Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-27 Thread Magnus Persson
Quoting Michael Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm curious what the winrate of the bug-fixed version is over the original version. The last version with bugs was Valkyria3.2.0 with 2216 Elo on CGOS, whereas the new version Valkyria3.2.1 currently has 2255. It is doing really well against Mo

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-27 Thread Michael Williams
Magnus Persson wrote: I have now debugged Valkyria with the test positions, 5 bugs was found directly in the move generation preventing some tesujis to be played. 2 bugs was also found for moves deeper in the search tree. Some bugs affected more than one position. With the new version Valkyri

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-27 Thread David Fotland
L PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunnar Farnebäck > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:58 AM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > Yamato wrote: > > I attached the fixed version to this email. Thanks for you

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
David Fotland wrote: > Another alternate move. On problem 108 it seems that a2 works, although it > looks inferior. > A2, a3, g1, h1, a4, and if white cuts at b4, black captures and white has no > ko threats. > If white doesn’t answer at h1, black can live in the corner and white can’t > li

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread Eric Boesch
"Huh" is right. You wrote C2 C1 and so did I, but I somehow did so while looking at C1 C2. I'm not sure how I managed that myself. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? A seki doesn't get much more basic than this. > > 4 X X X X X . X . X 4 > 3 . O

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Huh? A seki doesn't get much more basic than this. 4 X X X X X . X . X 4 3 . O O O O X X O . 3 2 O O O . O O X . . 2 1 . X X X O X X . . 1 A B C D E F G H J /Gunnar Eric Boesch wrote: > Black doesn't need the lower-right corner as territory after killing > the lower left. After B B1 W C

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread Eric Boesch
Black doesn't need the lower-right corner as territory after killing the lower left. After B B1 W C2 B C1 W H3 B G3, w gains about 7 points in the lower right but has already lost like 31 in the lower left, and black wins by 15. Either I'm missing something obvious, or you overlooked that the lowe

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread David Fotland
correct? David > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunnar Farnebäck > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:20 PM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > Y

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-26 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > I attached the fixed version to this email. Thanks for your help. Another correction. In 119 black has a serious weakness on the right. Is there any way for black to win after B B1, W C2, B C1, W H3? /Gunnar ___ computer-go mailing list

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-25 Thread Magnus Persson
I have now debugged Valkyria with the test positions, 5 bugs was found directly in the move generation preventing some tesujis to be played. 2 bugs was also found for moves deeper in the search tree. Some bugs affected more than one position. With the new version Valkyria does: 100035

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-25 Thread John Fan
You are right. B2 does not work. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Yamato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Fan wrote: > >On Problem 125, sounds like B2 is also a right move. > > B:B2, W:B1, B:C1, W:A2, B:A1, W:C2, B:A3, W:D1. > > Black seems to cannot win this ko. > > -- > Yamato > _

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-24 Thread Yamato
John Fan wrote: >On Problem 125, sounds like B2 is also a right move. B:B2, W:B1, B:C1, W:A2, B:A1, W:C2, B:A3, W:D1. Black seems to cannot win this ko. -- Yamato ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailm

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-24 Thread Don Dailey
When you guys get those problems corrected, can you send an updated version? - Don John Fan wrote: > On Problem 125, sounds like B2 is also a right move. > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Yamato wrote: >> >>> Thanks Gian-Carlo, Gunn

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-24 Thread John Fan
On Problem 125, sounds like B2 is also a right move. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yamato wrote: > > Thanks Gian-Carlo, Gunnar. > > > > Current list of results. > > > > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 0 : 24/50 > > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 10 : 34/

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread dhillismail
that black is so far behind that it should politely resign :-\ - Dave Hillis -Original Message- From: Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: computer-go Sent: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 3:33 pm Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs Yamato wrote:  > Thanks Gian

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > Thanks Gian-Carlo, Gunnar. > > Current list of results. > > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 0 : 24/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 10 : 34/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 15 : 37/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 mc, 1k : 30/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 mc, 10k : 31/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 mc,

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread Edward de Grijs
Hi all, thanks Yamato for the positions. FirstGo version 330 results: 1k playouts -> 27/50 passes10k playouts -> 30/50 passes100k playouts -> 33/50 passes (100k takes about 8 seconds/position average on P4 2.67Ghz.) Edward. ___

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
David Fotland wrote: on problem 101, Many Faces likes A4, which I think also works, but I didn't have time to check it thoroughly. If A4 doesn't work, then Many Faces is back to 37. A4 doesn't work. White plays E1 and is safe. Black G1 is answered by J3. /Gunnar __

