Mike Hodson wrote:
> Why not reply to all? Because im rather sure I don't want to reply to
> the author twice
Well, I want you to reply to me twice, reason being that one copy goes
into my "openmoko" folder and the other goes into my "inbox". This way,
I know this is not just another boring email i
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:29:33PM -0400, hank williams wrote:
> [...]
> A "bad idea" that most other high volume mailing lists do.
> [...]
> A "bad idea" that most other high volume mailing lists do.
> [...]
50 billions of flies eat shit, they can't be wrong...
The majority doesn't always now th
d overand over.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dean
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank
> williams Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2007 10:22 PM
> To:
PM
To: Rod Whitby
Cc: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
Do the people suggesting these changes
think that they really know better about how this list should be
set up?
Yup.
___
OpenMoko community mailing
Hi,
This is getting out of control. I thought more people would have already
been through enough of these discussions so they'd know the facts and
good choices.
I know, it's a bitch that your favourite email client does not support
all the good things in life (like reply to list). But there
> Until my mail client gives me a "reply to list ONLY" command, I vote
> for changing reply-to to BE THE LIST.
My email client has a "reply to list". I use KMail.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org
Mike Hodson wrote:
> Why not reply to all? Because im rather sure I don't want to reply to
> the author twice (as he apparently is on the list) and I don't want to
> reply to anyone else the author sent the mail to. There appears to be
> no other way to use this client than simply 1 or all, not si
Look I'll vote for not changing the subject line; headers are
wonderful for sorting.
However, when I wish to reply -to the list-, I get a choice of either
-to the sender- or -to the list, sender AND anyone else the bloody
sender sent it to- instead of simply replying -to the list-.
While the wond
> Do the people suggesting these changes
> think that they really know better about how this list should be set up?
Yup.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Jim McDonald wrote:
> Just so that the 'silent majority' don't lose out on this one, I would
> like to point out that there are approximately 1,500 people subscribed
> to this list. Can we assume that unless we hear from them their vote is
> 'no change'? There are pros and cons to each system, bu
ou to accurately filter your incoming mail:
> Thread-Topic: Fwd: mailing list management
> X-BeenThere: community@lists.openmoko.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.op
nged to reply to the list instead. I
read the page that was linked, suggesting that's a bad idea, and I
disagree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:26 PM
To: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2007 4:26 PM
> To: OpenMoko
> Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
>
> so I suggest we lea
hank williams wrote:
Oops. As usual I hit "reply to" and it went to casey personally
Its broken.
Just so that the 'silent majority' don't lose out on this one, I would
like to point out that there are approximately 1,500 people subscribed
to this list. Can we assume that unless we hear from t
Oops. As usual I hit "reply to" and it went to casey personally
Its broken.
-- Forwarded message --
From: hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 14, 2007 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: mailing list management
To: Casey Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Munging the subject line is a bad
15 matches
Mail list logo
