Sudharshan S wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:47 +0800, 孙廉焘 wrote:
>> Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme!
>>
>> I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now!
>>
> I think this has been fixed from r3304.
> http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/commitlog/2007-October/002946.ht
The modem licensing is a big deal breaker for me. I purchased a
quad-band phone because I live in the US and need 850 coverage. I
knew it is developer preview beta phone, and was willing to contribute
and wait until the software is ready.
If the phone is not going to be licensed for all four ban
I suggest using the signing tool ().
--sagacis
On 10/31/07, John Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, October 31, 2007 8:18 pm, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> > I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide
> > a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first legal issue was to allow for the distribution of the driver in
binary-only form. That was resolved.
The next issue was technical, and resulted from the switch from OABI to
EABI. That issue has a number of w
John Morrison wrote:
One thing that I would like to suggest is that any time you reference a
relative date you qualify it with the date you added the comment to the
wiki.
Good point. Done.
Michael
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@li
Michael Shiloh wrote:
The next issue was technical, and resulted from the switch from OABI to
EABI. That issue has a number of workarounds (wrapper, chroot), but
unfortunately all these technical solutions raise another set of legal
issues.
I personally would be satisfied with the original "
On Wed, October 31, 2007 8:18 pm, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide
> a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like to see addressed.
> I've also created a page for each previous Community Update, for
> reference.
>
> http://wik
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first legal issue was to allow for the distribution of the driver in
> binary-only form. That was resolved.
>
> The next issue was technical, and resulted from the switch from OABI to
> EABI. That issue has a number of workarounds (wrappe
I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide
a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like to see addressed.
I've also created a page for each previous Community Update, for reference.
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Community_Updates
I'd like to consolidate a
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this
up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on.
I thought the legal issue was resolved.
Sorry for the confusion. I went bac
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:01:30 -0500, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current neo1973 is not FCC approved to operate in the 850Mhz band.
> It would be illegal for FIC to sell the device in the US with it
> activated. BT and PCS is the only approved band currently.
>
> http://www.phonescoop.
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this
> up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on.
I thought the legal issue was resolved.
___
OpenMoko comm
Mike Montour wrote:
Michael Shiloh wrote:
To save time, please refrain from re-opening previous discussions.
"Re-opening" implies that there has been some previous closure, vs. a
discussion that just trailed off into silence. Could you please provide
regular updates on important items tha
Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this
up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on.
Michael
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 10/31/07, Mike Montour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Delivery of the promised 'gllin' GPS binary to GTA01 owners
(anything
Adam wrote:
Sorry if this has been posted before.
FCC:
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUN&pc=HXD8V2
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/HXD8
It is called "Dash Express." http://dash.net/ instead of dash.org
"NameDash Express
Screen 4.3" 480x320 WQVGA
Flash3 GB
CPU
I hope their awesome fresh software will run on our Neo1973s, too. I'd
gladly pay money for that stuff. :) Would be great if they could keep the
data open, though. Anyone from Dash around who can comment a little more on
what is planned?
Ortwin
On 10/31/07, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 10/31/07, Mike Montour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Delivery of the promised 'gllin' GPS binary to GTA01 owners
> (anything that can be made to work, OABI/EABI/chrooted/whatever)
Yes. Again, it has been much, much, much too long that we have been
waiting for this.
... I'm assuming that it runs or will run
Openmoko.
Tim O'Reilly said so too:
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/10/dash_web2summit_openmoko.html
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman
Sorry if this has been posted before.
FCC:
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUN&pc=HXD8V2
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/HXD8
It is called "Dash Express." http://dash.net/ instead of dash.org
"NameDash Express
Screen 4.3" 480x320 WQVGA
Flash3 GB
CPU Samsung s3c24
The current neo1973 is not FCC approved to operate in the 850Mhz band.
It would be illegal for FIC to sell the device in the US with it
activated. BT and PCS is the only approved band currently.
http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUN&pc=GTA01BV4
Mike Montour wrote:
Michael Sh
Michael Shiloh wrote:
To save time, please refrain from re-opening previous discussions.
"Re-opening" implies that there has been some previous closure, vs. a
discussion that just trailed off into silence. Could you please provide
regular updates on important items that are still open, even
Hello,
I apologize that my bi-weekly update is a little late for this period.
This is mostly due to traveling on my part.
The update today is more organizational than technical.
OpenMoko has added some key positions and some key people in those
positions. This should help move the project fo
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:47 +0800, 孙廉焘 wrote:
> Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme!
>
> I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now!
>
> What I have done is:
> 1. modified kernel_wildcard variable in the openmoko/env file,
> replacing '-neo1973' with '-fic-gta01';
> 2. ru
Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme!
I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now!
What I have done is:
1. modified kernel_wildcard variable in the openmoko/env file, replacing
'-neo1973' with '-fic-gta01';
2. run openmoko/download.sh, and the uImage-2.6.21.5-r3-fic-gta01.bin
孙廉焘 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu.
>
> I have done these steps:
> sudo apt-get install netpbm lynx
> svn checkout https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/qemu-neo1973
> cd qemu-neo1973
> ./configur
孙廉焘 wrote:
> I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu.
>
> openmoko/download.sh
> openmoko/flash.sh
>
> After openmoko/flash.sh, the output information is listed briefly as
> following(full version is an attachment):
>
> ls: /roo
Hi all,
I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu.
I have done these steps:
sudo apt-get install netpbm lynx
svn checkout https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/qemu-neo1973
cd qemu-neo1973
./configure --target-list=arm-softmmu --c
27 matches
Mail list logo