Re: [Components] YAML: design document

2009-06-14 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Thomas Nunninger wrote: Why did I wrote this email then? I just wanted to make clear: it's not that easy to exchange Stream and String as the first reads/writes to streams whereas the latter gets a string parameter resp. returns a string. Is this ok then? Or do you still

Re: [Components] YAML: design document

2009-06-04 Thread Thomas Nunninger
Hi, finally I'm able to go on with the YAML component. Derick, thanks for your feedback. One point needs some clarification: Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 12:00:54 schrieb Derick Rethans: @TODO: we are not sure about the ``eczYamlString*`` classes. - I think it's important to have, as they

Re: [Components] YAML: design document

2009-04-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Thomas Nunninger wrote: we managed to overwork the YAML design document according to the feedback we got. The API is straightened and we added a part about the main classes. You can find the document at