke!).
If you are interested in a more overengineered solution to that problem,
there is CodeWrestler at
does anyone have any advice/opinions about (cheap) accommodation in
dublin?
(haven't been in that fine city for a decade)
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 20:32 +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:05:40PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
does anyone have any advice/opinions about (cheap) accommodation in
dublin?
snip
Cheaper can be gotten of course, but mainly in the City Centre which
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 14:17 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'd like to mail an informal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that all PMC member
know about that award
Is this appropriate for all PMCs? What makes you believe that they'd care?
who knows whether they'd care? not me...
but IMHO the
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 19:08 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
On 1/5/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm not sure that i'll find the time for an article but - if there
unfortunately isn't anyone out there with a literary itch to scratch - i
will create a basic document over
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 09:07 -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
I'll look at the jakarta lists for how the OT FUD was handled.
LOL!
i hope you're going to be looking for anti-patterns :)
IIRC jakarta didn't exactly have a good record for avoiding flamewars.
back
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 19:22 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:28 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
For crying out loud, would you please supply links to the exact posts
you consider to be in poor taste and the person's name? I just
wasted
10 minutes trying to follow the
IIRC when the legal-discuss mailing list was first created, the idea of
a legal FAQ for committers was floated preferably written by someone
with legal training. AFAIK this hasn't happened yet.
i agree with danny
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-general/200507.mbox/%
[EMAIL
over in jakartaland, we're trying to tidy up the website.
as a result of this, some documents will be removed from the jakarta
site. many of these do or should have replacements at the ASF level.
so, it's become a bit of an initiative to improve the general ASF
documentation as well (including
On 21 Dec 2004, at 19:52, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
snip
Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers
in the
ASL2.0 can be circumvented in nasty ways by a truly malicious
company/individual if that is the intent, SO
On 27 Jun 2004, at 12:23, Greg Stein wrote:
snip
* The Board approved the formation of the Public Relations Committee
(PRC). This new committee replaces the Fundraising Committee and also
rolls in the responsibility and management of our press activities,
public relations, and management of
On 30 May 2004, at 05:58, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
smip
Personally I'm a big believer in no such thing as a dumb question. :
there's no such thing a dumb question, only a dumb answer :
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 13 Feb 2004, at 07:28, Conor MacNeill wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:19:40 -0500, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
See: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3312091
Patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFu=/
netahtm
On 12 Feb 2004, at 22:35, Thom May wrote:
snip
just use (or link to) and update what's already on
www.apache.org/foundation/martin.html ?
There's some sample text on www.apache.org too, courtesy of StevenN
i've added links from the jakarta site to the foundation page. (i'll
leave the jakarta
On 11 Feb 2004, at 17:29, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Jim Jagielski:
I think it would be most appropriate for the ASF
to send some sort of condolences to the Pöschl
family (eg: flowers).
++1
definitely +1
this is certainly a big shock. martin's seems to have been around
jakarta forever
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2003JulSep/0213.
if ISO decides to charge, then will this have an impact on apache products?
if so, is there any action that the ASF can take to influence ISO's
decision?
- robert
On Friday, July 18, 2003, at 11:40 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
snip
Very good points I think.
1. Legal risk
2. where to start as a first step
snip
1.
Sure, I think if the ASF hosts the translated websites, we (sorry: I
prefer to use *WE* when indicationg the ASF) have to think about the
QUALITY of
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 03:00 PM, Thom May wrote:
* Nicola Ken Barozzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Thom May wrote, On 10/07/2003 15.24:
Jakarta has an announcement list. Guess what, most, if not all
announcements go also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go figure.
MHO is that a mail a month is not a
hi Tetsuya
thanks again for all the hard work in the limited time available for
newsletter 9. i'd you like to volunteer to create an xml newsletter as
well as a jakarta one then i'm sure it'd be a great success.
- robert
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 05:41 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thank you
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 06:59 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
snip
- the java world seems to need amazing number of indians (or
committers) relative to lines of codes or bugs fixed. And seems
to see more isolated pockets of people than the xml and other
On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 05:31 AM, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
At 01:09 PM 19/06/2003, you wrote:
Why NOT have shared documents? I've heard it said that the CVS
organization
is the barrier. OK, so why not look at what reasonable steps could
relieve
that barrier? What would happen if we had
we received this a little while ago on jakarta pmc. i'd like to send them
some kind of response.
i'm posting this on community since it seems likely to me that this might
also be of interest to a number of ex-jakarta projects and also that it'd
be good to have a broader set of opinions. (i'll
i think that maybe organization / project would be better that
/project/[subproject/..].
i think that including organization would a good idea for a couple of
reasons. first, it would make it pretty clear that it's an URI is for an
ASF jar. secondly, it would allow expansion later for non-ASF
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 10:22 PM, O'brien, Tim wrote:
Added Clover reports as well. Although, I can't figure out what it means
that Digester has a 0.7% coverage. It is more than possible that I have
configured something incorrectly here.
I'm assuming that all ASF projects have
(i'm not really sure where comments about the main foundation site should
be posted or how to submit patches. hopefully someone will correct me if
this isn't the right place.)
i noticed that http://www.apache.org/foundation/projects.html has an entry
for db.apache.org which is missing a
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
snip
so we must not distribute any 3p (third-party) packages
from asf systems if it is not permitted by their licences.
nor may any of our code automatically go off and fetch
such packages and start using them on the user's
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
so, I wonder, should I go down the path of 'incubation'?, should I move
it under the committers/ CVS? or in the community CVS? move it on
sourceforge? should we clutter this mail list or should we ask for
another
communities can only grow so fast and so large by using osmosis to
transfer ideas.
the incubator will need to be able to tell incubatees the apache resources
at their disposal and the limits beyond which use of these resources
becomes abuse.
i'd like to this kind of information provided to
50 matches
Mail list logo
