Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: we need to build 'better communities' and 'more tolerance' inter-project as well as intra-project. Bingo. -- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-13 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Costin Manolache wrote: > > So far it seems Stefano ( who is not currently a very active tomcat > developer) is pissed off by the decisions made on tomcat-dev. > I don't see too many tomcat developers flaming each other. the tomcat developers are not all that matter, though. users matter (it sou

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Alright, here you go. Get it out of your systems so I hear 3.3 was a total waste of time and that 4.0 was the best thing ever and that 4.0 is way faster than 3.3. So I hear 4.0 was a big evil conspiricy on the part of Sun via Craig McClanahan who is really a dro

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-13 Thread Glenn Nielsen
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:18:36PM -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Alright, here you go. Get it out of your systems > > > so I hear 3.3 was a total waste of time and that 4.0 was the best thing > ever and that 4.0 is way faster than 3.3. > > > > So I hear 4.0 was a big evil conspiricy

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-12 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Alright, here you go. Get it out of your systems so I hear 3.3 was a total waste of time and that 4.0 was the best thing ever and that 4.0 is way faster than 3.3. So I hear 4.0 was a big evil conspiricy on the part of Sun via Craig McClanahan who is really a drone for the borg and Scot

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 12 Nov 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: 12 Nov 2002 09:58:04 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: community@apache.org > To: Community > Subject: Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?) > > So far it seems Stefano ( who is not cur

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-12 Thread Costin Manolache
So far it seems Stefano ( who is not currently a very active tomcat developer) is pissed off by the decisions made on tomcat-dev. I don't see too many tomcat developers flaming each other. IMHO most ( or all ) tomcat developers agree that both code bases had some good and some bad parts. I also th

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-12 Thread Henri Yandell
First time I've ever seen it discussed. Was an interesting discussion for a while until I hit the point of: "Okay, go write this up on a webpage so it makes sense. " On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > The Apache Jakarta Law: > > Any discussion regarding Apache Jakarta will eventuall

The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

2002-11-12 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
The Apache Jakarta Law: Any discussion regarding Apache Jakarta will eventually degrade into a discussion about the Tomcat 3.3/4.0 issue, often including a full re-analysis of the events, revision of the history, and sometimes degrading into a full re-enactment of the emotionally charged flamewa