Each of them is described in a case in Mauritian court. Feel free to pull the
cases. They should not be hard to find.
Owen
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 09:10, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 02:14 , DANIEL NANGHAKA wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder why some members can't let the court
> On Dec 30, 2021, at 02:14 , DANIEL NANGHAKA wrote:
>
> I wonder why some members can't let the court of law do its work.
>
> AFRINIC has provided updates to the community where necessity of the update
> is important.
Several of which have contained false or misleading claims and most of
In message
Ibeanusi Elvis wrote:
>The press release is in no way obstructing the functionality and the
>ability of the court to carry out its duties nor is it misleading the
>community. There is nothing vague, defamatory or "not facts" about the
>press release...
It alleges "multiple"
In message
DANIEL NANGHAKA wrote:
>AFRINIC has provided updates to the community where necessity of the update
>is important.
>
>If CI is to do there press releases, there is no problem as it is also
>noted that they should present facts and not mislead the community.
>
>CI's press release
In message
Ibeanusi Elvis wrote:
>This "sockpuppet" ideology and terminology that has become an excessively
>overused irrelevant term in this mailing list. What is wrong with sharing a
>link of interest or a link that a member consider relevant to him/herself.
>Freedom of expression is always
Hello Daniel,
The press release is in no way obstructing the functionality and the
ability of the court to carry out its duties nor is it misleading the
community. There is nothing vague, defamatory or “not facts” about the
press release. Rather I will recommend you should study more about the
On 30 Dec 2021, at 6:32 AM, Mathanya Ramaboea
mailto:mathanyaw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
How is any press release obstructing the court's job and misleading the
community? Here it is obviously directed at CI's clients, which is a normal
move from any private company.
Judging from the info in the
How is any press release obstructing the court's job and misleading
the community? Here it is obviously directed at CI's clients, which is a
normal move from any private company.
Judging from the info in the statement published, I think necessity of
update should come from both AFRINIC and CI
I wonder why some members can't let the court of law do its work.
AFRINIC has provided updates to the community where necessity of the update
is important.
If CI is to do there press releases, there is no problem as it is also
noted that they should present facts and not mislead the community.
Are you saying that the cloud innovation press release contains false,
misleading, or inaccurate defamatory claims about afrinic?
Owen
> On Dec 28, 2021, at 12:38, John Curran wrote:
>
>
>> On 28 Dec 2021, at 2:49 PM, Mathanya Ramaboea wrote:
>>
>> I highly appreciate CI's good
Dear AfriNIC's Community,
...comment below inline, please.
Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 21:38, John Curran a écrit :
>
> On 28 Dec 2021, at 2:49 PM, Mathanya Ramaboea
> wrote:
>
> I highly appreciate CI's good communication with its clients regarding the
> development of the lawsuit but I also agree
On 28 Dec 2021, at 2:49 PM, Mathanya Ramaboea
mailto:mathanyaw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I highly appreciate CI's good communication with its clients regarding the
development of the lawsuit but I also agree that it would be good to see what
AFRINIC also has to say on the matter, to its members
I highly appreciate CI's good communication with its clients regarding the
development of the lawsuit but I also agree that it would be good to see
what AFRINIC also has to say on the matter, to its members and everyone
else in the community. It is normal that the case involves a certain level
of
Ibeanusi made a good point, but Mike made a much better point.
I must say afrinic and cloud innovation/larus are really duking it out at
each other's throat, seeing how even afrinic is breaching court's order
based on the link provided by Cheken. But i'll hold my reservations until i
hear
On 12/28/21 10:36, Mike Silber wrote:
The key difference is that when AfriNIC shares an update, it is from
an organizational email account and the person’s affiliation is
clearly stated.
It is not paid shills pretending to be objective and impartial
“community members” yet pushing a
Right on Mike. Thank you.
Regards,
Daniel
> On Dec 28, 2021, at 11:36 AM, Mike Silber wrote:
>
> The key difference is that when AfriNIC shares an update, it is from an
> organizational email account and the person’s affiliation is clearly stated.
>
> It is not paid shills pretending to
The key difference is that when AfriNIC shares an update, it is from an
organizational email account and the person’s affiliation is clearly stated.
It is not paid shills pretending to be objective and impartial “community
members” yet pushing a specific (and presumably paid) objective.
I
Hello All,
This “sockpuppet” ideology and terminology that has become an excessively
overused irrelevant term in this mailing list. What is wrong with sharing a
link of interest or a link that a member consider relevant to him/herself.
Freedom of expression is always promoted in this community as
I don’t see anything wrong with someone sharing a link of interest to some
mailing lists. The past updates have been shared by AFRINIC itself or a
community member that wanted to transmit the information and hardly anyone
considered that a « sockpuppet » act. Only the two parties involved in the
19 matches
Mail list logo
