Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Christian Rüb
On Monday, 19. July 2010 21:04:54 Petr Vanek wrote:
 I prepared u-boot to set new timings by default:
 www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/glamo/242/u-boot_glamo242.udfu
 
 
 sounds great! is there a qi version setting up these parameters?
 running system from uSD is much easier with qi...
 
 no qi? too bad :(
 
 Petr

I would also like to test this with qi - any chance to get this?

Christian

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread ghislain

I've applied the glamo patch to the qi-bootloader I use for the QtMoko
installer-images. You can download the qi-bootloader here [1].
It replaces the qi.img file in the installer image so you can reflash with
this new bootloader.
It is, of course, also possible to flash this new bootloader using dfu-util

Ghislain
http://www.basetrend.nl BaseTrend  -  http://www.openmobile.nl openmobile.nl 

[1] http://www.openmobile.nl/pages/downloads.php#qiglamo
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/Glamo-slowness-question-Glamo-transfer-speed-improvements-33-Video-sofdecoding-playing-profile-Glamo-tp5307224p5315542.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Petr Vanek
I've applied the glamo patch to the qi-bootloader I use for the QtMoko
installer-images. You can download the qi-bootloader here [1].
It replaces the qi.img file in the installer image so you can reflash
with this new bootloader.
It is, of course, also possible to flash this new bootloader using
dfu-util

Ghislain
http://www.basetrend.nl BaseTrend  -  http://www.openmobile.nl
openmobile.nl 

[1] http://www.openmobile.nl/pages/downloads.php#qiglamo

sounds great, seems to be this one [1], testing now

thanks a milion

Petr


1. http://www.openmobile.nl/modules/download_gallery/dlc.php?file=53


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:17, ghislain ghisl...@basetrend.nl wrote:

 I've applied the glamo patch to the qi-bootloader I use for the QtMoko
 installer-images. You can download the qi-bootloader here [1].
 It replaces the qi.img file in the installer image so you can reflash with
 this new bootloader.
 It is, of course, also possible to flash this new bootloader using dfu-util

 Ghislain
 http://www.basetrend.nl BaseTrend  -  http://www.openmobile.nl openmobile.nl

 [1] http://www.openmobile.nl/pages/downloads.php#qiglamo

Could you please give us also a patch for that? I would like to
compile some overclocked Qi's with this Glamo tweak.

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread ghislain

Attached you will find my diff.

http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/file/n5316379/qi.diff
qi.diff 

Ghislain
http://www.basetrend.nl BaseTrend  -  http://www.openmobile.nl openmobile.nl 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/Glamo-slowness-question-Glamo-transfer-speed-improvements-33-Video-sofdecoding-playing-profile-Glamo-tp5307224p5316379.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Thomas HOCEDEZ
 Sounds very nice !

I tried on SHR-u, booted on a beautiful openmoko logo, then nothing.
When I tried to boot on u-boot, a single nokernel found message is
shown ...
So here's a question : Is it only for QTmoko ?



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Radek Polak
On Tuesday 20 July 2010 14:37:49 Thomas HOCEDEZ wrote:

 I tried on SHR-u, booted on a beautiful openmoko logo, then nothing.
 When I tried to boot on u-boot, a single nokernel found message is
 shown ...
 So here's a question : Is it only for QTmoko ?

SHR kernel is  2MB and uboot can have problems loading such kernel. You 
either need to adjust uboot env or try qi which does not have this limit.

Regards

Radek

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-20 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors

Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz writes:
 SHR kernel is  2MB and uboot can have problems loading such kernel. You 
 either need to adjust uboot env or try qi which does not have this limit.

Why would u-boot have problems with  2MB? Isn't it just that people
have configured their u-boot to only load 2MB in the configuration?

-Timo

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-19 Thread Petr Vanek
I prepared u-boot to set new timings by default:
www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/glamo/242/u-boot_glamo242.udfu


sounds great! is there a qi version setting up these parameters?
running system from uSD is much easier with qi...

no qi? too bad :(

Petr


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread David Garabana Barro
O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu:
 Hi, list.
 
 Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :)

Being a FR user since the beginning, it's really amazing to see how it 
improved since 2007.2 and 2008.x/2009.x distros, in usability, prettiness and 
speed (specially due to Thomas work on xorg glamo, your findings on kernel 
speedup and CPU/memory clocking, and FSO port to vala)

Thank you very much to you and Thomas for not throwing the towel, and of 
course, thank you to all people behind FSO, e, SHR, Debian on FR, qtmoko, 
Hackable:1...

