Xavier Cremaschi a écrit :
> Secondly, I can now launch Paroli but I have dbus timeout, so no GSM at
> all. I can see some warnings in frameworkd.log but no error.
> What can I do to get my phone capacity back ?
Problem was : this frameworkd requires fso-abyss, which was not
installed (nor in d
rongly suggest
> to install SHR or another distro of your choice. OM2009 is (to the best
> of my knowledge) at this point of time unmaintained and more or less
> discontinued. Refer to emails sent earlier about this subject.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> Xavier Cremaschi wrot
Hi Xavier,
Though this is probably not what you want to hear, I'd strongly suggest
to install SHR or another distro of your choice. OM2009 is (to the best
of my knowledge) at this point of time unmaintained and more or less
discontinued. Refer to emails sent earlier about this su
Hi folks,
I have broken my distrib this morning while doing opkg upgrade.
Firstly Paroli does not work because of missing libs, so I made some
(lots of) symlinks like
libelementary.so.0 --> libelementary-pre-svn-ver-.so.0
I have no problem with renaming lib but then please update paroli
On 9/6/09, Laszlo KREKACS wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
>> now if you want to disable the shr phone apps without removing them
>> comment
>> all of the lines out in
>>
>> /etc/X11/Xsession.d/89notifier and /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80ophonekitd
>
> If you comment out 80o
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> now if you want to disable the shr phone apps without removing them comment
> all of the lines out in
>
> /etc/X11/Xsession.d/89notifier and /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80ophonekitd
If you comment out 80ophonekitd, there will be no sound when you
are
Hey,
just wanted to add another 2-cents to the bucket, which by now should
contain a lot of small change ...
Reading some of the mails in this thread I think we need to get the
definitions straight:
- fso - phoning middleware
- shr - a distro which comes with fso preinstalled
- om2009
Am Freitag, den 28.08.2009, 21:09 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Krzyszkowiak:
> Oh guys... I'm SHR developer (once I tried Om2009), but... regarding
> stablity, SHR and FSO is mainly the same! We both use FSO and we both
> are affected by FSO bugs. And most of bugs regarding phone
> f
Angus,
thanks a lot for your fantastic work on Om2009.
It didn't go where we wanted it to go, but still covered a lot of ground.
I guess I will switch to SHR too then (good instructions!) :-)
Keep in touch,
Wolfgang
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:09:49PM -0600, Angus Ainslie wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After some deliberation and input from the community I am going to stop
> maintaining Om2009. I'm going work on getting paroli to co-exsist in SHR.
>
> If you want to try and run paroli in SHR unstable RF
Hi All,
After some deliberation and input from the community I am going to stop
maintaining Om2009. I'm going work on getting paroli to co-exsist in SHR.
If you want to try and run paroli in SHR unstable RFN. Flash the latest shr-
unstable image.
http://shr.bearstech.com/shr-unstable/i
On 8/28/09, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>> OM2009 users: are you successfully using your Freerunners as phones
>> (also picking up calls)? Or just for non-phone purposes?
>
> Yes, om2009 unstable.
>
> (but I
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> OM2009 users: are you successfully using your Freerunners as phones
> (also picking up calls)? Or just for non-phone purposes?
Yes, om2009 unstable.
(but I still vote for going to SHR :)
r
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:21 -0400 schrieb Warren Baird:
> I must admit that I switched from OM2009 to SHR-U about a month ago
> now, since it looked like nothing was happening.
>
> I must admit that aside from Paroli (which apparently is coming soon
> to SHR-U - or alr
>but identifying which -U images are fully-functional and which are
>boxes of part-broken bits seems a bit of a black art. any of you SHR
>chaps car e to tell us OM2009 stick-in-the-muds how the knowledge of
>which releases are functional and which are less so is transmitted?
>an
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Xavier Cremaschi wrote:
Angus Ainslie a écrit :
Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain
Om2009. From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber
OM users by ~ 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think
Om2009
don't see how is it worse than having OM2009
distribution. On the other hand if I would have OM2009 it will take
much more effort to install SHR functionality to it.
Just my 2 cents.
Leonti
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Jan Vlug wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Angus,
First I want to thank you for your work on Om2009.
This is what I like about Om2009:
* Paroli
* Focus on stability / a working phone
* bind_home directory
I played around with SHR as well, and I think that the items mentioned
above are
On 8/27/09, Laszlo KREKACS wrote:
> However your message generated lot of response, but the main
> shr developers didnt speak up.
