Michele Manzato wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I can guess (some of) the reasons behind the plain
words. But then I wonder whether there is really any transparency in the
development of Neo/OpenMoko?
I can sympathize with you to an extent. I fully support the concept
and goal of OpenMoko. If I didn
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Milan Votava writes:
You are all going to become slaves of capitalists (Sean on behalf of FIC).
Better to support guys from xda-developers.com (like cr2) to make
machines like HTC Universal a real free phones
Better to work on a machine in spite of the manufacturer ra
Milan Votava writes:
>
>1/ 99% of this thread is about an unrealistic things to be
>implemented on a non existent (underpowered) device. Who in the World
>cares about things being discussed in this thread? People wants to
>use their pones, to make calls, send sms/mms/emails. I'm being tired
>to
Milan Votava writes:
>You are all going to become slaves of capitalists (Sean on behalf of FIC).
>
>Better to support guys from xda-developers.com (like cr2) to make
>machines like HTC Universal a real free phones
Better to work on a machine in spite of the manufacturer rather than
with the m
On 6/13/07, Milan Votava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(sorry for my english)
I'm subscribed for this this thread for about 6m now. I don't want to
be rude but:
why so long? you must be interested or you would have long since left
1/ 99% of this thread is about an unrealistic things to be
why
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 01:42 schrieb Robin Paulson:
>
> are we duplicating work? familiar is 6+ years old, i'm sure they must
> have some good ideas that can be used? maybe we can make openmoko a
> fork from their project?
>
Robin,
please read down to the bottom of the status page.
All moder
damn, wrong address, sorry oleg. repost. twice
can someone at openmoko fix the auto-generated reply-to fields on this
mailing-list? every time this gets me
On 6/13/07, Oleg Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HTC phones are commodity hardware that anybody can buy
right here and right now. Linux on
(sorry for my english)
I'm subscribed for this this thread for about 6m now. I don't want to
be rude but:
1/ 99% of this thread is about an unrealistic things to be
implemented on a non existent (underpowered) device. Who in the World
cares about things being discussed in this thread? People
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 00:31 schrieb Steven **:
>
> Seems like xda-developers.com is focused on reverse engineering cell
> phones. Specifically because the company that made those phones wouldn't
> give them the information. And that's better than FIC how?
>
HTC phones are commodity hardware
(correction)
Because is clear who is a foe and who is a friend
Sorry, you are already too blinded to understand...
At 00:31 13.6.2007, Steven ** wrote:
Seems like
xda-developers.com is focused on
reverse engineering cell phones. Specifically because the company
that made those phones wouldn
Becose is clear who is a foe and who is a friend
Sorry you are to blinded to understand...
At 00:31 13.6.2007, Steven ** wrote:
Seems like
xda-developers.com is focused on
reverse engineering cell phones. Specifically because the company
that made those phones wouldn't give them the informa
Seems like xda-developers.com is focused on reverse engineering cell
phones. Specifically because the company that made those phones wouldn't
give them the information. And that's better than FIC how? FIC is giving
us the information! How is that bad?
-Steven
On 6/12/07, Milan Votava <[EMAIL
You are all going to become slaves of capitalists (Sean on behalf of FIC).
Better to support guys from xda-developers.com (like cr2) to make
machines like HTC Universal a real free phones
Milan
At 22:51 12.6.2007, you wrote:
Jonathon Suggs wrote
> However, suggesting that people
> shoul
Jonathon Suggs wrote
> However, suggesting that people
> shouldn't be expressing their interests about features no matter how
> niche/picky/whatever is just plain wrong.
I specifically said, in my summary paragraph:
>>By all means give them feedback, tell them your desires, etc. But please
>>don
First, the mailing list is to be used for ideas and communication. You
are absolutely correct that FIC will have to make the final decisions
about what is and isn't included. However, suggesting that people
shouldn't be expressing their interests about features no matter how
niche/picky/whate
I agree definitely with the parts that I excerpted below from what John
said, and would further like to point out what I personally see as one of
the major strengths of this project: To show the world and other device
makers that there can be a market for open mobile devices/phones. Of course
this
16 matches
Mail list logo
