deviation is useless. For
good reasons.
David
-Original Message-
From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:48 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: [computer-go] Rating
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9 CGOS rating of
roughly 2475.
When I looked today, I saw Valkyria 3.3.4 rated at roughly 2334, so I
wondered what was going on.
I found a contributing factor:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:48:05PM -0600, Brian Sheppard wrote:
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9 CGOS rating of
roughly 2475.
When I looked today, I saw Valkyria 3.3.4 rated at roughly
When I get more time to work on Valkyria again maybe I should look
closely at the games against Pachi...
-Magnus
Quoting Brian Sheppard sheppar...@aol.com:
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of its
board representation. At that time Valkyria 3.3.4 had a 9x9
One must be very careful about proclaiming wild transitivity issues. I'm
not saying it's not an issue, there is some going on with every program on
CGOS, but with less than 500 games between any two players you are going
to get error margins of +/- 30-50 ELO or something like that.
And CGOS
One must be very careful about proclaiming wild transitivity issues. I'm
not saying it's not an issue, there is some going on with every program on
CGOS, but with less than 500 games between any two players you are going
to get error margins of +/- 30-50 ELO or something like that.
Actually we
[mailto:computer-go-
boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Brian Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:48 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: [computer-go] Rating variability on CGOS
About two weeks ago I took Pebbles offline for an extensive overhaul of
its
board representation