That idea (abbandoning om2009 in favor of shr-testing and -stable)
came from PaulFertser, DocScrutinizer and few core SHR developers, so
I don't think our
-testing and -stable releases are possible, it's just a matter manpower. Right
now, most of the people working on SHR are also developers, who -- by nature
of the development process -- need to work on the unstable distro while
they're developing their apps.
I don't think anyone in the SHR team
ly the same thing.
Om2007 and Om2008 did not use FSO, so SHR was a community project made
to put FSO into them. But the idea behind Om2009 is basically Om2008+FSO
AFAIK, so yes they should be very similar.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@l
Michal Brzozowski a écrit :
> Then just flush one of the SHR-u images that people report as stable and
> don't upgrade... That's what I do.
I like small fixes, and I don't like huge breaking changes, nor this
idea of a "unstable, which is stable, which is not so stable please wait
before upgrad
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> Simply because it is stable, and stays stable. And all we would get is
> simply one distro less, and no adding value anywhere.
Oh, and dont forget some really nice features of om2009.
One of them is the "bind-home" method w
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
> From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is a wo
I must admit that I switched from OM2009 to SHR-U about a month ago now,
since it looked like nothing was happening.
I must admit that aside from Paroli (which apparently is coming soon to
SHR-U - or already there), it wasn't obvious to me what the difference in
goals were - the two environ
2009/8/27 Xavier Cremaschi
> Risto H. Kurppa a écrit :
> > Sorry to tell you but this is because there have been no changes in
> > OM2009 -> nothing that could break anything.
> > SHR instead is developed all the time -> changes when upgrading ->
> > things mi
Risto H. Kurppa a écrit :
> Sorry to tell you but this is because there have been no changes in
> OM2009 -> nothing that could break anything.
> SHR instead is developed all the time -> changes when upgrading ->
> things might eventually break..
True, but as my gsm, my g
On August 27, 2009 12:53:44 am Ken Young wrote:
> > This should not be interpreted as paroli being abandoned as paroli is in
> > the SHR feeds. I haven't tested it, but getting it to work would be one
> > of my first tasks if it doesn't.
>
> paroli has a LOT of fans, and your work on it is greatly
[cut]
> Sorry to tell you but this is because there have been no changes in
> OM2009 -> nothing that could break anything.
That is the virtue os stable release.
--
Kind Regards, Patryk "LeadMan" Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
() ascii ribbon
Xavier Cremaschi wrote:
Angus Ainslie a écrit :
Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
>From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Xavier Cremaschi wrote:
> - usable (hi Paroli !)
Availabe now/soon for SHR too
> - stable while upgrading : I was used to break lots of things while
> upgrading my SHR-U, it's far better with Om2009
Sorry to tell you but this is because ther
Angus Ainslie a écrit :
> Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
> From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is a worthy
> venture or should I
Please people, stick to the subject!
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
rakshat hooja schrieb:
>
>
>
> SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my
> FreeRunner. I used
> to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a
> reboot
> quite easily!
>
> Rui
>
> _
>
>
>
> Some days SHR-U is very stable and sometimes it
Benderz wrote:
> > > > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> > > > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
> > > > yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means &
I think the post was about something different, so please guys, be smart as
you sure are.
Dear Angus,
I think that previous posts are indeed encouraging! And, as you can see,
paroli is well apppreciated. AFAICU shr is the best choice for "our" future,
and indeed having a working phone app (actuall
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:05:52PM +0200, Marcel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva
> Seabra:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why
>
>
>
> > Some of us can fix the SHR-U latest by
> > downgrading+upgrading+force overwriting some stuff etc but for a
> newcommer
> > to SHR testing build that has atleast gsm+gps working on "2nd boot" is
> > required so that he/she atleast gets a chance to experience SHR instead
> of
> > thinking
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:57:18PM +0530, rakshat hooja wrote:
> > SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used
> > to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot
> > quite easily!
> >
> > Rui
>
> Some days SHR-U is very stable and sometimes
>
>
>
> SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used
> to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot
> quite easily!
>
> Rui
>
> _
>
Some days SHR-U is very stable and sometimes it is not as all the latest
bleeding stuff comes in. Some of
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva
Seabra:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now som
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
> yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR mea
I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE
hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stabi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:39:06PM -0600, Angus Ainslie wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
>From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
>7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone sti
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:01 +0300 schrieb Risto H. Kurppa:
> Did I already post this for everyone to read:
> http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2009/01/building-community-around-your-foss.html
> - anyway, read it again, it's a great post.
