Yes, where is Suzie?
Seriously, CGOS tries to be programmer friendly and will be improved
to be more so.
Unfortunately you will not always get a tough opponent, but
this is impossible with an open server. However CGOS tries
hard to keep the opponents paired up fairly closely and you will
g
Hello,
> To generate this pain one needs a slightly stronger opponent. The
> pain-level of Gnu-Go is for Suzie on 9x9 already too low.
What you can do is to limit your program. For MoGo I test with 3k or 10k
simulations per move. Of course it is not in the real games conditions, but
at least th
Very stupid question: Were to I get a fool-proof description how to join
the tournament?
You know I am from the generation, were one travelled to tournament, shake
hand with the programmer of the opponent, entered the moves by hand
These internet tournaments are also a cultural shock.
C
Hi Chrilly,
I will help you all you need. The basics are described somewhere
but it amounts to this:
1. Make sure you program understands GTP
2. Get the client program from the KGS website. This is a
java program the "hooks up" to your program using GTP and
communicates with
Are we to assume that Size is starting to get good at 9x9 and can beat
Gnugo consistently?
- Don
Peter Woitke has done a great job in the last month. He deserves the "Hero
of the Suzie work" medal. Especially he fixed a lot of bugs. But on 19x19
its still not satisfactory, so Peter gave it a
- Original Message -
From: "alain Baeckeroot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "computer-go"
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Strongest 9x9 programm?
Having various opponents is the best way for improvement.
Yes, I fully agree
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 14:33 +0100, alain Baeckeroot wrote:
> > In server matches this kind of information is usually lost. One can
> write
> > the traces into a file, but practically one never checks it in the
> same way
> > than when sitting infront of the screen and seeing it "live". The
> imme
Are we to assume that Size is starting to get good at 9x9 and can beat
Gnugo consistently?
- Don
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 13:14 +0100, Chrilly wrote:
> > For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go
> Level
> > 16.
> > Is there something stronger around /available?
>
> Y
___
Hi Chrilly,
I watch my own programs play live on CGOS, I just watch the log file,
which also displays a diagram and all the INFO I want.
A new version of CGOS let's you watch the games lives in a beautiful GUI
interface - unfortunately I have too much going on to finalize it, but
it is close
Le lundi 1 janvier 2007 13:14, Chrilly a écrit :
> > For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go Level
> > 16.
> > Is there something stronger around /available?
>
> Yes there is cgos 9X9 ;)
>
> I am used to another development method. I watch the engine-engine-matches
> a
On 12/31/06, Chrilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go Level 16.
Is there something stronger around /available?
Did you consider trying CrazyStone ?
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/CrazyStone/
nando
_
For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go Level
16.
Is there something stronger around /available?
Yes there is cgos 9X9 ;)
I am used to another development method. I watch the engine-engine-matches
and I change the programm when I see a move which really hurts. I trus
Le dimanche 31 décembre 2006 19:22, Chrilly a écrit :
> For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go Level 16.
> Is there something stronger around /available?
Yes there is cgos 9X9 ;)
Happy new year.
Alain
___
computer-go mailing
For testing Suzie on 9x9 we (Peter Woitke and Chrilly) use Gnu-Go Level 16.
Is there something stronger around /available?
Chrilly
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
14 matches
Mail list logo
