On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:48:08AM +0200, Aloril wrote:
Wild guess: some of vendor-specific, proprietary TI AT commands allow
user to write/read GSM module flash.
I do not think so ;)
--
- Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openmoko.org/
Salve Harald!
Harald Welte schrieb am Samstag, den 03. Februar 2007 um 14:49h:
I put the list into the wiki - it would be fine to mark
out which are not the optional ones and how to use them.
So from this list, every contribution, commentation of
this commands are welcome.
For
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 12:04 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:11:53AM -0800, Dimitris Kogias wrote:
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip?
Sure. We're
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:11:53AM -0800, Dimitris Kogias wrote:
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip?
Sure. We're using a Ti Calypso chipset. Unfortunately this stuff is all
Salve Harald!
Thank you for the list.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Harald Welte wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:11:53AM -0800, Dimitris Kogias wrote:
Isn't the AT-capable port going to be available to userland via a serial
abstraction? If so, its AT command profile won't be a secret very long.
On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip?
Sure. We're using a Ti Calypso chipset. Unfortunately this stuff is all
under _super_ NDA :-(
AKA: If I post a datasheet I would get the CEO of FIC fired within 24 hours
;-)
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip?
Sure. We're using a Ti Calypso chipset. Unfortunately this stuff is all
under _super_ NDA :-(
Isn't the AT-capable port going to be available to
7 matches
Mail list logo