Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-16 Thread Hideki Kato
Hi Sylvain, Some computer-go friends in Japan have reported that even current binary of MoGo doesn't work on Athlon XP or Celeron. Both (and Pentium III) have no SSE2 instructions while Pentium 4 has. Could you please try -march=athlon-xp, pentium3 or generic? Hideki Sylvain Gelly: [EMAIL

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-16 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Hi Hideki, Some computer-go friends in Japan have reported that even current binary of MoGo doesn't work on Athlon XP or Celeron. Both (and Pentium III) have no SSE2 instructions while Pentium 4 has. Ok, I have to compile for older processor too then (I did not expect so old proc were still

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-16 Thread Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
Some computer-go friends in Japan have reported that even current binary of MoGo doesn't work on Athlon XP or Celeron. Both (and Pentium III) have no SSE2 instructions while Pentium 4 has. Could you please try -march=athlon-xp, pentium3 or generic? Hideki If it was possible to release the

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-13 Thread Alain Baeckeroot
On Monday 10 September 2007 10:37:17 Sylvain Gelly wrote: Is there a option like gnugo's --capture-all-dead? In my test(./mogo --9 --time 1), seems mogo passed when not capture alldead stones. As this release is mainly for humans to play, it is set to play against humans, so passing as

Re: [spam probable] Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
2007/9/10, David Stafford [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What are the options for someone who would like a dan-level opponent (even if it's 9x9) but doesn't have a Linux system currently? Are there choices other than MoGo? If not, I'm willing to build a Linux box but I have some questions: - Is a

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Have you tried Visual C++? http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/express/aa975050.aspx The thing is that VC++ does not have the pthread library. Sylvain ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
2007/9/10, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The command line parameter to change board size does nothing. I tried: ./mogo --19 ./mogo -19 and it only seemed to want to play on 9x9 boards.Am I doing something wrong? As I explained earlier in an answer, the command line parameters

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
I'm a little confused. If I operate with no parameters it works ok, No parameters means --19 but if I do ./mogo --7 (for instance) it goes into some kind of self-training mode. Did you see a --7 option on the manual? :-p There is no --7 option, nor a --13 one. You should put a --9 or a

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Well, I'm hoping for a Mac version someday... Hopefully it will happen. As I don't have a Mac, I rely on external help. I'll let you know :). Sylvain ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
when I run the Linux exeutable on my Fedora 8/Athlon XP, I get a coredump: $ mogo --9 --time 12 Load opening database opening succeed (nbEntries=618) (nbIllegalMoves removed 0) tried to open opening, success 1 Illegal instruction (core dumped) could it be that it is compiled for specific

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Is there a option like gnugo's --capture-all-dead? In my test(./mogo --9 --time 1), seems mogo passed when not capture alldead stones. As this release is mainly for humans to play, it is set to play against humans, so passing as soon as the opponent passes and it is safe to pass. If you

RE: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Edward de Grijs
... Goodbye Sylvain and have much success in your life. Edward. Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 21:20:59 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: computer-go@computer-go.org Subject: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo Hi all, I am pleased to announce a binary release of current version

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Yamato
Have you tried Visual C++? http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/express/aa975050.aspx The thing is that VC++ does not have the pthread library. This library might be help. http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/ # I have not used it, though -- Yamato

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Markus Enzenberger
On Monday 10 September 2007, Sylvain Gelly wrote: could it be that it is compiled for specific CPU architecture? Of course it is :). Ok, good (well, rather sad :)), to know that it does not work on Athlon XP. I should rebuild with an older architecture then (but it will be slower :-( ). I

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Don Dailey
The point is that if I start it with ANY command line options (not using goui but typing the gtp commands in a shell) it immediately goes into some self-learning mode and you cannot play games. I haven't tried it with gogui. - Don On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:21 +0200, Sylvain Gelly wrote:

