Re: Ventura Debian package? [Re: ventura upgrades]

2010-04-28 Thread c_c
Hi, Mikael Berthe wrote: > > Do you know if somebody has built a Debian package for Ventura? > It looks like ewebkit is missing as well on Debian. > I don't know. Though I'm willing to help if someone attempts this. I tried making a deb for intone, but it didn't quite work out right. ewebki

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Alishams Hassam
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:11 +0200, Gand' wrote: > really ? > because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't > exceed a day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with > SHR ... > if it's not the #1024, what else ? > -- > Gand' Have you been using wifi? I know for su

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand'
really ? because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't exceed a day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with SHR ... if it's not the #1024, what else ? -- Gand' On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Radek Polak wrote: > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' w

Ventura Debian package? [Re: ventura upgrades]

2010-04-28 Thread Mikael Berthe
Hello, Do you know if somebody has built a Debian package for Ventura? It looks like ewebkit is missing as well on Debian. Regards, Mikael * c_c [2010-04-15 03:31 +0200]: > > I've updated the repository so the newer version should hit the feeds > soon. For those not willing to wait here is

QtMoko wifi certificate selector

2010-04-28 Thread Ben Thompson
Hi I want to set up a Wireless network in QtMoko using WPA-EAP with a server certificate. The encryption settings GUI has a section called "Server certificate:" and there is a small padlock icon. However, when I click the padlock, all I see is the message "No documents found". Can someone advise

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Radek Polak
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' wrote: > The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko > /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* > is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) It's the same if you have "always" or "yes". The code checks for "never" and

Re: QtMoko v22

2010-04-28 Thread Radek Polak
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 09:16:09 Yann SLADEK wrote: > My bad.. > > I follow instructions on french wiki, it tells to modify DeepSleep in > Active=always (as shr in fact) > I modified it in the right way (Active=yes) and I got > Apr 28 09:10:37 neo Qtopia: AtChat : T : "AT%SLEEP=4" >

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Petr Vanek
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:31:30 +0200 "Gand'" (G) wrote: >The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko >/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* >is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) i have already corrected the 1024 page [1] on openmoko wiki if the confusio

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand'
The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) -- Gand' On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Alfa21 wrote: > > another cause maybe: > > [quoting from wiki about debian] > echo 5

Re: QtMoko v22

2010-04-28 Thread Yann SLADEK
My bad.. I follow instructions on french wiki, it tells to modify DeepSleep in Active=always (as shr in fact) I modified it in the right way (Active=yes) and I got Apr 28 09:10:37 neo Qtopia: AtChat : T : "AT%SLEEP=4" So it sounds good, let's wait for an experiment in the real life now

Re: ventura upgrades

2010-04-28 Thread c_c
Hi, Petr Vanek wrote: > > thank you for the updated version, nice to have the ability to hide > the controls, if needed. > Thanks go out to Richard Kralovic-3!! Petr Vanek wrote: > > The "Page" item is hardly usable but i can imagine this is EFL issue > and nt yours... just reporting :), >