Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

Hello Alan, Thanks for sending this across, a few "personal" comments below: 1. For item 7: I think 13.8b is sufficient hence 13.8c may not be needed; We don't have to formerly restrict things to that extent. 2. For item 12: I am not sure the proposed resolution would change the fact that

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

> On 5 Nov 2016, at 14:53, Seun Ojedeji wrote: > > Hello Alan, > > Thanks for sending this across, a few "personal" comments below: > > 1. For item 7: I think 13.8b is sufficient hence 13.8c may not be needed; We > don't have to formerly restrict things to that

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

> On 5 Nov 2016, at 00:46, Andrew Alston > wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > I believe Point 5 may result in conflict with Article 13.4 that states that > directors represent specific regions. For consistency 13.4 would also need > modification. Perhaps we should

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

Hi Alan, I’m kinda on the fence about the changes referred to below. Historically, we have said that regional representation means that at the time of election, the individual must be domiciled in the region for each he is standing. Looking at the bylaws, this seems to be a requirement that