> On 5 Nov 2016, at 00:46, Andrew Alston <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > I believe Point 5 may result in conflict with Article 13.4 that states that > directors represent specific regions. For consistency 13.4 would also need > modification.
Perhaps we should change 13.4 to say that the Directors in seats 1 to 6 should “reside in”, not “represent”, the six sub-regions. Historically, we have had Directors who changed their place of residence after being elected, such that they no longer resided in the relevant sub-region, but they did not resign. > I believe that section 16 is also in conflict with the companies act. The > companies act specifically states that a director may only be removed in a > meeting dedicated to that purpose with that being the only item on the > agenda. So while I have no problem with the community being able to recall a > director, it must be through a dedicated meeting and not through the addition > of an agenda item at a regular meeting. I’ll check on that, and make a suitable chaneg if necessary. Alan Barrett _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
