]
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Mogo MCTS is not UCT ?
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS.
A complicated formula mixing
(i) patterns (ii) rules (iii) rave values (iv) online
regard,
Denis FIDAALI.
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:55:03 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Mogo MCTS is not UCT ?
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS.
There are only two things i dislike about UCT :
- It's slow to compute.
- It's deterministic
I really wonder if there was an article describing
the new MCTS of mogo
On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Denis fidaali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS.
There are only two things i dislike about UCT :
- It's slow to compute.
- It's deterministic
I
Let's assume that the UCT formula is
UCTValue(parent, n) = winrate + sqrt((ln(parent.visits))/(5*n.nodevisits))
(taken from sensei library)
What is the Upper confidence bound term ? That would'nt be
sqrt((ln(parent.visits))/(5*n.nodevisits)) ??
I doubt that exploring only the move with
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS.
A complicated formula mixing
(i) patterns (ii) rules (iii) rave values (iv) online statistics
Also we have a little learning (i.e. late parts of simulations
are evolved
On 1-dec-08, at 18:55, Olivier Teytaud wrote:
I think it's now well known that Mogo doesn't use UCT.
I realize that i have no idea at all what Mogo do use for
it's MCTS.
A complicated formula mixing
(i) patterns (ii) rules (iii) rave values (iv) online statistics
Isn't that technically
