Re: [Shr-User] [SHR-T] Images from 29th of May

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:45:37 +0300 Risto H. Kurppa ri...@kurppa.fi wrote: Hi there! The latest SHR-testing images are available at http://build.shr-project.org/tests/shr-testing/images/om-gta02/ Martin Jansa / JaMa prepared them in the end of May but it wasn't announced anywhere - so

Re: [Shr-User] [SHR-T] Images from 29th of May

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:14:16AM +0200, omcomali@porcupinefactory.org wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:45:37 +0300 Risto H. Kurppa ri...@kurppa.fi wrote: Hi there! The latest SHR-testing images are available at http://build.shr-project.org/tests/shr-testing/images/om-gta02/

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu: Hi, list. Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :) Being a FR user since the beginning, it's really amazing to see how it improved since 2007.2 and 2008.x/2009.x distros, in usability, prettiness and speed (specially due

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010/7/17 Gennady Kupava g...@bsdmn.com: Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :) A great way to rant :) The glamo timing fix seems to work great here so far. Regarding the older thread, I finally tested also it with the 500/83 CPU/memclock setting (533/88 hanged during boot when most of

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:42:19 +0400 Gennady Kupava g...@bsdmn.com (GK) wrote: 1.6. --- How to test/use it I used this settings by default for several days with qtmokoV24 and with debian on usd. I prepared u-boot to set new timings by default:

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu: Hi, list. Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :) You should get for new timings: Old value: addr[4808]=0x80 0x13 0x00 0x00 Expecting some reports from users, did it work for you flawlessly? r...@om-gta02

Glamo bus speed, testing of GLAMO_REG_LCD_A_BASE2 FIFO settings.

Hi list. I decided to do and share some additional tests related to glamo bus speed. This tests related to change found by Thomas White early this year to GLAMO_REG_LCD_A_BASE2 which change some kind of fifo. Goal of this test is to find out how this change influence glamo speed and how

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

O Domingo, 18 de Xullo de 2010 18:17:07 David Garabana Barro escribiu: O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu: I'm currently using shr-u, will report any problem... I had a WSOD shutting down, but not yet during normal use. As with new kernel WSOD are back again (at

Re: Glamo bus speed, testing of GLAMO_REG_LCD_A_BASE2 FIFO settings.

O Domingo, 18 de Xullo de 2010 18:52:39 Gennady Kupava escribiu: Hi list. First i did tests with different FIFO settings and 2-4-2 timings, and go absolutely same results in each tests. So here is only test results for FIFO = 0 or FIFO = 1 (0x4000): FIFO 0 1 2-4-2, 10Mb/s

Glamo bus speed, testing of GLAMO_REG_LCD_A_BASE2 FIFO settings

David, According to your previous mail (Glamo slowness question...) it seems it is 1, am I right? Sure, by default we have 4-4-4 fifo 1 since beginning of 2010, this is just testing which may be interesting to whoose who wonder about FIFO depths. Gennady.

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

Wow, you're doing an awesome job here!! I've tried it on my QtMoko V24 running from NAND and it works great, the interface is noticeably faster and so is a more intensive program like Navit. Everything seems to work as it should, suspending and resuming is fine. As Timo Jyrinki already

Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu: Hi, list. Expecting some reports from users, did it work for you flawlessly? One small problem I found When you get a WSOD (rotating screen), if you just reboot, you obtain a WSOD on every following reboot You MUST halt device

Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video softdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

When you get a WSOD (rotating screen) Fixes exist to fix this (for both xrandr rotation, resolution switch and screen blanking), this not related to timings. When you get a WSOD (rotating screen), if you just reboot, you obtain a WSOD on every following reboot. You MUST halt device for getting

[shr-u] u-boot settings problem?

Could somebody please update the: NOR-flash booter u-boot - that also works with a bootkernel bigger that 2MB? Instead of this: # From: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Kernel#.22Verifying_Checksum_..._Bad_Data_CRC.22_with_U-boot setenv bootcmd setenv bootargs \${bootargs_base} \${mtdparts}\;

Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

One more thing, if cpu load look like too high for some exprienced mplayer users, this may be caused by my mplayer version - it is built with -fno-omit-frame-pointer and with run in parallel with _callgraph_ profiling, which seem adds some additional cpu load. For pure timings, here is cpu load