-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Is it possible to turn off these LEDs via Software?
Yes, they're all controlled from the CPU and default to being off.
- -Andy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
Does this mean that they won't draw any power when they're turned off?
2008/4/29 Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Is it possible to turn off these LEDs via Software?
Yes, they're all controlled from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | Is it possible to turn off these LEDs via Software?
| Yes, they're all controlled from the CPU and default to being off.
| Does this mean that they won't draw any power when they're turned off?
How complicated would surgery to fix this be? Is it reasonable to
create a wiki page detailing hw fix?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Green
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 8:56 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| How complicated would surgery to fix this be? Is it reasonable to
| create a wiki page detailing hw fix?
Well, both transistors are accessible without popping a can, but a) they
are tiny and fiddly, and
Steve kindly emailed me on this issue and said:
The A5 boards have been reworked to remove the [LED] issue. So WRT
LEDs a5 and a6 have the same power consumption.
Therefore you wouldn't need to dig out your soldering iron. Does
anyone know the other differences with power consumption are between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Steve kindly emailed me on this issue and said:
|
| The A5 boards have been reworked to remove the [LED] issue. So WRT
| LEDs a5 and a6 have the same power consumption.
Oh well, problem gone then :-)
-
Yay! That ends the turmoil going on in my mind between my impatience and
my crippling desire to have the best of everything!
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 15:41 +0100, Tim Coggins wrote:
Steve kindly emailed me on this issue and said:
The A5 boards have been reworked to remove the [LED] issue. So WRT
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Tim Coggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve kindly emailed me on this issue and said:
The A5 boards have been reworked to remove the [LED] issue. So WRT
LEDs a5 and a6 have the same power consumption.
The transistors were replaced with the internal-resistor
Is it possible to turn off these LEDs via Software?
Sebastian
Gerald A wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why shipping semi-bugged hardware if there's a fixed version ready?
Any software or hardware
Andrea Debortoli wrote:
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I will too, but only because I can't wait longer :(
I'm not so happy about this decision, btw...
--
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/
2008/4/19, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrea Debortoli wrote:
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I will too, but only because I can't wait longer :(
I'm not so happy about this decision, btw...
It's a
Hello Michael Shiloh,
can you please clear this?
* Marco Trevisan (Treviño) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-04-08 17:45]:
I'm re-posting here some mails from the openmoko-devel Future Button
and LED software spec thread [1] in which there are some infos about
Freerunner hardware that I think they
On Saturday 19 April 2008, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
Andrea Debortoli wrote:
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I will too, but only because I can't wait longer :(
I'm not so happy about this decision, btw...
I say
Andy Green ha scritto:
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I'm re-posting here some mails from the openmoko-devel Future Button
and LED software spec thread [1] in which there are some infos about
Freerunner hardware that I think they should be more visible.
Summarizing, they say that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| I'm re-posting here some mails from the openmoko-devel Future Button
| and LED software spec thread [1] in which there are some infos about
| Freerunner hardware that I think they should be more visible.
|
On 4/18/08, Andy Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| I'm re-posting here some mails from the openmoko-devel Future Button
| and LED software spec thread [1] in which there are some infos about
|
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I think this is a counterproductive way to go on marketingbecause
I apprehend
that nobody will tell us when GTA02v5 will be sold out and GTA02v6 will be
on sale...
just my 2 cents
2008/4/18,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Andrea Debortoli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I will. I also will learn a bit of electronics to fix it. (Since for
me it's fun to learn new things... Ant i also
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds to me as the problem is easy for those of us that knows a little
electronics. If I get one that leaks current, I will start soldering!
Does anybody know if the fix Werner is talking about, will be
On 4/18/08, Ilja O. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Andrea Debortoli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nobody will buy a GTA02v5 knowing that a better revision will be
available some days after...
I will, because I do not want to wait any longer, and I really
On 4/18/08, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds to me as the problem is easy for those of us that knows a
little
electronics. If I get one that leaks current, I will start soldering!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So why shipping semi-bugged hardware if there's a fixed version ready?
Any software or hardware has annoyances or bugs, or missing features. The
question is are they show stoppers, or just mere annoyances? If
23 matches
Mail list logo