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread Magnus Persson
I went through the problems with Valkyria. Right now it can do 32 out 50 where it had to think more than 10 seconds on perhaps 2 of those problems it solved. But I do recommend to go through these problems by hand. At least one position had the first move right but it seemed very week on the

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread David Fotland
lf Of Yamato > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:21 AM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > David Fotland wrote: > >I didn't see this: > > > >>>148: D1 also wins? > >> You are right. Thanks for correction

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread David Fotland
: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > Gunnar Farnebäck wrote: > > >> 143: I don't see how A3 could win the semeai. A2 and C4 look more > > >> effective. > > > > > > Typo, it was A2. C4 cannot work. > > > >How d

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread David Fotland
I tested with your old version. I'll try tomorrow with the new one > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yamato > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:21 AM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-23 Thread Yamato
David Fotland wrote: >I didn’t see this: > >>>148: D1 also wins? >> You are right. Thanks for correction. > >Many Faces played D1, so change it to 38 correct. Did you use the fixed version? I corrected #148 as follows. Is it still wrong? loadsgf sgf/mc148.sgf 148 reg_genmove black #? [B1|D1] --

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-22 Thread David Fotland
nt: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:20 PM > To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > Yamato wrote: > > Gunnar Farnebäck wrote: > >>>> 143: I don't see how A3 could win the semeai. A2 and C4 look more > >>>> effe

RE: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-22 Thread David Fotland
To: computer-go > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs > > Thanks Gian-Carlo, Gunnar. > > Current list of results. > > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 0 : 24/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 10 : 34/50 > GNU Go 3.7.12 level 15 : 37/50 >

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-22 Thread Yamato
Thanks Gian-Carlo, Gunnar. Current list of results. GNU Go 3.7.12 level 0 : 24/50 GNU Go 3.7.12 level 10 : 34/50 GNU Go 3.7.12 level 15 : 37/50 GNU Go 3.7.12 mc, 1k : 30/50 GNU Go 3.7.12 mc, 10k : 31/50 GNU Go 3.7.12 mc, 100k : 38/50 GNU Go 3.7.

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-22 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > Gunnar Farnebäck wrote: 143: I don't see how A3 could win the semeai. A2 and C4 look more effective. >>> Typo, it was A2. C4 cannot work. >> How does white defend against C4? I'm looking at B C4, W B4, B B5, >> W B6, B A2 without finding a way out for white. Did I miss so

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-22 Thread Gian-Carlo Pascutto
> I attached the fixed version to this email. Thanks for your help. Leela 0.3.14 1k -> 19/50 passes 10k -> 28/50 passes 100k -> 36/50 passes -- GCP ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > Gunnar Farnebäck wrote: >> 130: D2 becomes more complicated but looks good enough to win with >> komi 7.5. > > I don't see why D2 works. After E2, can black live? You're right. I was busy counting how much damage white could do on the right with various moves cutting the threatene

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Yamato
Gunnar Farnebäck wrote: >108: If I'm not mistaken A3 and G1 both give B+3.5 whereas A2 gives >B+1.5 so komi could be 9.5 but there would still be two solutions. > >113: Black can also start with E8 and still have sufficient ko >threats. > >125: B1 also kills. > >128: D2 kills, not C2. > >131: It lo

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > Don Dailey wrote: >> Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so >> that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you >> can modify some problems by manipulating the komi to make this true. > > I intend to have adjusted all of them l

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Yamato wrote: > Hi all. > > I'd like to share my test set for MC programs. > This is a gnugo-style "regression test" file. To use it, you need > to implement 2 GTP commands, loadsgf and reg_genmove. > Then, run your program like this: > > gnugo --mode gtp < mctest.tst | awk -f regress.awk tst=mcte

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Don Dailey wrote: > Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so > that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you > can modify some problems by manipulating the komi to make this true. You can manipulate komi to turn any unfinished position into

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Don Dailey
By the way, thank you for contributing this set of go problems, it should be very useful. - Don Yamato wrote: > Don Dailey wrote: > >> Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so >> that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you >> can

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Don Dailey
Yamato wrote: > Don Dailey wrote: > >> Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so >> that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you >> can modify some problems by manipulating the komi to make this true. >> > > I intend to have adjust

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Yamato
Don Dailey wrote: >Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so >that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you >can modify some problems by manipulating the komi to make this true. I intend to have adjusted all of them like that (only 1 move =

Re: [computer-go] Test position set for MC programs

2008-04-21 Thread Don Dailey
Go problems don't work for MC programs unless you can arrange them so that finding the right move wins, and anything else loses. I found you can modify some problems by manipulating the komi to make this true. - Don Yamato wrote: > Hi all. > > I'd like to share my test set for MC programs. >