Wow, read it only halfways through but it already seems gr
Angus, a lot of respect goes to you for asking the opinion of the
community and listening to our needs!
To me it looks like moving over to SHR makes sense: focusing all
available resources and skills on one distro instead of trying to keep
OM2009 alive with waayy too little resources. I believe
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 02:53 -0400 schrieb Ken Young:
> Angus Ainslie Wrote:
>
> > Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
> > From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
> > 7:1. So what I'
Dnia 2009-08-26, śro o godzinie 19:21 +0300, Risto H. Kurppa pisze:
> You can try this:
> http://kurppa.fi/freerunner/config_files/gsmhandset.state (copy to ..
> hmm.. let me try.. /usr/share/openmoko/scenarios )
I'll try those also if you do not mind. I am still looking for good
scenarios. I still
Angus Ainslie Wrote:
> Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
> From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is a worthy
> venture or should I mov
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
[...]
> Now I have a question of all of you. Should I continue to maintain Om2009.
> From the recent poll by rhk it seems that SHR users outnumber OM users by ~
> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om20
2009/8/27 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:39:06PM -0600, Angus Ainslie wrote:
>> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is a worthy
>> venture or should I move over to SHR and see what help I can be there.
>
> (...)
>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:39:06PM -0600, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> 7:1. So what I'd like to know is does anyone still think Om2009 is a worthy
> venture or should I move over to SHR and see what help I can be there.
(...)
> This question also has a caveat. Before the end of the m
ld be the ideal phone environment for me.
But I'm probably biased as I use SHR-U as my daily phone. ;)
Thanks for all the work on paroli and om2009 though Angus!
As I mentioned above, I really like paroli, and appreciate all the hard work
you have put in thus far and hope that you continue!
P
Hi All,
I've been encouraged by a couple of persistent community members to post an
update to Om2009. First ( other than taking some time off for the summer ) I'll
tell you what I've been working on.
I've been working on getting the 2.6.30 kernel with openwrt patches runn
You can try this:
http://kurppa.fi/freerunner/config_files/gsmhandset.state (copy to ..
hmm.. let me try.. /usr/share/openmoko/scenarios )
Or do the opkg magic mentioned above
r
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi
__
[cut]
> The sound has been described as
> BRRiKKKiRRRiRRiZZiZZZSCH
Congratulations! You have just found undocumented function of FreeRunner
- it translates your voice to BrikiriZsh language ;)
> I *guess* I messed up the alsa-state
> files permanently. What's the easiest
> way to revert them back
On August 26, 2009 09:13:11 am pike wrote:
> I *guess* I messed up the alsa-state
> files permanently. What's the easiest
> way to revert them back to their original
> settings ? I was thinking to opkg-remove,
> opkg-install something ?
>
opkg install -force-reinstall openmoko-alsa-scenarios
Angu
Hi
I opened up alsamixer and fiddled with
most of the 96 sliders. And now, my phone
makes a horrible sound (apparently)
on the other end of a phone conversation.
The sound has been described as
BRRiKKKiRRRiRRiZZiZZZSCH
I *guess* I messed up the alsa-state
files permanently. What's the easiest
wa
My bluetooth keyboard also works very well on my freerunner.
(I have an iGo Stowaway keyboardwhich i would highly recommend...its
very nice!)
-Dan Staley
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Tim Abell wrote:
> for reference, attached is some output from hcidump & lsmod on my laptop,
> where I a
for reference, attached is some output from hcidump & lsmod on my
laptop, where I am able to connect and use the keyboard successfully.
Tim
laptop.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmok
restarting a couple of times lets me use paroli, gps and everything
with no problems! I actually was able to run 4 apps at the same time
using gps, not bad! And Paroli connects to gsm networks nicely.
Thanks!
r
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi
_
I reflashed om2009 (latest unstable) only to see that paroli can't
always login to network (well actually now that I mention it, I was
able to see it also on the previous isntallatin - paroli often gave me
the about 10 error messages..)
here are last lines from /var/log/paroli.log
On 8/7/09, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
>> This might be because my application does not request the GSM ressource.
>> Thus, if GSM is not up and running, requested by another application, I
>> am not sure of how nice it handles it.
