I don't mind the playing strength of the opponents.
More programs more fun!
Hideki
Nick Wedd: CAEVtG+PF=xmgtvpgskx5lqhsazsy5zodk2e37qd8qjl263w...@mail.gmail.com:
I will be willing to welcome players of all strengths, if that is what the
strong players want.
My reason for excluding weaker
McMahon relies on the players having reliable ratings. Many don't.
Nick
On 1 April 2015 at 14:30, Erik van der Werf erikvanderw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Perhaps switch to McMahon?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Darren Cook dar...@dcook.org wrote:
I will be willing to welcome players of all
In view of the responses I have received, I have opened up entry to weaker
players.
I like David's idea of a requirement of some specified CGOS rating. I'll
say 1100 for
now, and see how it works out. When I look at CGOS, it gives me lists of
ratings
for 9x9 and 13x13 (which covers the April
Because 13x13 is the one that is working, so folks are playing at that board
size.
I do not think it matters much that the rating come from the same board size as
the tournament. The point is just to get programs that have crossed to some
minimal level of maturity, and some of the programs
BTW I greatly appreciate all the input! and put in TODO.txt
Since I do plan to make this open source and ON github.
Guess I'm looking for helper developers
I own like 12 servers so can host, while keeping the solid boardspace in tact.
In fact I just bought 2 more servers, 1 real 1
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:10:00PM +0200, N.N. wrote:
I searched the web for more than one hour and didn't fin a general go
mailing list.
I found lists but they belong to clubs academy's or federations.
Thank you for your time.
Perhaps the most active discussion forum is
Hello,
I searched the web for more than one hour and didn't fin a general go
mailing list.
I found lists but they belong to clubs academy's or federations.
Thank you for your time.
Alain.
--
Complex numbers: They are all fun and games until someone loses an i.
