-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Different thread, so my self-imposed ban does not fully apply. And
I'm speaking up here to once again correct a misstatement.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> The normal oversight process is closely tied to the policies and
> procedures on the ground. Things like
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 December 2004 01:21
> To: community@apache.org
> Subject: RE: Is ASL2.0 not "GPL-compatible" ??
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
&g
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Will the ASF shield me?
In normal cases - yes as it is in the interest of the ASF community and
codebase long term. And we are in it for the long term.
However if you go outside the CLA and the normal oversight process and
that is what causes the
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 17:12, Henning Schmiedehausen dijo:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:28 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo:
>
>> AFAIK there is no a clausule telling: "All committers or members, except
>> Stephen" ;-)
>
> You
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:28 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo:
> AFAIK there is no a clausule telling: "All committers or members, except
> Stephen" ;-)
You don't seem to have access to the purple files...
Regards
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 03:52 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Now, hasn't their been licensing disputes from (L)GPL camps, IIRC JBoss??
> Where they were accusing the ASF of breach of licensing.
> Can't ASF pay back with the same coins, referring to their own authority
> (FSF)
> about that the lice
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Will the ASF shield me?
I doubt it. I really doubt it.
Stephen.
Why do you say things like this? Do you fail to understand this is
the primary reason for the establishment of the ASF.
s/Do//
Am Dienstag, den 21.12.2004, 20:15 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> in europe at least, it's very likely that this won't really matter.
>
> by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to
> be enforceable by criminal sanction. ...
I don't think so. The winds are chang
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 05:23, Scott Sanders wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> > Will the ASF shield me?
> > I doubt it. I really doubt it.
> Why do you say things like this? Do you fail to understand this is the
> primary reason for the establishment of the
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 04:59, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > pliant european legal system (UK law, for example). i don't see any way
> > in which the ASF could act to help release managers faced with the
> > criminal law in europe
> Als
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo:
> Will the ASF shield me?
> I doubt it. I really doubt it.
> Stephen.
Why not Stephen? In all stuff related to the ASF I guess the answer is a
clear yes as whatever other ASF committer or member. Why you doubt it?
AFAIK there is no a
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
There is a lot of due process to ensure that any release which goes
out is
an ASF release and that any deceisions are taken by the committers
with a
proper vote and with proper oversight by the board of directors. As
long
as committers stick to
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2004 21:59
> To: community@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is ASL2.0 not "GPL-compatible" ??
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
On 21.12.2004, at 21:15, robert burrell donkin wrote:
by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to
be enforceable by criminal sanction. any company wanted to maliciously
damage an open source project would only have to target individual
european release managers using th
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers
> > in the ASL2.0 can be circumvented in nasty ways by a truly malicious
> > company/individual if that is
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 14:15, robert burrell donkin dijo:
> On 21 Dec 2004, at 19:52, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>
>
>> Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers
>> in the
>> ASL2.0 can be circumvent
On 21 Dec 2004, at 19:52, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers
in the
ASL2.0 can be circumvented in nasty ways by a truly malicious
company/individual if that is the intent, SO the
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
The Jini technology is going Open Source and I think that is great, and even
though I tried hard, it will not be under a ASL2.0 license, mos
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
The Jini technology is going Open Source and I think that is great, and even
though I tried hard, it will not be under a ASL2.0 license, most likely the
MIT license.
Furthermore,
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2004 23:54, Joshua Slive wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Does anyone know, and preferably have any authorative-like links ??
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
thanks!!!
Of far more int
On Monday 20 December 2004 23:54, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Does anyone know, and preferably have any authorative-like links ??
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
thanks!!!
--
+--//---+
/ http:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
...
Does anyone know, and preferably have any authorative-like links ??
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Does anyone know, and preferably have any authorative-like links ??
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Joshua.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
23 matches
Mail list logo
