Sylvain Gelly wrote:
2008/1/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Sylvain,
Have you finished your thesis? We are eager to read it:-)
Hi,
Yes I did! :).It is not on my website, but will (soon?).
However, you should not be so
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
It looks like MoGo does respect the time_left commands from GTP, so I
don't think the totalTime parameter is required in this case.
What do you mean? If you don't put --totalTime, then MoGo indeed ignores
time_left. If you put --totalTime, then it respect the
From: Rémi Coulom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
Yes I did! :).It is not on my website, but will (soon?).
However, you should not be so eager to read it :)
Cheers,
Sylvain
Google finds it:
http://tao.lri.fr/Papers/thesesTAO/SylvainGellyThesis.pdf
Thanks, Rémi!
Now eagerly
There is lots of English in it. Just scroll down.
terry mcintyre wrote:
From: Rémi Coulom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
Yes I did! :).It is not on my website, but will (soon?).
However, you should not be so eager to read it :)
Cheers,
Sylvain
Google finds it:
The reason I said that was this behavior from mogo. If I start it without
that switch and as for a move, it allocates 20 seconds. If I then issue a
small
time_left command and ask for another move, it allocates a much smaller
amount of time. Here is the output:
Because you give a
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
The reason I said that was this behavior from mogo. If I start it
without that switch and as for a move, it allocates 20 seconds. If
I then issue a small
time_left command and ask for another move, it allocates a much
smaller amount of time. Here is
Hi,
Nothing strange here. You tell MoGo to play 19x19 and you tell him that
there is only 60 s left. It can be understood that it takes only 1s for this
move...
BTW, if you see him play in 9x9, it is because while you told him to set his
parameters for a 19x19, by default the boardsize is 9x9 and
I'm not saying that it's anything strange. I was just pointing out that it does seem to heed the time_left number, even without specifying totalTime on the
command line. Yes, I started mogo with the --19 switch so that it would have to think about the first move on 9x9 instead of using the
It looks like MoGo does respect the time_left commands from GTP, so I
don't think the totalTime parameter is required in this case.
What do you mean? If you don't put --totalTime, then MoGo indeed ignores
time_left. If you put --totalTime, then it respect the time_left.
Cheers,
Sylvain
2008/1/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Sylvain,
Have you finished your thesis? We are eager to read it:-)
Hi,
Yes I did! :).It is not on my website, but will (soon?).
However, you should not be so eager to read it :)
Cheers,
Sylvain
On 1/10/08, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL
Hi,
I guess the public version of MoGo was designed with a
focus on 9x9 and not 19x19.
It was not more on 9x9 that 19x19, it was more or less the best settings of
MoGo against gnugo at the moment I left the developpement (early september)
for both 9x9 and 19x19.
Or is there something else I
Hi Sylvain,
Have you finished your thesis? We are eager to read it:-)
On 1/10/08, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess the public version of MoGo was designed with a
focus on 9x9 and not 19x19.
It was not more on 9x9 that 19x19, it was more or less the best settings of
MoGoRel3_3550pps lost its winning game for not removing dead stones.
http://www.lri.fr/~teytaud/SGF/2008/01/10/8590.sgf
Maybe Mogo will pass when opponent pass in 19x19.
Is there no option to remove dead stones?
Hiroshi Yamashita
- Original Message -
From: Michael Williams [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
