Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-11 Thread Dewole Ajao
<community-discuss@afrinic.net> *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do not attempt to declare anything on my behalf. If an applicant knows the community sees in re

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Andrew Alston
...@posix.co.za; General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do not attempt to declare anything on my

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Boubakar Barry
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Mark Elkins wrote: > > When we are in the Soft-Landing part of IPv4 or better still, the last > 25% of soft-landing - then maybe this could be an appropriate idea. The > community can view and therefore report on any suspicious applications. >

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 07/11/2016 17:15, Dewole Ajao wrote: > Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do > not attempt to declare anything on my behalf. I'm afraid that was the first thought that came to mind. I'm probably not alone. My thought is also not about you, but the idea. > If

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do not attempt to declare anything on my behalf. If an applicant knows the community sees in realtime, he/she is less likely to put in phony stuff that just wastes the hostmasters' time and increases the time taken to process

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 07/11/2016 16:53, Dewole Ajao wrote: > Once a week is good. ARIN has a daily issued feed but that's a bit > different from what I'm suggesting. > > I agree the actual allocated/assigned ranges need not be disclosed; I do > however think that sharing the names of (applicant) organizations

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Once a week is good. ARIN has a daily issued feed but that's a bit different from what I'm suggesting. I agree the actual allocated/assigned ranges need not be disclosed; I do however think that sharing the names of (applicant) organizations will help with responsibility and possibly reduce

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
Interesting. I think though a once-a-week stats figure would be sufficient - perhaps with a projected end date? I've seen that before somewhere AFRINIC should not give out the names of the organisations receiving the address space or the actual ranges themselves though. On 07/11/2016 16:29,

[Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Dear Community, I was wondering if anyone else thinks it would be useful to see weekly/daily details (in human readable format) of new applications and approvals for Internet number resources perhaps as a weekly/daily email from AFRINIC to this (or the members) list. Given increased