Re: [Info] Jini goes OSS.

2005-01-20 Thread Henri Yandell
All sounds great but the open sourcing of the spec confuses me. How 
exactly is that going to work? Has anyone open-sourced a spec before?

Will the official version of the Jini spec remain within the JCP?
Hen
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
FWIW,
Sun have decided to put the Jini specification, documentation and reference
implementations under an OSS license. Early on, the discussion of which
licensed circled around; BSD, MIT and ALv2.
After a lengthy debate on the pros and cons, especially in respect of the
patent rights expressed in ALv2 vs BSD/MIT + a separate 'patent promise', it
seems that the Jini community have swayed Sun from initially wanting to use
the MIT license to now go for the ALv2.
Other Jini contributors, will be encouraged to license their projects in the
same manner.
What this means for the Java community at large, is that Jini can finally
a) be adopted as a core technology in many fields,
b) new exciting Jini applications can be developed from scratch,
c) the OSS communities can take a shot at improving the reference
implementation,
d) even implementing the specs from scratch if we like.
It will still take the Jini team some time to get all the paper work sorted
out over at Sun.
I think this news together with the arrival of JDO at ASF are the best news, I
have heard in a long time.
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [Info] Jini goes OSS.

2005-01-20 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 20 January 2005 05:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
 All sounds great but the open sourcing of the spec confuses me. How
 exactly is that going to work? Has anyone open-sourced a spec before?

AFAIU, that is a reference to the fact that the specification contains 
classes, that have previously also been under the SCSL and negatively 
impacted the spread of Jini.

 Will the official version of the Jini spec remain within the JCP?

Jini has its own community process (consisting of two Houses, one for 
corporations and one for individuals) and that will remain. Sun has indicated 
that they don't intend to start a separate foundation/organization similar to 
ASF or Eclipse, and think (together with many community members) that the 
current jini.org setup is in other aspects good.


Cheers
Niclas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]