Hi,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:15:22AM +, Dmitry Shalnoff wrote:
thank you very much for answer and all hints and links!
BTW, the bass rework looks very similar to what i was doing, i wonder
who did that :) too bad it looks like i didn't warn everyone strong
enough (though i did put a big
I hope you can bring the board back to life! Best of luck for that.
How satisfied were you with the battery (lifetime / decrease in storage
capacitance over time?) as it seems to be quite a good bargain.
br
robin
___
Openmoko community mailing
hi
as navit is available for both the debian-squeeze and qtmoko directly but only
in rather old versions I was wondering how much expertise it takes to build
newer packages of one/both of them. So if it was not too complex I would like to
pick it up an publish newer version which I will then try
Hi
Using QtMoko, the easy way IMHO is pinning a newer package of navit from
the Debian Wheezy repository.
But pay attention that pinning navit from wheezy:
- you'll probably be able to use it from QX but I don't know if it will
work directly in QtMoko in the framebuffer;
- you'll have to
Hi,
at [1] are precompiled binaries for gta02 of latest svn version from
navit. They worked on debian and shr the last time i tried them.
Ciao,
Rainer
[1] http://download.navit-project.org/navit/openmoko/svn/
Am 23.12.2012 10:04, schrieb robin:
hi
as navit is available for both the
hi,
I have a minute problem/question: I would like to know what qtmoko version is
actually installed on my phone. I did upgrade to v48.1 using the debian package,
but now if I open the SystemInfoApp it still shows me v46 which was the original
version I flashed using dfu-utils.
br
robin
thanks for the link. do you know if there is a simple way for dpkg to handle opk
files?
I tried but got the expected(!) error:
dpkg: error processing ./navit-current_armv4t.opk (--install):
package architecture (armv4t) does not match system (armel)
Errors were encountered while processing:
robin spielr...@web.de writes:
newer packages of one/both of them. So if it was not too complex I
would like to
In Debian you can try this by adding
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy main
to /etc/apt/sources.list and executing
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get build-dep navit
Dmitry Shalnoff shaln...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list!
Is there anybody have broken screen GTA02 for sale?
or maybe intact PCB after upgrade to GTA04?
I'll be appreciate for reasonable price or maybe somebody just could
give it for free (almost free) after upgrade.
Sure, you can have my
BTW, the bass rework looks very similar to what i was doing, i wonder
who did that :) too bad it looks like i didn't warn everyone strong
enough (though i did put a big fat warning on the rework page) when i
discovered the shield must be additionally insulated after the rework,
i apologise for
On 23/12/12 08:58, robin wrote:
I hope you can bring the board back to life! Best of luck for that.
I hope so...
How satisfied were you with the battery (lifetime / decrease in storage
capacitance over time?) as it seems to be quite a good bargain.
generally not bad. after 3 years of
I guess it is 48-1 and only the system information is not updated after
upgrading
the deb file
root@neo:~# dpkg -la | grep qtmoko
ii linux-image-2.6.34-qtmoko-gta02 48-1 Linux 2.6.34 kernel image for Openmoko
GTA02 Neo FreeRunner
Hi
QtMoko v48 on GTA02 here, I tryed some of the new apps added to the
QtMoko Apps page.
The installation processes all failed with some errors about the
dependencies, but it was sufficient to install them manually.
Minitube does not work (but I do not expect that it works well on the
I also have a complete gta02 a5 with buzz fix, screen intact. It used to
work fine but laid unused uncharged for over 12 months and now does not
show any signs of life even when plugged in and power button pressed, so it
is difficult to know its state.
I'm in Australia. Any reasonable offers.
14 matches
Mail list logo
