Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:
I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.
I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure
now.
[and this was obviously meant to be sent to the list]
Simon Norberg wrote:
Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:
I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.
I
Am 20.04.2007 um 08:48 schrieb Raphaël Jacquot:
I'm still wondering *why* we need to use an AGPS device that's so dumb
that it needs the *host* to do most of the calculations, when we could
have used a SIRF-STAR III sensor, that does everything inside, just
like
the GSM/GPRS module.
I
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:26 +0200, Simon Norberg wrote:
Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:
I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.
I don't think
On Friday 20 April 2007 09:16, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I would suspect: size, matching interfaces, availability, cost of
additional components?
When I worked on similar things, cost and updates were the two main reasons.
Sizewise often there wasn't such a big difference, cost was very
I'd like to be able to do most things without menus or buttons, just
learned interaction.
Sorry to remind this, but we have been thinking of such controls, with
simple mockups:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/UI_Improvements#Using_simple.2C_localized_warp_as_modifier_key
These controls are
I have raised the question about this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] long
time ago. Similar issue to Wifi driver, but different decision.
However, I think we have to understand that building everything from
free/open source in the expected timeline is not that easy.
cheers,
--rd
On 4/20/07, Simon
2007/4/20, Hans van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:26 +0200, Simon Norberg wrote:
Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:
I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ryan Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 20, 2007 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: picture viewer
To: Florent THIERY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we're going to have a mokofingerwheel on the map interface, why not allow
finger wheel up to zoom out and finger wheel down
The problem I have with double tap zooming is that I'd like to have
smooth zooming. I also don't like drawing a box for zooming but rather
the picture reacting instantly to my motion. Not sure how well the
first gen hardware will handle this, though.
Ortwin
On 4/19/07, Steven Milburn [EMAIL
Ortwin Regel wrote:
The problem I have with double tap zooming is that I'd like to have
smooth zooming. I also don't like drawing a box for zooming but rather
the picture reacting instantly to my motion. Not sure how well the
first gen hardware will handle this, though.
true, that iphone zoom
If you want smooth scrolling, how about this mod to what I said earlier:
On the double-tap to center-and-zoom, hold the the second tap. The pic
slowly (human speed) zooms and centers to where you're touching. When
you've zoomed in enough, lift the finger. This would be similar to the way
Interesting... However, what about zooming out again? Also this would
take too much time while possibly being too fast for my grandparents.
Holding the second tap is a bad idea but dragging it around might be a
good one. All in all, how about this:
drag finger -- drag viewable area
tap, then tap
13 matches
Mail list logo
