On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Franky Van Liedekerke
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
>>
>> > did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
>>
>> I think he's using the latest (as I write) sn
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
>
> > did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
>
> I think he's using the latest (as I write) snapbuild from here:
>
> http://trac.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved/wiki/
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
> did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
I think he's using the latest (as I write) snapbuild from here:
http://trac.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved/wiki/SnapBuilds
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbo
> Seems that this hasn't yet been 100% solved. I'm using QT Extended
> Improved 20090316 and my friend reported hearing bad echo when he
> called me today. I'm pretty sure that it was the first call since
> boot, so it's likely that none of the places in the code that the echo
> suppression is act
Seems that this hasn't yet been 100% solved. I'm using QT Extended
Improved 20090316 and my friend reported hearing bad echo when he
called me today. I'm pretty sure that it was the first call since
boot, so it's likely that none of the places in the code that the echo
suppression is activated had
Am Do 12. März 2009 schrieb Al Johnson:
> I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
> etc. but not when answering a call. It seems like it needs adding there too
to
> fix this for some people. AFAIK we never did find out why the echo/nr
settings
> are persist
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Chris Samuel wrote:
> I couldn't figure out where to insert that AT command when a call was
> received
I've just sent a patch to the list that inserts those AT commands when we
process a CNAP message from the network, which is hopefully an incoming call.
Completely un
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Al Johnson wrote:
> I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
> etc. but not when answering a call.
Yup, I agree, I just can't find anything in the OpenMoko library that gets
called at that point where I can insert it!
--
Chris Samu
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, HouYu Li wrote:
> Just had a test, when someone call my freerunner, he or she still can hear
> the echo. but when calling someone from my freerunner, no echo.
That's weird, as on QtE 4.4.2 I've had no reports of that when people are
calling me.
I couldn't figure out
I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
etc. but not when answering a call. It seems like it needs adding there too to
fix this for some people. AFAIK we never did find out why the echo/nr settings
are persistent for some people and not for others.
On Tuesda
// name on an call. Only supported on some networks.
> > chat( "AT%CNAP=1" );
> > @@ -738,6 +746,9 @@ void NeoModemService::wake()
> >
> > // Re-enable signal quality notifications when the system wakes up
> > again.
> > chat( "AT%CSQ=1
ystem wakes up
> again.
> chat( "AT%CSQ=1", this, SLOT(mcsqOn()) );
> +
> +// Turn on echo suppression and noise reduction.
> +chat( "AT%N0187" );
> }
>
> void NeoModemService::mcsqOff()
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
>
> __
HouYu Li,
was the FR suspended when you received the call (i.e. did the call wake
your FR), or was it on ?
Filip.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:08:58 +0100, HouYu Li wrote:
> Just had a test, when someone call my freerunner, he or she still can
> hear
> the echo. but when calling someone from my
Just had a test, when someone call my freerunner, he or she still can hear
the echo. but when calling someone from my freerunner, no echo.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, HouYu Li wrote:
>
> > The binary with your echo suppression patch is now ava
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, HouYu Li wrote:
> The binary with your echo suppression patch is now available at
> http://dashi-x02.karadog.net/~lihouyu/qtextended/snapbuild/. build
> 20090310.
Wow, that's fast work! Thanks!
Have you tried the 4.4.3 version out yet ?
--
Chris Samuel : http://ww
The binary with your echo suppression patch is now available at
http://dashi-x02.karadog.net/~lihouyu/qtextended/snapbuild/. build 20090310.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:31 PM, HouYu Li wrote:
> OK. I have committed your patch to my main repository. Now building
> binaries.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009
OK. I have committed your patch to my main repository. Now building
binaries.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
> The original Qt Extended 4.4.3 initially set both echo
> suppression and noise reduction in separate AT commands
> which might result in the second command negating
The original Qt Extended 4.4.3 initially set both echo
suppression and noise reduction in separate AT commands
which might result in the second command negating the
first one. It also only set them for outgoing calls.
This new version uses the AT command to set both
echo suppression and noise red
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:37:41 +1100
Chris Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 4:11:15 pm Chris Samuel wrote:
>
> > So I went back to the drawing board and changed it to use the
> > AT%N0187 command to enable both noise reduction and echo
> > suppression in one hit
>
> I've posted the patch *and* t
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 4:11:15 pm Chris Samuel wrote:
> So I went back to the drawing board and changed it to use the AT%N0187
> command to enable both noise reduction and echo suppression in one hit
I've posted the patch *and* the compiled version of the resulting
libneovendor.so library on my blog
Hi all,
My previous patch for echo suppression was completely bogus, once I'd figured
out I could get the logging program to record all AT commands to the modem it
was obvious that it wasn't sending the intended command asides from when an
outgoing call occured (which is what the original QtE d
21 matches
Mail list logo