Marco Miani wrote:
hi everybody
after lurking from the beginning of this list I have a question :
Will we have total control over the GSM module?
from what i recall the firmware will interact with the GSM part as if it
was a modem or something like that. yep, that means those classical AT
com
hi everybody
after lurking from the beginning of this list I have a question :
Will we have total control over the GSM module?
I recently bought a Motorola Motofone F3 and my carrier ( Vodafone Italy
) called me for a firmware upgrade because the cellphone sends
periodically an sms to a UK numbe
On 4/28/07, Igor Foox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27-Apr-07, at 5:09 PM, Duncan Hudson wrote:
>> 2) the iPhone may slip too.
>>
>> Its all the rumor in the Apple world these days. We already know
>> that Apple has slipped its next OS release (10.5) because it put
>> some large number of its
On 4/27/07, Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Duncan Hudson wrote:
> Jim Thompson wrote:
>> 4) Relax... you're not going to be able to add features to an iPhone.
> OSX is unix based, so you and I both know that one will be able to add
> apps to the iPhone. We also both know that for it to
Igor Foox wrote:
On 27-Apr-07, at 5:09 PM, Duncan Hudson wrote:
I think it's wrong to assume that every customer that FIC loses with the
Neo will go to the iPhone. First of all the iPhone's price point is
quite high when compared to the Neo, and will be out of reach for many.
Also see my poi
On 4/27/07, Igor Foox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know what FIC's plans are for selling the phone through
mobile providers in the future, but having 'average joe' buy the
handset from FIC directly is _the_ major barier to wider distribution
in my opinion. At least in North America, not ma
On 27-Apr-07, at 5:09 PM, Duncan Hudson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
1) the Openmoko-for-customers is slated for 9/11/07, so it was
going to ship after the "Q207" date for the iPhone in any case.
It was supposed to be in developers & enthusiasts hands back in
February - was it not? The plan
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
4) Relax... you're not going to be able to add features to an iPhone.
OSX is unix based, so you and I both know that one will be able to add
apps to the iPhone. We also both know that for it to succeed in the
business environment they'll have to allo
Apple has said they won't allow any third party apps they don't
approve. That most likely means no apps Cingular doesn't approve
also. You think Cingular is going to allow VOIP apps that reduce the
money Cingular makes off the phone? You think I'll be able to get my
little MythTV remote app app
Jim Thompson wrote:
1) the Openmoko-for-customers is slated for 9/11/07, so it was going
to ship after the "Q207" date for the iPhone in any case.
It was supposed to be in developers & enthusiasts hands back in February
- was it not? The plan was to get the geek on board, get them writing
apps
Ian Stirling wrote:
As it is, it sounds like the first preorders (if that's still going to
be done) are going to be delivered sometime May 20, if the screen
problems are resolved.
Leaving a couple of months dev time at best before there is something
to show to carriers or phone shop chains if t
Hi.
I found this post, which may be of interest (in regard to hypothetical
widgets and webUI)
http://zecke.blogspot.com/2006/12/webkit-for-olpcs-sugar.html
Another interesting project:
Screenlets: OSX-like widgets
http://hendrik.kaju.pri.ee/screenlets/
Cheers
Florent
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
