I suggest we simply drop the logos and hypertext links for all the mirrors.
We say that people who want to give back to Apache shouldn't care if we put
an @author link in the source code. (And I agree.)
So why not say that mirrors who want to give back to Apache shouldn't care if
we link to
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 02:01, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Right now we have no real policy with regard to Mirrors; essentially
anyone can run a mirror, tell us; we add and they get a logo if they
submit one as a small thank you.
Legally it is entireyly up to the ASF to choose whether to list
Thanks Vadim, I see your points and basically agree - Dirk's proposal
to accept all logos/mirrors with possible exceptions (illegal, banned,
found offensive by many) sounds easier and certainly good enough.
-Bertrand
(BTW, I havent found this playboy logo yet - bear with me, just back
from
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
(BTW, I havent found this playboy logo yet - bear with me, just back
from long holidays ;-)
Here we go:
http://mirrors.playboy.com/icons/playboy.gif
;-)
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 25 août 04, à 15:53, Sam Ruby a écrit :
...What Jim meant when he said that is that people should STOP saying
things like I am begging you!! and God help us all.,
and START making concrete suggestions on how the policy itself should
change...
So how
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 25 août 04, à 15:53, Sam Ruby a écrit :
...What Jim meant when he said that is that people should STOP saying
things like I am begging you!! and God help us all.,
and START making concrete suggestions on how the policy itself
On 26 Aug 2004, at 15:18, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I completely agree with Vadim.
if you don't like to download stuff from playboy.com don't. How hard
is that?
IIUC, the technical issue people are referring to is that the download
page (and the dropdown list of servers to download from) won't
James Mitchell wrote:
[resend]
For the record (and if I wasn't clear before) I am NOT against playboy
being a mirror or Apache using the mirror (whether it is being blocked or
not). I AM against putting a link and/or image that links from Apache to
playboy.
Trust me, I've been all over
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, James Mitchell wrote:
I am begging you!! DO NOT put their logo or link on our (yes,
OUR) web site. You can't even imagine what the media will do with this if
you do. God help us all.
You are exagerating to the extreme.
Go to google and count how many media
On 25 Aug 2004, at 15:53, Sam Ruby wrote:
The closest thing I see to that in your email is a suggestion that we
let the Eclipse Foundation be the final arbiter in who the Apache
Software Foundation will allow to be listed as an official mirror.
... or that the opinions of those who don't run
Right now we have no real policy with regard to Mirrors; essentially
anyone can run a mirror, tell us; we add and they get a logo if they
submit one as a small thank you.
Legally it is entireyly up to the ASF to choose whether to list a mirror
or not.
Recently Playboy.com submitted one. It was
So let me put in my 5 cents into policy II:
- Any company willing too mirror us can do so and can
have their logo+link handled.
- Any submissions meeting the 3 mechanical goals below
will be swiftly handled and added.
Provided that
-They mirror us faithfully
12 matches
Mail list logo