>
> Thats what I thought. Requesting the GSM resource might be a good
>
comments inline
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Onen wrote:
>
> I changed the subject, in order to try bringing attention to your
> timeouts issues...
good
> > If paroli doesn't run, it wont start at all.
>
> This might be because my application does not request the GSM ressource.
> Thus, if GS
I changed the subject, in order to try bringing attention to your
timeouts issues...
Hi Risto,
let's see how I can help you!
Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
>
> If paroli doesn't run, it wont start at all.
This might be because my application does not request the GSM ressource.
Thus, if GSM is not u
Hi!
I'm travelling with om2009 unstable from about 2 weeks ago. I'm having
hard time running openbmap and recording cells, most of the times it
crashes when I try to start it.
If paroli doesn't run, it wont start at all.
I have some problems with GPS, I feel that Tangogps or openb
t;> the plan.
>> Adding features to paroli right now has been opted against as
>> Angus and I
>> still hope to be able to release Om2009. This requires bug-fixing
>> not new
>> features.
>> I am also collaborating with Mirko from OpenWrt to get paroli fully
&
the apps into paroli. MDT of pyneo who has started 2 branches has taken over the part of doing maintenance on paroli's core (formerly tichy) and this is still the plan.
> Adding features to paroli right now has been opted against as Angus and I
> still hope to be able to release Om200
branches has taken over the part of doing maintenance on paroli's
core (formerly tichy) and this is still the plan.
Adding features to paroli right now has been opted against as Angus
and I still hope to be able to release Om2009. This requires bug-
fixing not new features.
I am
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
>> (I understand that Laszlo didn't get the support needed but got some
>> of his code rejected -> lost interest.. )
>
> I would like to add my 2 cents here;)
>
> I didnt stopped workin
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> Thank you very much for your offer, I will compile my list of
> questions, and shoot at you;)
>
> Besides, I would like to talk with you, how can we more collaborate...
No problem. You can sometime find me on freenode IRC as charlie137
(usual
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Guillaume Chereau wrote:
> Beside, even though I stopped working on paroli long before Mirko, I
> still understand how the core works ; contact me by email (or on this
> list) if you have any question about it, I can have a -quick- look at
> it.
Thank you very much
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Laszlo
KREKACS wrote:
> There are many ongoing work, which needs to be integrated into
> paroli. There are two branches by Dietrich, namely tacheles
> and rebase. Where tacheles needs some very deep (tichy/paroli)
> knowledge, to be able to integrate into paroli.
He
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> 3 issues that need solving
>
> "SIM card full" when it's not really full as the messages are stored in the
> rootfs.
Need to look into how to fake incoming sms', because, I dont use sms at all.
>
> Contacts disappearing
Like loosing co
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> (I understand that Laszlo didn't get the support needed but got some
> of his code rejected -> lost interest.. )
I would like to add my 2 cents here;)
I didnt stopped working on paroli at all,
just my attention was distracted by some hobb
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 01:49 +0200 schrieb pike:
> an interesting exception I noticed when
> playing with mdbus - when I interrupt a mdbus
> call with control-c, it throws a python exception
> at me saying (eventually)
DBus in the version that we currently ship is broken wrt. SIGINT
behaviou
Hi,
I meant to say
On Wed, 29.07.2009 at 22:04:16 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm a bit out-of-sync with all of you, due to "other work",
that I'm sorry if there's a bit of duplication, and I also don't
expect a quick fix.
I have one feature request, though:
* Ability to explicitly refuse t
Hi,
On Fri, 24.07.2009 at 08:40:45 +0200, Mirko Lindner
wrote:
> There still is the plan to release a final version of Om2009. It
> would be good if we could assemble a list of problems in paroli that
> need fixing for the release.
I'm a bit out-of-sync with all of you, due
Hi
an interesting exception I noticed when
playing with mdbus - when I interrupt a mdbus
call with control-c, it throws a python exception
at me saying (eventually)
"ImportError: no module named dbus.exceptions"
Now, that sounds .. wrong. It's trying to properly
raise an exception, but it can't
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 14:00, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> Dnia 2009-07-27, pon o godzinie 13:01 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> pisze:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
>> > [cut]
>> >> You should "feel" the air.
>> >> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never
On July 27, 2009 03:04:30 am Adolph J. Vogel wrote:
>
> I must admit this whole thread is starting to worry me. I don`t mean to
> pester but could someone please provide some clarrification on the status
> of Om2009 / Paroli?
