On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:19:34 Paul A. Lambert wrote:
> compatible this group is at least in philosophy. The
> participation is closed, the forum allows patented code (as long as
> the license is non-discriminatory). Even with these issues, I'd
> still be very interested in seeing what th
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is useful. It sounds a bit more like a
marketing group.
You have to pay a fee to join.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dean Collins wrote:
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard
and work
with it f
On Monday 11 June 2007 19:00:42 Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> I totally agree with your points. Please keep in mind that this was
> our first design. And that we are using an ID design that simply
> wasn't made for what this project has become. It was originally
> designed for a completely different us
I'm not sure if this is useful. It sounds a bit more like a marketing group.
You have to pay a fee to join.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dean Collins wrote:
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard and work
with it from inside rather than throwing rocks from the outside.
C
Interesting... Web services... I wonder if that makes it possible to
export the web service off the phone
To a program running somewhere else... Or if its limited to some local
channel.
And, anyway.. That only means you would have to wrap it in another,
fully exportable, web service for such i
Wow. once again Apple justifies our lead.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:54 PM, adrian cockcroft wrote:
Also, Apple's announcement today about iPhone development using
AJAX and exposing internal phone functions as web services to the
iPhone's safari browser is tipping everything in the same direction
Tim Newsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
> impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
> closed' whatever that means.
It just struck me that the phone book contact info is pretty close to
what one wants f
Also, Apple's announcement today about iPhone development using AJAX and
exposing internal phone functions as web services to the iPhone's safari
browser is tipping everything in the same direction.
Cheers Adrian
On 6/11/07, Matthew S. Hamrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah... we're thinking
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:19 -0500, Tim Shannon wrote:
> I know that there are going to be themes for the OpenMoko interface,
> but I'm just wondering if there is anyone who has started working on
> alternate themes? I think I'd like to take a crack at it, and I was
> curious if anyone has had any
I know that there are going to be themes for the OpenMoko interface, but I'm
just wondering if there is anyone who has started working on alternate
themes? I think I'd like to take a crack at it, and I was curious if anyone
has had any start yet.
___
Op
From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
'closed' whatever that means.
If we are going to back a group, maybe FIC should join it and help in
the development process of the standard. None of the memb
Long overdue and if it is a standard then lets all jump onboard and work
with it from inside rather than throwing rocks from the outside.
Cheers,
Dean
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Paulson
> Sent
the register has a piece about a draft of a standard API for linux
phones, concerning basics such as interaction with the address book,
texting, ui and voice-calling. future revisons to increase the
coverage
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/11/lips_mobile_linux/
and from TFA
http://www.lips
2007/6/11, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Believe me when I say that we are working on new stuff that will
address these issues. I have been quiet for the past few months
because of some major internal re-allocations and new events. Within
about a month we should be more or less finished a
Krzysztof Kajkowski schrieb:
> 2007/6/11, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Believe me when I say that we are working on new stuff that will
>> address these issues. I have been quiet for the past few months
>> because of some major internal re-allocations and new events. Within
>> about a
Not unless the Neo has a camera. Don't forget that the Wii remote has one.
-Steven
On 6/11/07, kenneth marken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Florent THIERY wrote:
>
> In other terms: we could potentially use any Wiimote accessory on a
> Neo... A nunchunk has a 3 axis accelerometer, joystick and b
2007/6/11, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Believe me when I say that we are working on new stuff that will
address these issues. I have been quiet for the past few months
because of some major internal re-allocations and new events. Within
about a month we should be more or less finished a
Sean Moss-Pultz writes:
>
>On Jun 11, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Miguel A. Torres wrote:
>>
>> * Integrated keyboard and directional pads are not mere luxuries,
>> but necessities. They allow for safe one hand operation while
>> reducing touchscreen stress. Touchscreens are fragile (get
>> scratched e
[I'm CC'ing the community list because there's lots of points here
that go well beyond hardware.]
On Jun 11, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Miguel A. Torres wrote:
Hi,
Like many of you, I'm following the project with great enthusiasm.
This will surely demonstrate companies in the sector that open
sou
Yeah... we're thinking that we were going to totally separate the
model and domain processing from the view/controller part of the
application. That way we could have a couple different HTML
interfaces as well as a SVG/ECMAScript interface. I'm not terribly
familiar with XAML or XUL, but I
If we are heading in the direction of web interfaces, I think we should
look at XAML or XUL or something similar. From what I can tell, they
will be adding silverlight support to mono, so using XAML will be
possible. This also separates the code for functionality from the
interface and can al
Florent...
This is something we've been working on at the homebrew mobile phone
club for a while. Our project is called Jowles and is focused on
creating an application architecture that provides both XML and DBUS
interfaces to system services. One of our very old demos can be seen
at htt
Hey everyone! Saw this page on digg today about 5 cool linux phones. The
Neo1973 is one of them and there is a great video to go along with it.
Check it out!
http://digg.com/linux_unix/5_Cool_Linux_Powered_Phones
(and digg all the comments that say good things about openmoko ;)
_
Here's a little look-and-feel example that could be done with an
opensource AJAX framework [javascript required]:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/showcase
This may allow easier separation between apps and GUIs. Of course, as
usual we have no idea how well such an app would perform (little &
grat
Florent THIERY wrote:
In other terms: we could potentially use any Wiimote accessory on a
Neo... A nunchunk has a 3 axis accelerometer, joystick and buttons,
for instance (for a mere 20$). What are the upcoming wii accessories?
:)
or how about going the other way, using the upcoming neo varia
I guess if what you really want is the joystick
... Or any upcoming Wii accessories (who knows what will come from
these prolific brains ^^ ?); i guess a text input accessory will have
to come sooner or later. Yet, as you pointed out, here i'm interested
by the joystick + buttons
you'd want th
The Wii remotes use standard bluetooth. See
http://www.wiili.org/index.php/Wiimote_driver for some info on connecting to
a Linux box. If you a have better source, please share.
So, if you're just looking for the accelerometer, there's no need to splice
wires. Plus, the GTA02 will have two 3D a
Following the "there's much more than GFX effects in a usable UI", here's an
interesting blog post:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000883.html
It's not about embedded devices GUI, rather about desktop apps vs. web apps.
However, mutatis mutandis, it drives another nail in the same cof
On Sunday 10 June 2007 22:50, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> And IMHO there is only a very weak relation between a processor's
> instruction set and its power consumption.
Not direct, but several strong points can arise from using a specific
instruction set (presuming compatibility is one of t
From:
http://www.windmeadow.com/node/42
"Data can be read from a wii nunchuck directly into an Arduino, using
TWI (aka I2C). "
In other terms: we could potentially use any Wiimote accessory on a
Neo... A nunchunk has a 3 axis accelerometer, joystick and buttons,
for instance (for a mere 20$). W
30 matches
Mail list logo
