On Jan 6, 2008 11:37 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I get the whole picture regarding multi-dimensional
> > ratings. How can you compare two players with a 2-dimensional rating?
> > You can't, so how would one use this rating? In my book, a rating's
> > goal is to make t
x27;t seen strong statistical evidence for intransitivity in
> computer go, but I don't think anyone has looked very hard yet.
>
> - Dave Hillis
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Vlad Dumitrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: computer-go
> Sent: Sun, 6 Jan 200
sitivity in computer go,
but I don't think anyone has looked very hard yet.
- Dave Hillis
-Original Message-
From: Vlad Dumitrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Odd results on 19x19
On Jan 6, 2008 11:00 PM,
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 11:00 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The idea of a non one dimension rating model is interesting. If you
>> decide to pursue this I can give you the CGOS data in a compact format,
>> 1 line per result.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sur
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 11:00 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The idea of a non one dimension rating model is interesting. If you
decide to pursue this I can give you the CGOS data in a compact format,
1 line per result.
Hi all,
I'm not sure I get the whole pi
seful
than storing the n^2-n per-pair results.
s.
- Original Message
From: Vlad Dumitrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2008 5:12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Odd results on 19x19
On Jan 6, 2008 11:00 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 6, 2008 11:00 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of a non one dimension rating model is interesting. If you
> decide to pursue this I can give you the CGOS data in a compact format,
> 1 line per result.
Hi all,
I'm not sure I get the whole picture regarding multi-dimensi
Rémi,
The idea of a non one dimension rating model is interesting. If you
decide to pursue this I can give you the CGOS data in a compact format,
1 line per result.
I thought of this idea too, but I didn't try to produce a model.It
would be easier to test and build such a model however if
My guess is that this is a combination of some intransitivity and low
sample size. 100 games isn't very much data in the CS vs MFGO.
As far as intransivity, perhaps Crazy Stone has some particular
strength that works very well against a weakness in MFGO. The
values do not make a grea
Coulom
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 10:27 AM
> To: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [computer-go] Odd results on 19x19
>
> steve uurtamo wrote:
> > did you optimize parameters in MFGO by playing against
> > gnugo?
> >
> > that'd do it.
> >
> >
steve uurtamo wrote:
did you optimize parameters in MFGO by playing against
gnugo?
that'd do it.
s.
Well, I don't know about David, but I do _all_ my testing and optimizing
against GNU.
Rémi
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.or
David Fotland wrote:
The styles of CS (CS-9-17-10k-1CPU), MFGO (mfgo12exp-15), and GNUGO
(gnugo3.7.10_10) are different, and it's generating some odd results.
Many Faces beats GnuGo 70%. There are not many games, but this is
consistent with over 100 test games I've run.
CS beats GnuGo 55%. Ove
did you optimize parameters in MFGO by playing against
gnugo?
that'd do it.
s.
- Original Message
From: David Fotland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2008 12:52:10 PM
Subject: [computer-go] Odd results on 19x19
The styles of CS (CS-9-17-10k-
The styles of CS (CS-9-17-10k-1CPU), MFGO (mfgo12exp-15), and GNUGO
(gnugo3.7.10_10) are different, and it's generating some odd results.
Many Faces beats GnuGo 70%. There are not many games, but this is
consistent with over 100 test games I've run.
CS beats GnuGo 55%. Over 100 games played.
CS
14 matches
Mail list logo
