Hi everybody,
Can anyone tell me what the differences will be between GTA02v1 and GTA02v2?
And if GTA02v1 will be on sale for developers?
I am planning on buying 2 Neos, one for me and one for my girlfriend.
If GTA02v1 will turn out to be a usable device I could buy a GTA02v1
for development and l
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 17:52:44 Ian Stirling wrote:
> So 'true GPL' systems should discourage users installing commercial
> software?
Closed source (proprietary) software, yes. Note that OSS _can_ be commercial,
and I don't have a problem with that. OSS is ok and proprietary software is
OK,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> IMHO, Your response here to Joe was uncalled for and frankly, rude.
>
I said much the same to this person, off-list, and got an equally
churlish response. I see a spam filter coming with his email address on
it...
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO, Your response here to Joe was uncalled for and frankly, rude.
I also resent the implication that I and others are "disgruntled whiners".
While gentleman may agree or disagree, there is little to no call for this
kind response to such a minor observation or suggestion.
My
I think that this feature must work in close conjunction with
'auto power on' feature mentioned earlier. It will be transparent for
user, provide him quiet night and save battery power...
Wednesday, August 29, 2007, 8:42:55 PM, you wrote:
> Quoting Denis Parchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> How abo
Quoting Denis Parchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How about turning itself on at a particular time, for an alarm
clock feature?
And how about turning itself off, for example for the night =)
Well, (judging by the marketing materials) if we're going to be able
to tell the phone to turn off its
> How about turning itself on at a particular time, for an alarm clock feature?
And how about turning itself off, for example for the night =)
=#=-===-===#=--- - -- -=#=-- - - - -
Best regards,
Denis
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 8/29/07, Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It can do 'switch off on low battery', and be 'off' for several
weeks-months, while being able to respond rapidly to charger being
plugged in, and charge at high rate - but this again is unimplemented.
How about turnin
On 8/29/07, Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It can do 'switch off on low battery', and be 'off' for several
> weeks-months, while being able to respond rapidly to charger being
> plugged in, and charge at high rate - but this again is unimplemented.
How about turning itself on at a parti
On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not interested to disect the argument around axis of symmetry to help
> you prove your childish argument.
> If you are one of the disgruntled whiners about the Neo, then unsubscribe.
It appear the tongue-in-cheek humour was lost o
Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2007 15:15:11 Krzysztof Kajkowski wrote:
I wonder that this could be serioul hickup after going public... I can
already see all those frustrated users who left their phones for night
and in the morning they cannot make important phone call. And they
ha
Attila Csipa wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2007 17:24, Giles Jones wrote:
It means a heck of a lot if you can't earn back the outlay. Mobile
If you _can_ earn it back directly through selling proprietary software for
it, OpenMoko is a mockery of the GPL. In that case you are not creating a
tr
I am not interested to disect the argument around axis of symmetry to
help you prove your childish argument.
If you are one of the disgruntled whiners about the Neo, then
unsubscribe.
Joe Friedrichsen wrote:
On 8/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Read the post
Hi.
I've been following this project for a couple years with great
interest but I have a few questions (for those with gen1 and just
those with some knowledge of the possibilities/limitations of the
hardware)
How hardy is the unit? I realize it has no moving parts but could it
take repeated jarri
This would serve as a great project map as well, since each feature
would point to a feature-dedicated page (where appropriate).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Wood
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:15 AM
To: List for OpenMoko comm
On 15:35:39 2007-08-29 "Jeremy G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "The "free and open Anti-iPhone" rhetoric surrounding the FIC phone is
> therefore marketing drivel to sell a Chinese Windows Mobile device as
> a hobbyist kit for phone hackers."
>
> Statements like that really piss me off. For one,
"The "free and open Anti-iPhone" rhetoric surrounding the FIC phone is
therefore marketing drivel to sell a Chinese Windows Mobile device as
a hobbyist kit for phone hackers."
Statements like that really piss me off. For one, AFAIK nobody within
FIC is trying to introduce the Neo as an "Anti-iPho
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 22:01 -0400, Jacques Poulin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a page somewhere that gives the status of the different features
> usually found on a phone for the Openmoko project ?
Sounds like an excellent idea! Would you like to volunteer to create the
page in the wiki? We can t
So - does anyone know anything about shipping GTA02 phase-1 devices?
Will they be marked as "developer-equipment" and maybe also sold with a
"special price" like the GTA01 devices?
- Original Message -
From: "mokoNinja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "List for OpenMoko community discussion"
Sen
On 8/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Read the post before you jump to conclusions.
> The suggestion was to make at least the bottom square.
I did:
On 8/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer the aesthetic look of the Neo and there is nothing more
awesome pics!
cheers!
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:40:19 +0800, mokoNinja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Marco Barreno wrote:
>
>> Right--the phase is tied to the progress of the software and the
>> readiness of the phone. The same three phases will apply to future
>> de
On 29/08/2007, Richard Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heh! It's an Apple fan site, so you can't expect any attempt at
> objectivity - as the forum following up the article shows:
>
>
> http://roughlydrafted.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=290&page=1#Item_0
>
> Given that Apple fans alrea
On Aug 28, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Marco Barreno wrote:
Right--the phase is tied to the progress of the software and the
readiness of the phone. The same three phases will apply to future
devices. GTA01 vs. GTA02 is an issue of hardware platform: GTA01 is a
certain set of hardware components, and G
23 matches
Mail list logo
