Re: [computer-go] New scalability study : show uncertainty ?

2008-01-20 Thread Alain Baeckeroot
Le samedi 19 janvier 2008, Don Dailey a écrit : > The new scalability study is in progress. It will be very slow going, > only a few games a day can be played but we are trying to get more > computers utilized. > > I will update the data a few times a day for all to see. This includes > a cro

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread terry mcintyre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/test_package$ file autotest autotest: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped Don, a) if you release the source for autotest, I could compile a 64-bit executable, or b) perhaps you

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Michael Williams
That makes sense. It would also be interesting to see a special player in the mix: a Mogo_13B, with 200k nodes in the tree. Don Dailey wrote: I will just let the tests run and we can interpret the results later. I believe Mogo has some code to reuse nodes in the tree - although it may not

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Olivier Teytaud
[... discussion about bounded size tree...] Olivier seemed to think it would work acceptably well. Yes, I think so. We trust the pruning method. If we are wrong, it's a good piece of news for us - we can improve the algorithm just by increasing the constants :-) Olivier __

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Don Dailey
Tom Cooper wrote: > This is very cool. As of 261 games played, I find it very difficult to > guess whether the mogo curve is beginning to dramatically flatten, or > will continue to rise steeply. > > I have a few questions. > > I can't see the cross table, I guess you haven't put it up yet? I in

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Don Dailey
I will just let the tests run and we can interpret the results later. I believe Mogo has some code to reuse nodes in the tree - although it may not be quite as efficient. Olivier seemed to think it would work acceptably well. - Don Michael Williams wrote: > Also, with the parameters you are

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 cgos ranking page

2008-01-20 Thread Olivier Teytaud
The crosstables are back, but the sgf archives ar not. Sorry, many troubles since the maintenance of the website... i'm on that. ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Tom Cooper
This is very cool. As of 261 games played, I find it very difficult to guess whether the mogo curve is beginning to dramatically flatten, or will continue to rise steeply. I have a few questions. I can't see the cross table, I guess you haven't put it up yet? How do you decide the pairings? I

Re: [computer-go] 19x19 cgos ranking page

2008-01-20 Thread Jacques Basaldúa
Olivier Teytaud wrote: > the 19x19 CGOS ranking page is back (but might be still unstable) > and Leela seemingly performs quite well. > The crosstables will come back soon also. The crosstables are back, but the sgf archives ar not. I get: "Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~tey

Re: [computer-go] New scalability study progress report

2008-01-20 Thread Hideki Kato
Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >FatMan uses a fixed memory allocation and I think Mogo does too so I >don't even have a simple way to know how much memory FatMan is >"effectively" utilizing. Just as info, MoGo allocates memory dynamically. I saw it via "top" command on Linux. -Hideki >The t