>
Om2009 is moving forward very slowly at the mom
Dnia 2009-07-27, pon o godzinie 13:01 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
pisze:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > [cut]
> >> You should "feel" the air.
> >> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
> > [...]
> >> guess why their software crashes on late
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Michal Brzozowski wrote:
> 2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> > Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
> > closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
> >
>
> No it's not bad by design, because some peo
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 13:14, Michal Brzozowski wrote:
> 2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>>
>> Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
>> closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
>
> No it's not bad by design, because some people use other d
2009/7/27 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>
> Packaging apps on your own is bad by design (unless you're packaging
> closed source apps, but they are also bad :P), not changes in SHR.
>
No it's not bad by design, because some people use other distros than SHR,
like Om2008.
Plus if someone publishes a ne
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> [cut]
>> You should "feel" the air.
>> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
> [...]
>> guess why their software crashes on latest shr, rebuild and upload
>> again on opkg.org and so on).
> Well, Sebastian, i have t
[cut]
> You should "feel" the air.
> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
[...]
> guess why their software crashes on latest shr, rebuild and upload
> again on opkg.org and so on).
Well, Sebastian, i have to say Nicola has a point here. I agree.
[cut]
--
Kind Regards
> Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still is
> development on both projects but less than before. Laszlo is doing a
> great job improving things in paroli which I am very thankful for.
> There still is the plan to release a final version of Om2009. It
> would be g
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:40:14AM +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Mirko
> Lindner wrote:
> > Less man power is the right way of putting it. There still is
> > development on both projects but less than before. Laszlo is doing a
> > great job improving things in par
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 17:21, Nicola Mfb wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian
> Krzyszkowiak wrote:
> [...]
>> We just don't want to release crap as "stable". There were problems
>> with either FSO, SHR, build system etc. We wanted to start releasing
>> testing images regular every
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian
Krzyszkowiak wrote:
[...]
> We just don't want to release crap as "stable". There were problems
> with either FSO, SHR, build system etc. We wanted to start releasing
> testing images regular every week... week ago. But there is opkg
> problem, which is p
ular breaking updates and there is no real interesting on
> stabilize it. I do not want to hurt anyone is only my opinion.
>
> With om2009 release plan I just thought: SHR has no man power or will
> to maintain two different branch, the stable and the developing at
> least now, the
On Friday 24 July 2009 23:40:14 Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> I actually tried Zhone the other day (when Paroli or
> FSO failed to delete SMS's from the SIM) and was very pleased with it
> - I'd really like to see it developed further!
I heard that multiple times now, I think the UI really has somethin
ot
of unstable to test fork where done and abandoned. Finally I just
realized that it's a real nice hacking distro with tons of bleeding
edge and regular breaking updates and there is no real interesting on
stabilize it. I do not want to hurt anyone is only my opinion.
With om2009 release plan
it.paroli-project.org/?p=paroli.git;a=summary
-> last changes 12 days ago, the commits before that are from 3 weeks ago..
(I understand that Laszlo didn't get the support needed but got some
of his code rejected -> lost interest.. )
> There still is the plan to release a final version o
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mirko
Lindner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24 Jul 2009, at 02:04, Nicola Mfb wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
>> terminated?
>> Somethings changed in the last days and may be now t
Hi,
On 24 Jul 2009, at 02:04, Nicola Mfb wrote:
> Hi!
> Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
> terminated?
> Somethings changed in the last days and may be now there is less man
> power to improve them.
Less man power is the right way of putting
Hi!
Is om2009 and paroli in a temporary sleeping status or was development
terminated?
Somethings changed in the last days and may be now there is less man
power to improve them.
Regards
Nicola
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community
Most of the time I use only one essid, so I have this script to activate wlan:
mdbus -s org.freesmartphone.ousaged /org/freesmartphone/Usage
org.freesmartphone.Usage.SetResourcePolicy WiFi enabled
iwconfig eth0 essid ESSID_NAME
ifup eth0
-Aapo Rantalainen
On Thursday 23 July 2009, pike wrote:
> Hi
>
> >> Is there a way to request WiFi activation from
> >> FSO straight from the command line ?
> >
> > Yes, if you search the archive you'll find some mdbus or dbus-send
> > examples, or as saied you may use fsoraw.
>
> Sorry, I found none. I'm sure I jus
1 - 100 of 637 matches
Mail list logo