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Don Dailey
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:34 +0200, Sylvain Gelly wrote: I'm a little confused. If I operate with no parameters it works ok, No parameters means --19 but if I do ./mogo --7 (for instance) it goes into some kind of self-training mode. Did you see a --7 option on the manual? :-p It

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Don Dailey
Ok, Sorry for all the trouble.I didn't know you HAD to type a level option. I can now do ./mogo --9 --nbThreads 2 I think I was a bit confused by the self-train initialization message which appears whether it's accepting gtp commands or not. If you do ./mogo --nbThreads 2 as you say it

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-10 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Hi Markus, Hi all, I updated the package to fix the issues you get and some other minor ones. Please update before reporting a problem, and please report any further problem :-). I don't know about Ubuntu, but the default GCC configuration on Fedora does not set CPU-specific compiler options,

[computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Hi all, I am pleased to announce a binary release of current version of MoGo. It is specially designed for players but of course it may be interesting for some of you as a benchmark. You download it and see the instructions there: http://www.lri.fr/~gelly/MoGo.htm Of course, please feel free to

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread David Doshay
Well, it has been a pleasure and instructive for all of us! Good luck with whatever comes next. Cheers, David On 9, Sep 2007, at 12:20 PM, Sylvain Gelly wrote: I would also take this occasion to say goodbye to you all, and thank you for all the discussions. I now finished (and almost

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Congratulations. Are there any plans to release the source? Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. - Brian ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Sylvain Gelly
2007/9/9, Brian Slesinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Are there any plans to release the source? I don't think so. Plus, some will work on MoGo source code, so it is their decision, not mine. Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. Well, it actually builds and work on windows, only the

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
Thanks Sylvain, This is a wonderful gift to the computer go community! - Don On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 21:20 +0200, Sylvain Gelly wrote: Hi all, I am pleased to announce a binary release of current version of MoGo. It is specially designed for players but of course it may be interesting for

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Brian Slesinsky
On 9/9/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. Well, it actually builds and work on windows, only the speed is an issue. I should try if the speed is the same on linux with such an old compiler. My guess is that it is really a matter of

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Markus Enzenberger
when I run the Linux exeutable on my Fedora 8/Athlon XP, I get a coredump: $ mogo --9 --time 12 Load opening database opening succeed (nbEntries=618) (nbIllegalMoves removed 0) tried to open opening, success 1 Illegal instruction (core dumped) could it be that it is compiled for specific CPU

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Markus Enzenberger
when I run the Linux exeutable on my Fedora 8/Athlon XP, I get a I mean Fedora 7... - Markus ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread David Stafford
What are the options for someone who would like a dan-level opponent (even if it's 9x9) but doesn't have a Linux system currently? Are there choices other than MoGo? If not, I'm willing to build a Linux box but I have some questions: - Is a quad-core Xeon better for MoGo than a higher-clocked

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
I have no problem running on a core 2 duo Ubuntu linux (feisty fawn) It also runs with multiple threads. I tried 8 threads (even though I have only 2 cores) and it worked just fine. - Don On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 01:33 +0200, Cenny Wenner wrote: Runs like a charm on FC6 64bit, one core. How

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Yamato
It is a good news for all of us. I have no time to develop my Go program now, but I will use it as a local opponent when I come back again. Unfortunately, only the linux version is available (for the moment?). I wanted to wait for the windows version to be available at the same time, but it is 2

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
I'm a little confused. If I operate with no parameters it works ok, but if I do ./mogo --7 (for instance) it goes into some kind of self-training mode. It seems to do this no matter what parameter I use including setting the number of processes. If I go with no command line options, I

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Darren Cook
What are the options for someone who ... doesn't have a Linux system currently? LiveCDs ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiveCD ) allow you to do a temporary linux installation. Of course, then you have to decide which one, and which distro. I would think any of those marked for general in this

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread elife
Thanks Sylvain for this wonderful gift! Is there a option like gnugo's --capture-all-dead? In my test(./mogo --9 --time 1), seems mogo passed when not capture alldead stones. By the way, is --time 0.1 valid? ___ computer-go mailing list