On Jan 15, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Harri Salakoski wrote:
This is a mistake. There are often moves that are illegal for
black that
are big for white. If you don't let white play there, white can
lose a lot
of points. Connections through false eyes are one example.
Yep agree that, knowing that
On 16-jan-08, at 11:54, Christoph Birk wrote:
I think this is very wrong, like allowing suicide.
If you allow (or forbid) moves that cannot really (should) be
played in the
random games you are not sampling the true status of the board.
I think most people take a much too dogmatic point of
Mark Boon wrote:
On 16-jan-08, at 11:54, Christoph Birk wrote:
I think this is very wrong, like allowing suicide.
If you allow (or forbid) moves that cannot really (should) be played
in the
random games you are not sampling the true status of the board.
I think most people take a much
-go' computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: [computer-go] On average how many boardupdates/sec cantop
Goprograms do these days?
If a point is illegal for black, are you saying that black can never
play at that point, or are you saying white can
