of the node is threshold rather than ending
on a unseen node.
Sylvain
-Original Message-
From: Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dmitry Kamenetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED], computer-go
computer-go@computer-go.org
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:54:43 -0500
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [computer-go] UCT vs MC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dmitry Kamenetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:03:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [computer-go] UCT vs MC
Hello Dmitry,
Your code says that the value is backed up by sum and negation (line 26,
value := -value). But I don't see any negative values in your sample
PROTECTED]
To: Dmitry Kamenetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:03:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [computer-go] UCT vs MC
Hello Dmitry,
Your code says that the value is backed up by sum and negation (line
26,
value := -value). But I don't see any negative values in your
sample
tree
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:56 +0300, Dmitry Kamenetsky wrote:
Thank you for your answer. However, I am even more confused now. I
understand that - is for negamax, but I don't understand why it
became 1-. I am trying to implement your algorithm and I just want
to know what lines 7, 16 and 26
Hi Sylvain,
Your code says that the value is backed up by sum and negation (line 26,
value := -value). But I don't see any negative values in your sample tree,
or values greater than one. How do you actually back up values to the
root?
Sorry, it is value := 1-value. Thank you for pointing
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm curious about the full width depth and the principal variation depth to
compare UCT wilth alpha-beta.
The comparison is not so easy to do I think, because using MC as an
evaluation
function for alpha beta, you have to do several simulations for one
evaluation
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 3:56 AM
To: computer-go
Subject: Re: [computer-go] UCT vs MC
Hello and happy new year!
I have some questions about your paper...
Whouah that's a lot of questions :). I'll try to answer well.
I thought that the Monte Carlo evaluation
I seem to remember someone on this group a couple of years ago or so
saying that there won't be a 1 Dan 9x9 player anytime soon. I don't
remember the exact quote or who said it. I'm looking through the
archives but I can't find it. I would not name the person even when
I do, but it gives me
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 20:10 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious about the full width depth and the principal variation
depth to
compare UCT wilth alpha-beta.
The comparison is not so easy to do I think, because using MC as an
evaluation
function for alpha beta, you have to do