Our Free mobile dream is nearest than ever! :o)

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2010/7/17 Gennady Kupava g...@bsdmn.com:
 Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :)

A great way to rant :)

The glamo timing fix seems to work great here so far. Regarding the
older thread, I finally tested also it with the 500/83 CPU/memclock
setting (533/88 hanged during boot when most of the system was already
running), and it also worked fine. However, CPU overclocking probably
increases power consumption, while the glamo boosting is probably
quite pure win over-all, especially considering that glamo is the
biggest bottle-neck anyway in the device.

 Expecting some reports from users, did it work for you flawlessly?

So far, yes.

 2. --- DMA transfers
...
 Conclusion -  implementing dma for mmc and glamo may provide speedup to
 system, also it may reduce emergy consumption (as cpu may sleep while
 dma transfer is active)

That's interesting as well, since it would be again be overall win in
all aspects.

Thanks a lot for the work so far, you are the heroes making FreeRunner
project all the more interesting and unique :)

-Timo

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread Petr Vanek
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:42:19 +0400
Gennady Kupava g...@bsdmn.com (GK) wrote:


1.6. --- How to test/use it

I used this settings by default for several days with qtmokoV24 and
with debian on usd.

I prepared u-boot to set new timings by default:
www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/glamo/242/u-boot_glamo242.udfu


sounds great! is there a qi version setting up these parameters? running
system from uSD is much easier with qi...

thank you

Petr


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread David Garabana Barro
O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu:
 Hi, list.
 
 Here is my next rant to freerunner slowness :)

 You should get for new timings:
 Old value:
 addr[4808]=0x80 0x13 0x00 0x00
 
 Expecting some reports from users, did it work for you flawlessly?

r...@om-gta02 ~/Cosas/Soft/utils # ./memwrite 1207959560
pagesize = 4096
basepage=4800, baseoff = 0008, destaddr = 4808
Old value:
addr[88142008]=0x80 0x13 0x00 0x00

It seems to work ok for me, tested on SHR-U and qtmoko

I'm currently using shr-u, will report any problem...


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread David Garabana Barro
O Domingo, 18 de Xullo de 2010 18:17:07 David Garabana Barro escribiu:
 O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu:
 
 I'm currently using shr-u, will report any problem...

I had a WSOD shutting down, but not yet during normal use. 
As with new kernel WSOD are back again (at least rotating screen), I don't 
know if it's related to glamo timings or it was a kernel problem.

I made some tests, with neon and neolight:

neolight strobe @ 80 ms

Although you can see filling, it's noticeably faster @ 242

CPU use @ 444
xorg60
python  10
idle30

CPU use @ 242
xorg44
python  7
idle47

neon continously scrolling big (1379x1916) photo. Scroll is visibly smoother

CPU use @ 444
python  50
xorg44
idle0

CPU use @ 242
python  55
xorg40
idle0


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread Tha_Man

Wow, you're doing an awesome job here!! I've tried it on my QtMoko V24
running from NAND and it works great, the interface is noticeably faster and
so is a more intensive program like Navit. Everything seems to work as it
should, suspending and resuming is fine. 
As Timo Jyrinki already mentioned, this is just pure performance gain,
superb! I am, however, very much interested in a stable overclock as well
:-) (as suspend and resume don't work on QtMoko v24, as reported in the
other thread)
If there is anything I (we) can help you with or test for you, please me
know.

Cheers,
Tha_Man
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/Glamo-slowness-question-Glamo-transfer-speed-improvements-33-Video-sofdecoding-playing-profile-Glamo-tp5307224p5309500.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-18 Thread David Garabana Barro
O Sábado, 17 de Xullo de 2010 22:42:19 Gennady Kupava escribiu:
 Hi, list.
 
 Expecting some reports from users, did it work for you flawlessly?

One small problem I found

When you get a WSOD (rotating screen), if you just reboot, you obtain a WSOD 
on every following reboot

You MUST halt device for getting it back to normality.
I suppose something is not correctly initialized in glamo with modified uboot.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements (+33%). Video sofdecoding playing profile. Glamo dma transfer.

2010-07-17 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors

Gennady Kupava g...@bsdmn.com writes:
 I tested default(AKA slow) and fast timing settings for -vo x11 and -vo
 fbdev. The settings with different vo's are not directly comparable, as
 different libc used occasionally, so only (slow/x11 and fast/x11) and
 (slow/fbdev and fast/fbdev) are comparable.

 The profiling setup is opcontrol --start; mplayer ... ; opcontrol --stop

Which kernel? branch and commit hash + config file would be important
to be able to reproduce these results.

Also which version of mplayer? Can you put the video file online too
so that others can test? Did you encode it yourself? (If yes, how?
:-))


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community