On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:49:25AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> An application should be able to wake up the phone from suspend (or
> rather add an entry to the `at` queue saying "wake me at this time") and
> it should be able to fire up a GPRS connection. How long will it take to
> check for new m
On 1 Sep 2008, at 21:27, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> ...
> I just realised why my drop-call solution is so much superior to any
> IMAP-idle or interval checking. It's funny no one thought about this
> yet.
>
> When using IMAP-idle you can hardly suspend, can you? At least it
> would
> be necessary to
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:27:27PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 31 Aug 2008, at 12:46, Ole Kliemann wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:37:05AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> >> As the son of Lancastrian blood, I can sympathise with
> >> parsimoniousness, but right now Ole's suggestion appears pen
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:27:27PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 31 Aug 2008, at 12:46, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> > Are you by any chance associated with a VoIP company and afraid of
> > people making no-connect/no-cost calls all the time? ;-)
>
> No, not at all.
>
> But I figured that since you're
On 31 Aug 2008, at 11:56, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
>> On 30 Aug 2008, at 05:34, Rod Whitby wrote:
>>> Please don't assume that everyone has unlimited data plans.
>>
>> "Please don't assume" probably won't prevent developers from doing
>> so.
>
> Nothing can prevent open source develop
On 31 Aug 2008, at 12:46, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:37:05AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>> As the son of Lancastrian blood, I can sympathise with
>> parsimoniousness, but right now Ole's suggestion appears penny-
>> pinching to me, rather than practical & prudent economising.
>
Stroller wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2008, at 05:34, Rod Whitby wrote:
>> Please don't assume that everyone has unlimited data plans.
>
> "Please don't assume" probably won't prevent developers from doing so.
Nothing can prevent open source developers from taking any world view
they please. That's their
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:30:23PM +, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> With my prepaid I have to pay traffic for every 10kb at 24ct/mb.
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:44:31AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > I meant to ask in my previous email:
> > Anyone know what is the overhead of IMAP-idle?
>
> Probably v
With my prepaid I have to pay traffic for every 10kb at 24ct/mb.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:44:31AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> I meant to ask in my previous email:
> Anyone know what is the overhead of IMAP-idle?
Probably very low as long as the connection is stable. Every reconnect
due to connecti
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ole Kliemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:37:05AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>> As the son of Lancastrian blood, I can sympathise with
>> parsimoniousness, but right now Ole's suggestion appears penny-
>> pinching to me, rather than practical
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 06:37:05AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> As the son of Lancastrian blood, I can sympathise with
> parsimoniousness, but right now Ole's suggestion appears penny-
> pinching to me, rather than practical & prudent economising.
Are you by any chance associated with a VoIP comp
On 30 Aug 2008, at 11:52, Ole Kliemann wrote:
>> ...
>> I expect the IMAP client on my openmoko phone to be able to
>> download all
>> my email for offline reading, deleting, and replying on the bus with
>> *no* internet connectivity, and then sync all those changes
>> seamlessly
>> to the ser
On 30 Aug 2008, at 05:34, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
>> I thought the "standard" now was unlimited data plans.
> ...
>> You have my sympathies if you're not on an unlimited data plan, Ole,
>> but I would see unlimited data use as the long-term expectation of
>> OpenMoko projects.
>
> Ple
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 02:04:37PM +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
> > I thought the "standard" now was unlimited data plans.
> ...
> > You have my sympathies if you're not on an unlimited data plan, Ole,
> > but I would see unlimited data use as the long-term expectation of
> > Open
Stroller wrote:
> I thought the "standard" now was unlimited data plans.
...
> You have my sympathies if you're not on an unlimited data plan, Ole,
> but I would see unlimited data use as the long-term expectation of
> OpenMoko projects.
Please don't assume that everyone has unlimited data pla
On 28 Aug 2008, at 18:03, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> ...
> If you have some friends who are willing to use a system like that,
> then
> message can be passed with notification within this group for a
> very low
> price. I pay 24euro-ct/MB and only for every started 10kb. On the
> other
> hand the
On 2008.08.28.17.03, Ole Kliemann wrote:
| I think it depends on the amount of mail and what you want to do. I
| thought of it as a kind of MMS replacement. The ability to send larger
| messages with possible multimedia content and having immediate
| notification.
Another idea is to do the same t
Good points.
I very rarely take an interest in my voicemail (despite berating
people for not using it more) and yes, an IMAP solution may incur
extra cost. VM as MMS is an interesting idea; I look forward to seeing
how it pans out!
Joseph
2008/8/28 Ole Kliemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, A
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 03:29:32PM +0100, Joseph Reeves wrote:
> 2008/8/28 Ole Kliemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have VoIP for telephony at home and asterisk running on my server. A
> > script on the server checks my email. If it finds new mail it calls the
> > FR. The FR does not accept the conn
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:17:56PM +0200, Linus Gasser wrote:
> Ole Kliemann a écrit :
> > What I was planning to do:
> > I have VoIP for telephony at home and asterisk running on my server. A
> > script on the server checks my email. If it finds new mail it calls the
> > FR. The FR does not accept
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:17 +0200, Linus Gasser wrote:
> Ole Kliemann a écrit :
> > What I was planning to do:
> > I have VoIP for telephony at home and asterisk running on my server. A
> > script on the server checks my email. If it finds new mail it calls the
> > FR. The FR does not accept the co
We have a Asterisk/FreePBX combination at work. My account is setup to
email me any voicemails I receive as wav files. I can't help but think
that an IMAP client on the phone would be an easier solution to the
one you've proposed.
Joseph
2008/8/28 Ole Kliemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug
Ole Kliemann a écrit :
> What I was planning to do:
> I have VoIP for telephony at home and asterisk running on my server. A
> script on the server checks my email. If it finds new mail it calls the
> FR. The FR does not accept the connection, instead it connects to the
> internet and gets the emai
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:20:38PM -0700, Michael Shiloh wrote:
>
>
> Ole Kliemann wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I'd like to have a file where I put in
> >
> > phonenumber /path/to/shellscript
> >
> > Everytime an incoming call matches one of the numbers in this file,
> > the device
24 matches
Mail list logo
