--- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > It certainly is easier to migrate content that
> exists, even if it is in
> > the wrong format, than content that does not
> exist.
>
> +1!
>
> as usual, sam demonstrates his uncanny knack to cut
> through the
> pe
Sam Ruby wrote:
It certainly is easier to migrate content that exists, even if it is in
the wrong format, than content that does not exist.
+1!
as usual, sam demonstrates his uncanny knack to cut through the
persiflage to one of the real issues.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini h
> > Because wiki's tend to fill with content rapdily, once you
> > use them for a little while you are pretty much locked in.
> Counterpoint?
Personally, I'm getting mileage out of UseModWiki, despite its issues. I
wouldn't want to have to move every page in the Wiki, but I could cut &
paste the
James Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 23:58, Jeff Turner wrote:
it is better to have ANY Wiki (here, UseModWiki) than try to establish a
nonexistent consensus on which Wiki everyone agrees is best. That can be
sorted out later, if people want it sorted out badly enough.
I agree in general, but
James Taylor wrote:
How viable is it to machine migrate the content?
The UseModWiki content isn't in bare text files, so a little bit of
work will be needed.
Brilliant!
what's yer beef? at least something got *done*!
/me runs away
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Co
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 23:58, Jeff Turner wrote:
> it is better to have ANY Wiki (here, UseModWiki) than try to establish a
> nonexistent consensus on which Wiki everyone agrees is best. That can be
> sorted out later, if people want it sorted out badly enough.
I agree in general, but the Wiki is
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:51:55PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:26:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sometimes it's better to _think_ before talking or doing :-)
> >
> > And it's nothing wrong to think after talking and doing -
> > and make changes and adjustments.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:26:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sometimes it's better to _think_ before talking or doing :-)
>
> And it's nothing wrong to think after talking and doing -
> and make changes and adjustments.
Agreed.
> I don't think open source or "meritocracy" is about doing,
Sometimes it's better to _think_ before talking or doing :-)
And it's nothing wrong to think after talking and doing -
and make changes and adjustments.
I don't think open source or "meritocracy" is about doing,
it's more about feedback and review and improvements.
Costin
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003,
Jeff,
Unless I missed a discussion elsewhere (I'm only on community@ and
infrastructure@, as well as project lists), Andy appeared to be complaining
about (a) people asking for changes to the Wiki without contributing
patches, and (b) the current lack of consensus on how to integrate
push-model in
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:50:55PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:17:38PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > http://www.freeroller.net/page/acoliver/20030108#when_is_community_not_a
> >...
> > - he was criticized for a message that he made
> > in jest, but which wasn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
