Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

>I don’t understand how we could keep electronic voting open for a few days >after the meeting. How could we count the votes and announce the result if >voting is still >open? Right, wasn't thinking. Had more the PDP stuff in my mind, but it wouldn't work.

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 14:54, Alan Barrett wrote: >> On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:17, Dewole Ajao wrote: >> >> Perhaps we could ask from the members what the concerns are with electronic >> voting that make them prefer proxies. These should be addressed

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:17, Dewole Ajao wrote: > > Perhaps we could ask from the members what the concerns are with electronic > voting that make them prefer proxies. These should be addressed (where > possible) to make e-voting more attractive to them. I know that, in

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

Perhaps we could ask from the members what the concerns are with electronic voting that make them prefer proxies. These should be addressed (where possible) to make e-voting more attractive to them. While last-minute deciders may desire to keep e-voting open for a while longer than onsite

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 11:33, Saul Stein wrote: > > Personally i would like to focus on removing the need to have proxies in the > first place. > > We need to be able to easily vote for elections, resolutions and policy > online. > Open the voting a week before and keep

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

> On 13 Nov 2016, at 09:56, Badru Ntege wrote: > I think this can be brought to rest if we get a position from the Afrinic > Legal council then subsequent legal discussion would be based on a fixed > organisational position. I have requested a clear statement

Re: [Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

Alan I think this can be brought to rest if we get a position from the Afrinic Legal council then subsequent legal discussion would be based on a fixed organisational position. I see this as the quickest route to closure. I believe we need to close these open issues quicker by narrowing

[Community-Discuss] Limit on the number of proxies

[I changed the subject to match the discussion] > On 12 Nov 2016, at 10:17, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote: > On 11/11/2016 15:47, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote: >> Dear Chairman and CEO of AfriNIC, >> >> The discussion on accountability on this list led to the issue of the >>