Re: [computer-go] What Do You Need Most?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jason House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think someone already has a website somewhere where they try to rank bots based on KGS games. I'm pretty sure the site stopped doing rankings when KGS

Re: [computer-go] MoGo paper at ICML

, often yielding worse results. /Christian Nilsson On 6/23/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, We just presented our paper describing MoGo's improvements at ICML, and we thought we would pass on some of the feedback and corrections we have received. (http

Re: [computer-go] MoGo paper at ICML

On 6/25/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to admit that it took me several weeks to make the RAVE algorithm actually work, although the idea is so simple. That maybe explain your previous results. The description in the paper should be sufficient to make it work well. Ok, I'll

Re: [computer-go] cgosviewer and 19x19

cgosview.exe cgos.boardspace.net 6819 should do the trick. On 6/9/07, Joshua Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running dogbot now for 19x19. However I can't figure out how to view the games on 19x19 using the cgosviewer. I tried digging threw past emails but can't find the answer. Can

[computer-go] CGOS games

I've been trying to download the complete set of games from the new CGOS, but can't seem to find a suitable URL for the job. I tried all kinds of modifications of the URLs from the old system, but none worked. Are the games still available for batch downloads, or do I really have to fetch them

Re: [computer-go] CGOS 5 minute server

. / Christian Nilsson On 4/9/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The NEW and improved CGOS server is up and running. You will need to get fresh client software and may want to delete the old clients which will not work any longer. The protocol has not changed, so your old clients would actually

Re: [computer-go] Useless moves in the endgame

I've been experimenting a bit in the area of humanizing :) the endgame. The only method I've found acceptable is to do something like Don wrote. I use the average score in the tree to set at new goal for the search. First you start out with the standard goal of winning by at least 0.5 pts. But

Re: [computer-go] Useless moves in the endgame

Christian, can you close that 47% / 53% gap and still retain most of the win by margin by saying that only moves which are less than (5.5 - someFudgeFactor) are inferior? I'm not quite sure what you mean, but the gap is so small that almost anything would close it. ;) Or can you close the

Re: [computer-go] Sho-Dan-level at 9x9

On 1/1/07, Łukasz Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that MoGo is already stronger than 1d on KGS. I'm 3d KGS and it's hard to win. Mogo has almost no loses KGS. Lukasz I made a quick and dirty update to my old php-script to half-heartedly support cgoban3 ( not the online script, it's

Re: [computer-go] Anchor Player

There's also the small issue of the compensation given to white because of the extra black stones on the board. Setting a modified komi would break (MC-)programs with an internal rule for it. Not setting it would break those who does not use that rule. How is this compensation handled by the

Re: [computer-go] Anchor Player

-12-22 at 21:24 +0100, Christian Nilsson wrote: There's also the small issue of the compensation given to white because of the extra black stones on the board. Setting a modified komi would break (MC-)programs with an internal rule for it. Not setting it would break those who does not use