CLARIFICATION: RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread O'brien, Tim
I hope no one thought that I meant that only PMC members can change Wiki content. My proposal still involves the public being able to change Wiki, just centralizing the oversight. Tim O'Brien -Original Message- From: O'brien, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Oversight of content relating to a specific PMC should be the repsonsibility of said PMC. That is one view. There may be others. I believe that there is interest in having a consensus on policy first, and then a solution. Not too many people have spoken up one way or another on that issue.

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread O'brien, Tim
Oversight of content relating to a specific PMC should be the repsonsibility of said PMC. That is one view. There may be others. I understand, and I don't mean to silence discussion at all. Just trying to offer a very concrete proposal. It is not clear that PMCs like [Web Service]

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The three WikiAdmins are neither official nor representatives of a proper oversight body. The most logical group would be those who are responsible for the site module, and I don't believe that they want it. Well - the PMC's could each volunteer

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Dirk-Willem van Gulik: Noel J. Bergman wrote: The three WikiAdmins are neither official nor representatives of a proper oversight body. The most logical group would be those who are responsible for the site module, and I don't believe that they want it. Well - the PMC's could each

Re: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Ben Hyde
My understanding ... The current Wiki, not being under any PMC oversight, would go away. I hope we don't tear down the current one for a bit, make sure the PMC owned ones are a functional replacement. Put some markings on the current one. Move content, leave interlinks. Try to nudge people

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I hope we don't tear down the current one for a bit, make sure the PMC owned ones are a functional replacement. I understand your concern about data loss, and share it. See my comment about starting the new ones as clones of the current one. And no need to take down the old one (maybe make it

Re: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Ben Hyde
Noel J. Bergman wrote: I hope we don't tear down the current one for a bit, make sure the PMC owned ones are a functional replacement. I understand your concern about data loss, and share it. See my comment about starting the new ones as clones of the current one. And no need to take down the

RE: Wiki - we've got a proposed solution - hierarchy

2003-02-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Thinking about it some more. I guess my concern is less about the data and more about the people. I'm most concerned about pulling the rug out from under people having fun before their a place they can move their fun to. I'm sure we can make the migration work. :-) We wouldn't remove any