flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread 孙廉焘
Hi all, I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu. I have done these steps: sudo apt-get install netpbm lynx svn checkout https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/qemu-neo1973 cd qemu-neo1973 ./configure --target-list=arm-softmmu

Re: flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread Rod Whitby
孙廉焘 wrote: I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu. openmoko/download.sh openmoko/flash.sh After openmoko/flash.sh, the output information is listed briefly as following(full version is an attachment): ls:

Re: flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread Gordon Syme
孙廉焘 wrote: Hi all, I have a problem, when I setup the qemu-neo1973 envirement followed by http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qemu. I have done these steps: sudo apt-get install netpbm lynx svn checkout https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/qemu-neo1973 cd qemu-neo1973 ./configure

Re: flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread 孙廉焘
Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme! I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now! What I have done is: 1. modified kernel_wildcard variable in the openmoko/env file, replacing '-neo1973' with '-fic-gta01'; 2. run openmoko/download.sh, and the uImage-2.6.21.5-r3-fic-gta01.bin

Re: flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread Sudharshan S
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:47 +0800, 孙廉焘 wrote: Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme! I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now! What I have done is: 1. modified kernel_wildcard variable in the openmoko/env file, replacing '-neo1973' with '-fic-gta01'; 2. run

Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
Hello, I apologize that my bi-weekly update is a little late for this period. This is mostly due to traveling on my part. The update today is more organizational than technical. OpenMoko has added some key positions and some key people in those positions. This should help move the project

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Mike Montour
Michael Shiloh wrote: To save time, please refrain from re-opening previous discussions. Re-opening implies that there has been some previous closure, vs. a discussion that just trailed off into silence. Could you please provide regular updates on important items that are still open, even

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Adam
The current neo1973 is not FCC approved to operate in the 850Mhz band. It would be illegal for FIC to sell the device in the US with it activated. BT and PCS is the only approved band currently. http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUNpc=GTA01BV4 Mike Montour wrote: Michael

Re: HD8X FCC approved

2007-10-31 Thread Ian Darwin
... I'm assuming that it runs or will run Openmoko. Tim O'Reilly said so too: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/10/dash_web2summit_openmoko.html ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

HD8X FCC approved

2007-10-31 Thread Adam
Sorry if this has been posted before. FCC: http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUNpc=HXD8V2 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/HXD8 It is called Dash Express. http://dash.net/ instead of dash.org NameDash Express Screen 4.3 480x320 WQVGA Flash3 GB CPU Samsung s3c2440

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On 10/31/07, Mike Montour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Delivery of the promised 'gllin' GPS binary to GTA01 owners (anything that can be made to work, OABI/EABI/chrooted/whatever) Yes. Again, it has been much, much, much too long that we have been waiting for this.

Re: HD8X FCC approved

2007-10-31 Thread Ortwin Regel
I hope their awesome fresh software will run on our Neo1973s, too. I'd gladly pay money for that stuff. :) Would be great if they could keep the data open, though. Anyone from Dash around who can comment a little more on what is planned? Ortwin On 10/31/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: HD8X FCC approved

2007-10-31 Thread Joshua Layne
Adam wrote: Sorry if this has been posted before. FCC: http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/fcc_query.php?gc=EUNpc=HXD8V2 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/HXD8 It is called Dash Express. http://dash.net/ instead of dash.org NameDash Express Screen 4.3 480x320 WQVGA Flash3 GB CPU

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
Mike Montour wrote: Michael Shiloh wrote: To save time, please refrain from re-opening previous discussions. Re-opening implies that there has been some previous closure, vs. a discussion that just trailed off into silence. Could you please provide regular updates on important items that

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on. I thought the legal issue was resolved. ___ OpenMoko

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on. Michael Shawn Rutledge wrote: On 10/31/07, Mike Montour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Delivery of the promised 'gllin' GPS binary to GTA01 owners (anything

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
Shawn Rutledge wrote: On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. You do realize that it is a legal issue that has been holding this up. But true, this is needed, and I'll find out what's going on. I thought the legal issue was resolved. Sorry for the confusion. I went back

Current status, and previous Community Updates: wiki page

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like to see addressed. I've also created a page for each previous Community Update, for reference. http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Community_Updates I'd like to consolidate

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first legal issue was to allow for the distribution of the driver in binary-only form. That was resolved. The next issue was technical, and resulted from the switch from OABI to EABI. That issue has a number of workarounds (wrapper,

Re: Current status, and previous Community Updates: wiki page

2007-10-31 Thread John Morrison
On Wed, October 31, 2007 8:18 pm, Michael Shiloh wrote: I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like to see addressed. I've also created a page for each previous Community Update, for reference.

Re: Current status, and previous Community Updates: wiki page

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
John Morrison wrote: One thing that I would like to suggest is that any time you reference a relative date you qualify it with the date you added the comment to the wiki. Good point. Done. Michael ___ OpenMoko community mailing list

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Shiloh
Shawn Rutledge wrote: On 10/31/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first legal issue was to allow for the distribution of the driver in binary-only form. That was resolved. The next issue was technical, and resulted from the switch from OABI to EABI. That issue has a number of

Re: Community Update

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Arvidson
The modem licensing is a big deal breaker for me. I purchased a quad-band phone because I live in the US and need 850 coverage. I knew it is developer preview beta phone, and was willing to contribute and wait until the software is ready. If the phone is not going to be licensed for all four

Re: Current status, and previous Community Updates: wiki page

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Arvidson
I suggest using the signing tool (). --sagacis On 10/31/07, John Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, October 31, 2007 8:18 pm, Michael Shiloh wrote: I've created a wiki page to consolidate the current status, and provide a place for you to add questions and topics you'd like to see

Re: flash.sh failed when setup qemu-neo1973

2007-10-31 Thread Rod Whitby
Sudharshan S wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:47 +0800, 孙廉焘 wrote: Thanks to the help of Rod and Gordon Syme! I have solved the problem and qemu-neo-1973 is running now! I think this has been fixed from r3304. http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/commitlog/2007-October/002946.html No,