Darren Cook: <4b1af9bd.3020...@dcook.org>:
>> Rank NameAuthor Score*
>> ...
>> 11 Katsunari Shinich Sei 2
>>
>> Katsunari used alpha-beta search and the others used MCTS.
>
>Katsunari came second at the UEC cup, but last at GPW Cup.
Thanks. I tried giving both fuego and MFGO 16K playouts and stopped at with
MFGO winning 123/135 = 91% +- 4%. I'm starting again with your suggestions:
uct_param_player ignore_clock 1
uct_param_player max_games 16000
uct_param_search number_threads 1
uct_param_player ponder 0
go_param_rules ko_r
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:05:27AM +0900, Darren Cook wrote:
> > I expected to win 50 to 60% of the games, but won 88% of 1300 games. There
> > were several games that Fuego lost due to a superko violation.
> >
> > Am I missing a parameter to set the rules to Chinese with superko?
>
> go_rules c
> Rank NameAuthor Score*
> ...
> 11Katsunari Shinich Sei 2
>
> Katsunari used alpha-beta search and the others used MCTS.
Katsunari came second at the UEC cup, but last at GPW Cup. I know there
was some grumbling over the seeding
> uct_param_player ignore_clock 1
> uct_param_player max_games 8000
> uct_param_search number_threads 1
> uct_command_player ponder 0
I learnt the other day that ignore_clock only ignores the game time
settings, but there is still a default 10 seconds per move. To get rid
of that add:
go_param t
Good suggestion. I was getting a little worried about overtuning against
Gnugo, since it's the only program I've ever tested against.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Petr Baudis
> Sent: Sa
I'm not testing Fuego against MFGO. I'm using Fuego as part of the MFGO
regression tests in place of Gnugo. My test machines are all Windows, as
are all of my test scripts. So I don't need the strongest Fuego. I just
want a fast, strong program that is better than gnugo.
David
From: com
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:41:49PM +0100, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> There's no reason why something like a go engine should care what the
> underlying OS is.
Not until it gets multi-threaded, AFAIK pthread emulation by cygwin is
far from optimal because threading model in Win32 is very differen
Ben Lambrechts wrote:
> If you really want to test MFOG against Fuego, it is better to run Fuego
> on a strong Linux-machine.
> The Cygwin-version is significantly slower than the full-build I have on
> the same machine with Fedora.
Isn't that just a matter of using a cygwin version with the same
Has anyone tried running Fuego on linux via VM on Windows? Is it faster than
cygwin-Fuego on Windows? (I don't know how much VM performance varies but
http://www.virtualbox.org/ is freely available for testing.) With a newer
version of Windows and a multi-core machine it might not a bad optio
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:54:39PM -0800, David Fotland wrote:
> Many Faces is getting too strong for Gnugo. I test using 8K playouts per
> move on 19x19 and win about 89% of the games.
Is there a specific reason for insisting on even games? I still
sometimes do tests on 9x9 (e.g. some slight re-
If you really want to test MFOG against Fuego, it is better to run Fuego on
a strong Linux-machine.
The Cygwin-version is significantly slower than the full-build I have on the
same machine with Fedora.
I provide the Cygwin for people who are not familiar enough with linux or
are not able to build
12 matches
Mail list logo
